HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gollub, M. J. Articles by Thaler, H. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gollub, M. J. Articles by Thaler, H. T. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Quality of Virtual Colonoscopy in Patients Who Have Undergone Radiation Therapy or Surgery

How Successful Are We?

¹ Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021.
² Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.

OBJECTIVE. In patients who have a history of abdominopelvic radiation, surgery, or both, conventional colonoscopy may fail to examine the entire colon. The purpose of this study is to assess whether high-quality virtual colonoscopy can be achieved in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. After colonic cleansing, 61 patients (16 men and 45 women; mean age, 64 years; age range, 27-81 years) underwent 63 virtual colonoscopy examinations after using either single- or multidetector CT (slice thickness, 3.75-5.0 mm; table speed, 1.7-11.25 cm/sec; pitch, 1.5-3.0; and overlapped reconstructions, 1.95-2.5 cm) in supine and prone positions after IV administration of 1 mg of glucagon and rectal air insufflation. Conventional two-dimensional axial images were analyzed on a PACS (picture archiving and communication system) workstation. Two radiologists, who were unaware of patient history, independently evaluated the colonic distention on a 4-point scale (4 = optimal distention) and fluid retention on a 3-point scale (3 = no fluid) for all segments of the colon in patients who were imaged in both the supine and prone positions. Segmental and total average colon scores were calculated.

RESULTS. Forty-one patients (65%; 43 examinations, 67%) underwent prior surgery, radiation, or both (surgery, n = 29; radiation, n = 3; both, n = 11). The average overall colonic distention and fluid retention for this group was 3.13 and 2.38, respectively, versus 3.24 and 2.3 in the control group (p = not significant).

CONCLUSION. High-quality examinations were achieved in patients who had previously undergone radiation, surgery, or both with no clinically significant difference in distention or fluid retention compared with the controls.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Van Uitert, R. M. Summers, J. M. White, K. K. Deshpande, J. R. Choi, and P. J. Pickhardt Temporal and Multiinstitutional Quality Assessment of CT Colonography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1503 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Macari and E. J. Bini CT Colonography: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 819 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]