| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, The University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave.,
Tucson, AZ 85724-5067.
2
Present address: Department of Radiology, San Francisco General Hospital, 100
Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110.
3
Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3601 S. 6th Ave.,
Tucson, AZ 85723.
OBJECTIVE. This study was designed to assess the ability of radiologists to accurately detect calcification within a solitary pulmonary nodule with chest radiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-five solitary pulmonary nodules that were examined by both posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography and on thin-section CT were retrospectively identified. Fourteen radiologists blinded to the results of CT assessed the nodules for the presence or absence of calcification using chest radiographs alone. The radiologists then assigned one of six values on the basis of their confidence in that assessment. The accuracy and confidence values for each nodule were analyzed on the basis of the presence or absence of calcification as seen on CT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated.
RESULTS. The positive predictive value of a "definitely calcified" assessment was 0.93. Combining all levels of radiologists' confidence, the sensitivity of the chest radiograph in the detection of calcium was 0.50 and the specificity was 0.87. There was no difference in the confidence levels reported between the calcified and noncalcified nodules, and there was no correlation of nodule size with accuracy or confidence level.
CONCLUSION. The ability of radiologists to detect calcium in a solitary pulmonary nodule by chest radiography was low, as defined by the ROC data. Of the "definitely calcified" nodules, up to 7% may not be calcified and may be potentially malignant. Without documentation of long-term stability, a low threshold for recommending CT may be appropriate.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A O Soubani The evaluation and management of the solitary pulmonary nodule Postgrad. Med. J., September 1, 2008; 84(995): 459 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Marom "CT of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule"--A Commentary Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1154 - 1155. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Krupinski, W. C. Black, and F. S. Chew Methodology and Application of Prospective Reader Studies: Self-Assessment Module Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3_Supplement): S29 - S34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Ko, C. C. Roberts, W. G. Berger, and F. S. Chew Imaging Evaluation of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: Self-Assessment Module Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3_Supplement): S1 - S4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. T. Winer-Muram The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 34 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Fischbach, T. Freund, R. Rottgen, U. Engert, R. Felix, and J. Ricke Dual-Energy Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Digital Detector: Revealing Calcified Chest Abnormalities Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1519 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Ost, A. M. Fein, and S. H. Feinsilver The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule N. Engl. J. Med., June 19, 2003; 348(25): 2535 - 2542. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. B. Tan, K. R. Flaherty, E. A. Kazerooni, and M. D. Iannettoni The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 89S - 96S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
