AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, O.
Right arrow Articles by L'Herminé, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, O.
Right arrow Articles by L'Herminé, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 174:433-439
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold MR Angiography and Conventional Angiography

Olivier Ernst1,2, Vincent Asnar3, Géraldine Sergent1, Emmanuel Lederman3, Lionel Nicol4, Jean-Claude Paris3 and Claude L'Herminé1

1 Department of Radiology, Hôpital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, 1 rue Polonovski, F-59037 Lille, France.
2 Department of Radiology, Hôpital Calmette, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Blvd. du Professeur Leclerc, F-59037 Lille, France.
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, F-59037 Lille, France.
4 Siemens SAS, 39 Blvd. Ornano, F-93527 Saint-Denis, France.

OBJECTIVE. Our aim was to compare the results of gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MRangiographywiththoseofconventionalangiographyforthestudyofmesentericcirculation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography were prospectively performed in 33 patients referred for hepatic, pancreatic, or mesenteric disease. MR angiography was performed with four three-dimensional acquisitions at 0, 30, 60, and 90 sec after injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadolinium. Selective conventional angiography was used as the standard of reference.

RESULTS. A pure arterial angiogram (one on which veins could not be visualized) was obtainedin 27 patients during the second or third acquisition. By subtracting the arterial phase from an arteriovenous phase (third or fourth acquisition) we obtained a pure venous angiogram (one on which arteries could not be visualized) in 28 patients. Agreement was good or excellent for the hepatic artery ({kappa} = 0.78), the superior mesenteric artery ({kappa} = 0.65), the splenic artery ({kappa} = 0.70), the portal vein ({kappa} = 1.0), the superior mesenteric vein ({kappa} = 0.88), and the splenic vein ({kappa} = 0.75). Agreement was poor, and vessels were better shown by conventional angiography, for the intrahepatic arteries ({kappa} = 0.006) and the branches of the superior mesenteric artery ({kappa} = 0.14). MR angiography and conventional angiography revealed 29 and 27 portosystemic collaterals, respectively.

CONCLUSION. Dynamic breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared favorably with conventional angiography in preoperative assessment of the proximal mesenteric arteries and in the evaluation of portal hypertension; however, conventional angiography is still necessary to evaluate distal arteries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Ito, S. Koike, A. Shimizu, M. Tanabe, C. Jo, M. Miyazaki, and N. Matsunaga
Portal Venous System: Evaluation with Unenhanced MR Angiography with a Single-Breath-Hold ECG-Synchronized 3D Half-Fourier Fast Spin-Echo Sequence
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 550 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. H. M. Caiado, R. Blasbalg, A. S. Z. Marcelino, M. da Cunha Pinho, M. C. Chammas, C. da Costa Leite, G. G. Cerri, A. C. de Oliveira, T. Bacchella, and M. C. C. Machado
Complications of Liver Transplantation: Multimodality Imaging Approach
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1401 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. S. Kim, T. K. Kim, D. J. Jung, J. H. Kim, I. Y. Bae, K.-B. Sung, P. N. Kim, H. K. Ha, S. G. Lee, and M.-G. Lee
Vascular Complications After Living Related Liver Transplantation: Evaluation with Gadolinium-Enhanced Three-Dimensional MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 467 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
F. Cognet, D. B. Salem, M. Dranssart, J.-P. Cercueil, M. Weiller, E. Tatou, L. Boyer, and D. Krause
Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: Imaging and Percutaneous Treatment
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 863 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. F. Glockner
Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography: Applications for Abdominal Imaging
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): 357 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.