| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate renal cyst pseudoenhancement during helical CT in a phantom model and in patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Iodine baths containing water-filled spheres and cylinders were constructed to simulate cysts in enhancing renal parenchyma. Iodine concentration, cyst size and location, collimation, and peak kilovoltage were varied and cyst attenuation was measured. Data were analyzed with the mixed linear models and Mantel-Haenszel tests. Subsequently, a paired t test compared CT attenuation values before and after contrast material enhancement in 40 patients with 68 renal cysts (radiographic stability >3 months).
RESULTS. The attenuation values of phantom cysts increased when placed in a contrast media bath (p = 0.001). The increase in attenuation values became more pronounced with increasing iodine concentrations, decreasing peak kilovoltage, and smaller sphere sizes. In patients, mean cyst attenuation increased 3.4 ± 6.2 H after administration of contrast material (p = 0.00002). The attenuation did not increase more than 10 H in any of the 37 cysts larger than 2 cm found in patients. Eight (26%) of the 31 cysts smaller than 2 cm found in patients increased by at least 10 H.
CONCLUSION. In a phantom model, at simulated physiologic levels of renal enhancement, cysts may pseudoenhance by more than 10 H. Similarly, in patients, cysts may also pseudoenhance; however, most pseudoenhancement does not exceed 10 H. In patients, pseudoenhancement of at least 10 H is more likely in cysts smaller than 2 cm.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Z. J. Wang, F. V. Coakley, Y. Fu, B. N. Joe, S. Prevrhal, L. A. Landeras, E. M. Webb, and B. M. Yeh Renal Cyst Pseudoenhancement at Multidetector CT: What Are the Effects of Number of Detectors and Peak Tube Voltage? Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 910 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak Pitfalls in Renal Mass Evaluation and How to Avoid Them RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1325 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Birnbaum, N. Hindman, J. Lee, and J. S. Babb Renal Cyst Pseudoenhancement: Influence of Multidetector CT Reconstruction Algorithm and Scanner Type in Phantom Model Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 767 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Remer, G. A. Motta-Ramirez, L. B. Shepardson, A. H. Hamrahian, and B. R. Herts CT histogram analysis in pathologically proven adrenal masses. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Benjaminov, M. Atri, M. O'Malley, K. Lobo, and G. Tomlinson Enhancing Component on CT to Predict Malignancy in Cystic Renal Masses and Interobserver Agreement of Different CT Features. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 665 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Jinzaki, J. D. McTavish, K. H. Zou, P. F. Judy, and S. G. Silverman Evaluation of Small (<= 3 cm) Renal Masses with MDCT: Benefits of Thin Overlapping Reconstructions Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 223 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. P. Chung, B. R. Herts, G. Linnell, A. C. Novick, N. Obuchowski, D. M. Coll, and M. E. Baker Analysis of Changes in Attenuation of Proven Renal Cysts on Different Scanning Phases of Triphasic MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. T. Bae, P. Fuangtharnthip, S. R. Prasad, B. N. Joe, and J. P. Heiken Adrenal Masses: CT Characterization with Histogram Analysis Method Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 735 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Abdulla, M. K. Kalra, S. Saini, M. M. Maher, A. Ahmad, E. Halpern, and S. G. Silverman Pseudoenhancement of Simulated Renal Cysts in a Phantom Using Different Multidetector CT Scanners Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1473 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Birnbaum, D. D. Maki, D. P. Chakraborty, J. E. Jacobs, and J. S. Babb Renal Cyst Pseudoenhancement: Evaluation with an Anthropomorphic Body CT Phantom Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 83 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. S. Curry, S. T. Cochran, and N. K. Bissada Cystic Renal Masses: Accurate Bosniak Classification Requires Adequate Renal CT Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 339 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
