AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, L. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 176:297-301
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Helical CT of the Body

Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients?

Anne Paterson1, Donald P. Frush2 and Lane F. Donnelly3

1 Department of Radiology, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, 180 Falls Rd., Belfast BT12 6BE, Northern Ireland.
2 Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Rm. 1905, McGovern-Davison Children's Health Center, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710.
3 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine whether adjustments related to patient age are made in the scanning parameters that are determinants of radiation dose for helical CT of pediatric patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective investigation included all body (chest and abdomen) helical CT examinations (n = 58) of neonates, infants, and children (n = 32) referred from outside institutions for whom radiologic consultation was requested. Information recorded included tube current, kilovoltage, collimation, and pitch. Examinations were arbitrarily grouped on the basis of the individual's age: group A, 0-4 years; group B, 5-8 years; group C, 9-12 years; and group D, 13-16 years old.

RESULTS. Thirty-one percent (18/58) of the CT examinations were of the chest and 69% (40/58) were of the abdomen. Sixteen percent (9/58) of the CT examinations were combined chest and abdomen. In 22% (2/9) of these combined examinations, tube current was adjusted between the chest and abdomen CT; in one (11%) of these examinations, the tube current was higher for the chest than for the abdomen portion of the CT examination. The mean tube current setting for chest was 213 mA and was 206 mA for the abdomen, with no evident adjustment in tube current based on the age of the patient. Fifty-six percent of the examinations of neonates, infants, or children 8 years old or younger were performed at a collimation of greater than 5 mm and 53% of these examinations were performed using a pitch of 1.0.

