AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smitt, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smitt, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, V. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2001; 177:521-524
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Is Diagnostic Review of Radiotherapy-Planning CT Scans Important in the Conformal Therapy Era?

Melanie C. Smitt1 and Vivek K. Mehta

1 Both authors: Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Hospital, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr., Stanford, CA 94305.

OBJECTIVE. Detailed CT scans are often acquired during the radiotherapy planning process. This study was performed to determine the incidence of important benign and cancer-related CT findings on these scans.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. From December 1998 to December 2000, 162 radiotherapy patients who were to be treated curatively underwent treatment planning CT scans on a helical scanner in the radiology department at Washington Hospital, Fremont, CA. All CT scans were prospectively interpreted relative to diagnoses, and reports were dictated for the medical records. The diagnostic reports and records on all patients were reviewed to determine the incidence of previously unknown benign or cancer-related findings, the impacts of such findings on treatment, and the need for additional radiologic studies or procedures on the basis of the CT interpretations.

RESULTS. Incidental benign findings were noted for 32 patients (20%). Potentially important benign findings were noted for three patients: two with aneurysms and one with a possible deep vein thrombosis. Potentially cancer-related findings were reported in 20 patients: a single liver lesion (four patients), multiple liver lesions (two patients), possible or probable lymphadenopathy (11 patients), abnormal soft tissue (one patient), a small-bowel obstruction (one patient), and a breast mass (one patient). After reviewing prior diagnostic studies and obtaining additional recommended studies, the physicians found that only three of the previously unknown findings required further investigation: two aneurysms, which did not require near-term treatment, and one metastatic neck node.

CONCLUSION. Routine diagnostic interpretation of radiotherapy planning scans resulted in few important medical findings and changed patient care for less than 1% of the patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Incidental Findings on Cardiac Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 882 - 884.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.