AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Powell, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, F. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:315-318
© American Roentgen Ray Society


A New Device to Limit Extravasation During Contrast-Enhanced CT

Craig C. Powell1, Jian ming Li, Louis Rodino and Frederick A. Anderson

1 All authors: Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave., N., Worcester, MA 01655.

OBJECTIVE. The extravasation detection accessory (EDA) is designed for use during contrast-enhanced CT studies performed with a power injector. The EDA detects the changes in soft-tissue impedance that occur with enhanced extravasation and halts the further infusion of contrast material via a feedback circuit to the injector. We tested the sensitivity of this device in a model of contrast extravasation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Study subjects had an extravasation of 5% dextrose in water (nonionic contrast equivalent) in one arm and 0.9% sodium chloride solution (ionic contrast equivalent) in the other. An EDA was placed over the site of infusion and connected to a power injector. Injections were performed at 0.25 ml/sec (n = 40), 2.5 ml/sec (n = 62), or 5 ml/sec (n = 20).

RESULTS. At infusion rates of 2.5 and 5 ml/sec, the device halted the injector in every subject after an average volume of 12.5 ± 1.6 ml was delivered. At 0.25 ml/sec, the device failed to halt the injector in 11 of 20 events. After reprogramming the algorithm, 10 more subjects were tested at the lowest injection rate. The device halted 18 of 20 extravasation events with an average volume of 3.7 ± 0.5 ml.

CONCLUSION. In our model of contrast extravasation, the EDA halted a power injector with reliability and reproducibility before a large volume of contrast material was delivered. The sensitivity of the device approached, but did not reach, 100%. This device may serve to diminish the morbidity of extravasation events.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.