CONCLUSION. Pediatric helical CT parameters are not adjusted on the basis of the examination type or the age of the child. In particular, these results suggest that pediatric patients may be exposed to an unnecessarily high radiation dose during body CT.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. L. Ward, K. J. Strauss, C. E. Barnewolt, D. Zurakowski, V. Venkatakrishnan, F. H. Fahey, R. L. Lebowitz, and G. A. Taylor
Pediatric Radiation Exposure and Effective Dose Reduction during Voiding Cystourethrography
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1002 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J A SOYE and A PATERSON
A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 725 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Arch and D. P. Frush
Pediatric Body MDCT: A 5-Year Follow-Up Survey of Scanning Parameters Used by Pediatric Radiologists
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 611 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Y. Lee, P. M. Boiselle, and R. H. Cleveland
Multidetector CT Evaluation of Congenital Lung Anomalies
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 632 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E J HALL and D J BRENNER
Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 81(965): 362 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Herzog, D. M. Mulvihill, S. A. Nguyen, G. Savino, B. Schmidt, P. Costello, T. J. Vogl, and U. J. Schoepf
Pediatric Cardiovascular CT Angiography: Radiation Dose Reduction Using Automatic Anatomic Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1232 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
A. A. Miller
CT Scans on Children: Is This a Problem?
Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 47(3): 220 - 223.
[PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Ronckers, M. M. Doody, J. E. Lonstein, M. Stovall, and C. E. Land
Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 605 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Honnef, J. E. Wildberger, G. Haras, C. Hohl, G. Staatz, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken
Prospective Evaluation of Image Quality with Use of a Patient Image Gallery for Dose Reduction in Pediatric 16-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 467 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
W Mazrani, K McHugh, and P J Marsden
The radiation burden of radiological investigations
Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 1127 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. J. Brenner and E. J. Hall
Computed Tomography -- An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
N. Engl. J. Med., November 29, 2007; 357(22): 2277 - 2284.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. C. Davis and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging
Head Trauma
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2007; 28(8): 1619 - 1621.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. S. Brody, D. P. Frush, W. Huda, R. L. Brent, and and the Section on Radiology
Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography
Pediatrics, September 1, 2007; 120(3): 677 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Fujii, T Aoyama, S Koyama, and C Kawaura
Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Larson, S. B. Rader, H. P. Forman, and L. Z. Fenton
Informing Parents About CT Radiation Exposure in Children: It's OK to Tell Them
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 271 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. L. Hollingsworth, T. T. Yoshizumi, D. P. Frush, F. P. Chan, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, C. R. Lowry, and L. M. Hurwitz
Pediatric Cardiac-Gated CT Angiography: Assessment of Radiation Dose
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 12 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. S. Saleh, S. Patel, M. H. Lee, M. I. Boechat, O. Ratib, C. R. Saraiva, and J. P. Finn
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Chest and Abdomen with Use of Controlled Apnea in Children
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 837 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Kharbanda, G. A. Taylor, and R. G. Bachur
Suspected Appendicitis in Children: Rectal and Intravenous Contrast-enhanced versus Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 520 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A J Van Der Molen, W J H Veldkamp, and J Geleijns
16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 248 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Huda and A. Vance
Patient Radiation Doses from Adult and Pediatric CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 540 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
H. P. Busch and K. Faulkner
Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. K. Saxena, K. Prasad, and R. K. Kaza
Reducing Radiation Dose to Pediatric Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1658 - 1658.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. C. O'Daniel, D. M. Stevens, and D. D. Cody
Reducing Radiation Exposure from Survey CT Scans
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 509 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
K. Ledenius, M. Gustavsson, S. Johansson, F. Stalhammar, J. Soderberg, L. M. Wiklund, and A. Thilander Klang
A method of predicting the image noise in paediatric multi-slice computed tomography images
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 17, 2005; 114(1-3): 313 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. McHugh and P. Kosucu
CT Dose Reduction in Pediatric Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1706 - 1707.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Donnelly
Reducing Radiation Dose Associated with Pediatric CT by Decreasing Unnecessary Examinations
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 655 - 657.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Siegel, B. Schmidt, D. Bradley, C. Suess, and C. Hildebolt
Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric CT: Effect of Technical Factors and Phantom Size and Shape
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 515 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Zhu, J. Yu, and Z. Huang
Low-Dose Chest CT: Optimizing Radiation Protection for Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 809 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. D. Cody, D. M. Moxley, K. T. Krugh, J. C. O'Daniel, L. K. Wagner, and F. Eftekhari
Strategies for Formulating Appropriate MDCT Techniques When Imaging the Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Pediatric Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 849 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Sigal-Cinqualbre, R. Hennequin, H. T. Abada, X. Chen, and J.-F. Paul
Low-Kilovoltage Multi-Detector Row Chest CT in Adults: Feasibility and Effect on Image Quality and Iodine Dose
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. P Prabhu
Ionising radiation in infancy and adult cognitive function: Wrong impression was created by study's publicity
BMJ, March 6, 2004; 328(7439): 582 - 582.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. M. Garcia Pena, E. F. Cook, and K. D. Mandl
Selective Imaging Strategies for the Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 24 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. M. Kosloske, C. L. Love, J. E. Rohrer, J. F. Goldthorn, and S. R. Lacey
The Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children: Outcomes of a Strategy Based on Pediatric Surgical Evaluation
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. M. Ziegler
The Diagnosis of Appendicitis: An Evolving Paradigm
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 130 - 132.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Siegel
Multiplanar and Three-dimensional Multi-Detector Row CT of Thoracic Vessels and Airways in the Pediatric Population
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 641 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
B F Wall
What needs to be done about reducing patient doses from CT? The North American approach: Review of the NCRP Symposium on "Computed Tomography: Patient Dose", Arlington, VA, 6-7 November 2002
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 76(911): 763 - 765.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J Pages, N Buls, and M Osteaux
CT doses in children: a multicentre study
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 76(911): 803 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and N. S. Rosen
Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know
Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 951 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. L. Slovis
Children, Computed Tomography Radiation Dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Concept
Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 971 - 972.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. W. Linton and F. A. Mettler Jr.
National Conference on Dose Reduction in CT, with an Emphasis on Pediatric Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 321 - 329.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Boone, E. M. Geraghty, J. A. Seibert, and S. L. Wootton-Gorges
Dose Reduction in Pediatric CT: A Rational Approach
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 352 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
K McHugh
CT radiation doses
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 743 - 743.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. M. Boiselle, G. Dippolito, J. Copeland, H. Kang, M. Ahmed, D. Weeks, E. Halpern, and S. N. Goldberg
Multiplanar and 3D Imaging of the Central Airways: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Single- Detector Row CT and Multi- Detector Row CT at Differing Tube Currents in Dogs
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 107 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Kalra, C. Wittram, M. M. Maher, A. Sharma, G. B. Avinash, K. Karau, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, S. Saini, and J.-A. Shepard
Can Noise Reduction Filters Improve Low-Radiation-Dose Chest CT Images? Pilot Study
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 257 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Donnelly, J. Lucaya, V. Ozelame, D. P. Frush, P. J. Strouse, T. E. Sumner, and H. J. Paltiel
CT Findings and Temporal Course of Persistent Pulmonary Interstitial Emphysema in Neonates: A Multiinstitutional Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1129 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. M. Campbell Jr. and A. K. Hell-Vocke
Growth of the Thoracic Spine in Congenital Scoliosis After Expansion Thoracoplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 11, 2003; 85(3): 409 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Rogers
Low-Dose CT: How Are We Doing?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 303 - 303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Hollingsworth, D. P. Frush, M. Cross, and J. Lucaya
Helical CT of the Body: A Survey of Techniques Used for Pediatric Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 401 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. L. Fricke, L. F. Donnelly, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, V. Varchena, S. A. Poe, and J. Lucaya
In-Plane Bismuth Breast Shields for Pediatric CT: Effects on Radiation Dose and Image Quality Using Experimental and Clinical Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 407 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C J Kotre and S P Willis
A method for the systematic selection of technique factors in paediatric CT
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2003; 76(901): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Pacharn, S. A. Poe, and L. F. Donnelly
Low-Tube-Current Multidetector CT for Children with Suspected Extrinsic Airway Compression
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1523 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. K. Kalra, S. Prasad, S. Saini, M. A. Blake, J. Varghese, E. F. Halpern, J. T. Rhea, and J. H. Thrall
Clinical Comparison of Standard-Dose and 50% Reduced--Dose Abdominal CT: Effect on Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Frush, C. C. Slack, C. L. Hollingsworth, G. S. Bisset, L. F. Donnelly, J. Hsieh, T. Lavin-Wensell, and J. R. Mayo
Computer-Simulated Radiation Dose Reduction for Abdominal Multidetector CT of Pediatric Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1107 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. F. McNitt-Gray
AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT: Radiation Dose in CT
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1541 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
L. H. Lowe and A. Emami
Think Twice Before Ordering That CT
AAP Grand Rounds, October 1, 2002; 8(4): 41 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Rogers
Dose Reduction in CT: How Low Can We Go?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 299 - 299.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. L. Slovis
The ALARA Concept in Pediatric CT: Myth or Reality?
Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 5 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Frush, B. Soden, K. S. Frush, and C. Lowry
Improved Pediatric Multidetector Body CT Using a Size-Based Color-Coded Format
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 721 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]