|
|
||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Ewha Womans University Mok Dong Hospital, 911-1
Mok-Dong, Yang-Cheon-Ku, Seoul, 158-710 South Korea.
2
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Rd., Box 3808,
Durham, NC 27710.
3
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline
Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare two-dimensional curved multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstructions, routine axial presentations, and combined techniques in the assessment of vascular involvement by pancreatic malignancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. For 44 patients with known pancreatic malignancy a total of 56 arterial phase helical CT scans were obtained. Targeted pancreatic imaging was performed, and reformatted images were generated. Axial source images, reformatted images, and the combination of axial and reformatted images were interpreted independently by three observers. The observers graded the celiac axis, common and proper hepatic, splenic, gastroduodenal, and superior mesenteric arteries for tumor involvement. Grades of vascular involvement were compared by intra- and interobserver variability analyses.
RESULTS. Intraobserver agreement averaged over five vessels was good
between the axial and combined techniques for each individual observer (0.64
0.66), but intraobserver agreement was poor between the
axial and reformatted (
= 0.17 and
= 0.31, respectively) and
the reformatted and combined techniques (
= 0.31 and
= 0.38,
respectively) for two observers. For grading of vascular involvement in each
vessel, intraobserver agreement was good to excellent between the axial and
combined techniques (0.48
0.82). Interobserver agreement
averaged over five vessels was poor for imaging techniques except between
observer 2 and observer 3 on the axial (
= 0.47) and combined
techniques (
= 0.47). For grading of vascular involvement in each
vessel, interobserver agreement for reformatted technique was poor (0.09
0.40).
CONCLUSION. Multiplanar and volume-rendered techniques showed the highest intra- and interobserver variability in grading vascular involvement by pancreatic malignancy. These images should be used in combination with routine axial images to decrease observer variability.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. K. Fishman, D. R. Ney, D. G. Heath, F. M. Corl, K. M. Horton, and P. T. Johnson Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 905 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kobayashi, T. Yamaguchi, T. Ishihara, T. Ohshima, I. Ohno, K. Seza, Y. Shirai, K. Sudo, A. Nakagawa, H. Tadenuma, et al. Assessment of Portal Vein Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer by Fusion 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2005; 24(3): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Cody AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT: Image Processing in CT RadioGraphics, September 1, 2002; 22(5): 1255 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |