AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Corcoran, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Corcoran, K. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:283-290
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Contrast-Enhanced CT Colonography in Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma

Feasibility of Simultaneous Evaluation for Metastatic Disease, Local Recurrence, and Metachronous Neoplasia in Colorectal Carcinoma

J. G. Fletcher1, C. Daniel Johnson1, William R. Krueger1,2, David A. Ahlquist3, Heidi Nelson4, Duane Ilstrup5, William Scott Harmsen5 and Kay E. Corcoran1

1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, East-2B, 200 First St., S.W., Rochester, MN 55905.
2 Present address: Department of Internal Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 6900 Georgia Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20307-5001.
3 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
4 Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
5 Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

OBJECTIVE. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography has the potential to detect local recurrence, metachronous disease, and distant metastases in patients with a history of invasive colorectal cancer. The purpose of our study was to determine whether colonic anastomoses prohibit adequate colonic distention on contrast-enhanced CT colonography and to estimate the performance of contrast-enhanced CT colonography in detecting recurrent colorectal carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty patients with a history of resected invasive colorectal carcinoma underwent contrast-enhanced CT colonography and colonoscopy. Colonic distention was graded for different colonic segments. Two radiologists evaluated for the presence of local recurrence, metachronous disease, and metastatic disease. Results were compared with colonoscopy, histology, and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS. Most patients had adequate colonic inflation (37/50, 74%). Eleven of 13 patients with inadequate distention had collapse in the sigmoid colon, usually associated with ileocolic anastomoses. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography detected local recurrences with an accuracy of 94% (95% confidence interval, 83-99%). The accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT colonography for metachronous lesions greater than or equal to 1 cm was 92% (95% confidence interval, 80-98%), but there was only one such lesion, which was missed on initial colonoscopy. Stool, granulation tissue, and inflammation can mimic the CT appearance of local recurrence or metachronous disease and account for false-positive examinations. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography identified five patients with metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION. Suboptimal sigmoid distention can be seen on contrast-enhanced CT colonography, predominantly in patients with right hemicolectomies. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography is a promising method for detecting local recurrence, metachronous disease, and distant metastases in patients with prior invasive colorectal carcinoma. The technique can also serve as a useful adjunct to colonoscopy by detecting local recurrences or metachronous disease that are endoscopically obscure or by serving as a full structural colonic examination when endoscopy is incomplete.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. J. Choi, S. H. Park, S. S. Lee, E. K. Choi, C. S. Yu, H. C. Kim, and J. C. Kim
CT Colonography for Follow-Up After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
C. A Kuehle, J. Langhorst, S. C Ladd, T. Zoepf, M. Nuefer, F. Grabellus, J. Barkhausen, G. Gerken, and T. C Lauenstein
Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population
Gut, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1079 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Lee, S. H. Park, E. K. Choi, S. Y. Kim, M.-J. Kim, K. H. Lee, and Y. H. Kim
Colorectal Polyps on Portal Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT Colonography: Lesion Attenuation and Distinction from Tagged Feces
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 35 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. Mang, A. Maier, C. Plank, C. Mueller-Mang, C. Herold, and W. Schima
Pitfalls in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: A Systematic Approach
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 431 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Akasu, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Fujimoto, S. Ishiguro, S. Yamamoto, S. Fujita, and Y. Moriya
Abdominal Sacral Resection for Posterior Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Carcinoma: Analyses of Prognostic Factors and Recurrence Patterns
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 74 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. C. Silva, E. A. Vens, A. K. Hara, J. G. Fletcher, J. L. Fidler, and C. D. Johnson
Evaluation of Benign and Malignant Rectal Lesions with CT Colonography and Endoscopic Correlation.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 1085 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P Veit, C Kuhle, T Beyer, H Kuehl, C U Herborn, G Borsch, H Stergar, J Barkhausen, A Bockisch, and G Antoch
Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer
Gut, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 68 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. C. Silva, A. K. Hara, J. A. Leighton, and J. P. Heppell
CT Colonography with Intravenous Contrast Material: Varied Appearances of Colorectal Carcinoma
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1321 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Filippone, R. Ambrosini, M. Fuschi, T. Marinelli, D. Genovesi, and L. Bonomo
Preoperative T and N Staging of Colorectal Cancer: Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography--Initial Experience
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Sosna, M. M. Morrin, J. B. Kruskal, R. J. Farrell, I. Nasser, and V. Raptopoulos
Colorectal Neoplasms: Role of Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT Colonography
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 152 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.