| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-9723.
OBJECTIVE. Although representing a minority of adrenal adenomas, the lipid-poor variety cannot be accurately identified on unenhanced CT or chemical shift MR imaging. We compared the delayed contrast-enhanced CT features of lipid-poor adenomas with those of lipid-rich adenomas and of adrenal nonadenomas to determine whether there were differences in the washout features between these groups of lesions.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eighteen proven lipid-poor adenomas, 56 lipid-rich adenomas, and 40 adrenal nonadenomas underwent CT before, immediately after, and 15 min delay after IV contrast injection. Region-of-interest measurements were made of all adrenal lesions at the three time points. The degree of enhancement, enhancement washout, percentage enhancement washout, and relative percentage enhancement washout were calculated for each adrenal mass. Pooled data were analyzed statistically. Optimal threshold values for diagnosing adrenal adenomas were also determined.
RESULTS. The mean CT attenuation of lipid-poor adenomas was significantly higher than that of lipid-rich adenomas at all three phases but not significantly different from that of nonadenomas. The mean percentage enhancement washout on images obtained 15 min after administration of contrast material was similar for lipid-rich and lipid-poor adenomas but was significantly higher than that of nonadenomas. The mean relative percentage enhancement washout was significantly different among all three groups.
CONCLUSION. Lipid-poor adenomas cannot be differentiated from adrenal nonadenomas on the basis of a single mean attenuation value. However, lipid-poor adrenal adenomas show enhancement and enhancement washout features nearly identical to lipid-rich adenomas and can be distinguished from nonadenomas on the basis of a percentage washout threshold value of 60% and a relative percentage washout of 40%.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. W. L. Boland, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, and W. W. Mayo-Smith Incidental Adrenal Lesions: Principles, Techniques, and Algorithms for Imaging Characterization Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 756 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P K Singh and H N Buch Adrenal incidentaloma: evaluation and management J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 61(11): 1168 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Faria, S. M. Goldman, J. Szejnfeld, H. Melo, C. Kater, P. Kenney, M. P. Huayllas, G. Demarchi, V. V. Francisco, C. Andreoni, et al. Adrenal Masses: Characterization with in Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 788 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Patel, R. K. Lingam, T. I. Beaconsfield, T. L. Tran, and B. Brown Role of Radiology in the Management of Primary Aldosteronism RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1145 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. K. Park, C. K. Kim, B. Kim, and J. H. Lee Comparison of Delayed Enhanced CT and Chemical Shift MR for Evaluating Hyperattenuating Incidental Adrenal Masses Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 760 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Chong, K. S. Lee, H. Y. Kim, Y. K. Kim, B.-T. Kim, M. J. Chung, C. A Yi, and G. Y. Kwon Integrated PET-CT for the Characterization of Adrenal Gland Lesions in Cancer Patients: Diagnostic Efficacy and Interpretation Pitfalls RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1811 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. A. Slattery, M. A. Blake, M. K. Kalra, J. Misdraji, A. T. Sweeney, P. M. Copeland, P. R. Mueller, and G. W. Boland Adrenocortical carcinoma: contrast washout characteristics on CT. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W21 - W24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Allolio and M. Fassnacht Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Clinical Update J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2027 - 2037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Blake, J. M. A. Slattery, M. K. Kalra, E. F. Halpern, A. J. Fischman, P. R. Mueller, and G. W. Boland Adrenal Lesions: Characterization with Fused PET/CT Image in Patients with Proved or Suspected Malignancy--Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 970 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Blake, M. K. Kalra, A. T. Sweeney, B. C. Lucey, M. M. Maher, D. V. Sahani, E. F. Halpern, P. R. Mueller, P. F. Hahn, and G. W. Boland Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Adrenal Masses: Multi-Detector Row CT Protocol with 10-Minute Delay Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2382041514. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R Nawar and D Aron Adrenal incidentalomas -- a continuing management dilemma Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 585 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. H. Hamrahian, A. G. Ioachimescu, E. M. Remer, G. Motta-Ramirez, H. Bogabathina, H. S. Levin, S. Reddy, I. S. Gill, A. Siperstein, and E. L. Bravo Clinical Utility of Noncontrast Computed Tomography Attenuation Value (Hounsfield Units) to Differentiate Adrenal Adenomas/Hyperplasias from Nonadenomas: Cleveland Clinic Experience J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 871 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. H. Szolar, M. Korobkin, P. Reittner, A. Berghold, T. Bauernhofer, H. Trummer, H. Schoellnast, K. W. Preidler, and H. Samonigg Adrenocortical Carcinomas and Adrenal Pheochromocytomas: Mass and Enhancement Loss Evaluation at Delayed Contrast-enhanced CT Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 479 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Israel, M. Korobkin, C. Wang, E. N. Hecht, and G. A. Krinsky Comparison of Unenhanced CT and Chemical Shift MRI in Evaluating Lipid-Rich Adrenal Adenomas Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 215 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Mansmann, J. Lau, E. Balk, M. Rothberg, Y. Miyachi, and S. R. Bornstein The Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Mass: Update in Diagnosis and Management Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 309 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. T. Bae, P. Fuangtharnthip, S. R. Prasad, B. N. Joe, and J. P. Heiken Adrenal Masses: CT Characterization with Histogram Analysis Method Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 735 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. W. Mayo-Smith, E. M. Caoili, and M. Korobkin CT Characterization of Adrenal Masses * Drs Caoili and Korobkin respond: Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 289 - 290. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. R. Dunnick and M. Korobkin Imaging of Adrenal Incidentalomas: Current Status Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 559 - 568. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. W. Mayo-Smith, G. W. Boland, R. B. Noto, and M. J. Lee State-of-the-Art Adrenal Imaging RadioGraphics, July 1, 2001; 21(4): 995 - 1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Caoili, M. Korobkin, I. R. Francis, R. H. Cohan, J. F. Platt, N. R. Dunnick, and K. I. Raghupathi Adrenal Masses: Characterization with Combined Unenhanced and Delayed Enhanced CT Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 629 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
