|
|
||||||||
Original Report |
1
Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore,
MD 21287, and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
21287.
2
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns
Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
3
Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Bayview Hospital, Baltimore, MD
21224.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether the difference in attenuation frequently noted on unenhanced helical CT scans between a patient's acutely obstructed kidney and the unobstructed kidney is a reliable secondary sign of acute renal obstruction.
CONCLUSION. In 95% of patients with acute renal obstruction, the affected kidney was less dense than the unobstructed kidney. When visually detected by radiologists using CT, this difference in density was at least two standard deviations above normal, making it a reliable secondary sign for acute obstruction.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S J Freeman and H Sells Investigation of loin pain Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 38 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S J Freeman and H Sells Investigation of loin pain Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Goldman, S. Faintuch, S. A. Ajzen, D. M. J. Christofalo, M. P. Araujo, V. Ortiz, M. Srougi, P. J. Kenney, and J. Szejnfeld Diagnostic Value of Attenuation Measurements of the Kidney on Unenhanced Helical CT of Obstructive Ureterolithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1251 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |