HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scott, J. A. Articles by Fischman, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Scott, J. A. Articles by Fischman, A. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

How Well Can Radiologists Using Neural Network Software Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism?

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.

OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated and optimized the performance of an automated artificial neural network image interpreter in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism on ventilation-perfusion lung scans. The computer interpretations were compared with the interpretations of three experienced observers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Digital data were obtained from 100 patients with normal findings on chest radiographs who were undergoing both radionuclide ventilation-perfusion scanning and pulmonary angiography. Interpretations of differently trained neural networks were compared with those of three experienced nuclear medicine practitioners unaware of the clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS. Machines running neural networks performed similarly to experienced scan interpreters in the detection of pulmonary embolism. Both the human observers and the networks performed best in cases with large emboli. Neural network performance was best in the right lung, when the networks were trained using only cases with large emboli and when networks were trained independently in the right and left lungs. The best predictions resulted from a collaborative interpretation incorporating both the human and computer predictions.

CONCLUSION. Computers running artificial neural networks using scan data obtained directly from the anterior and posterior ventilation and perfusion images, without human involvement, perform comparably with experienced observers in patients with normal findings on chest radiographs. Human observers can improve their interpretations by incorporating computer output to formulate diagnostic prediction. The method of training the networks is critical to optimizing performance.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Johnson Hard- versus Soft-Copy Interpretation Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 629 - 630. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Evancho, H. Yoshida, and A. Dachman Computer-aided Diagnosis: Blessing or Curse? * Drs Yoshida and Dachman respond: Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 606 - 607. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Eng Predicting the Presence of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Comparative Analysis of the Artificial Neural Network, Logistic Regression, and Threshold Models Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 869 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Scott Pulmonary Perfusion Patterns and Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 513 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]