AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:1469-1476
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Preoperative MRI of Rectal Cancer With and Without Rectal Water Filling: An Intraindividual Comparison

Myeong-Jin Kim1,2, Joon Seok Lim1, Young Taik Oh1, Joo Hee Kim1, Jae-Joon Chung1, Seung Ho Joo1, Nam Kyu Kim3, Kang Young Lee3, Won Ho Kim4 and Ki Whang Kim1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Severance Hospital, and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-ku Shinchondong 134, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea.
2 Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea.
3 Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea.
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine if a rectal distention using warm water may improve the accuracy of MRI for the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixty-two patients with surgically proven rectal carcinomas underwent pelvic MRI before and after a rectal distention by warm water. Four radiologists, who were blinded to the study, reviewed each set of T1- and T2-weighted axial images obtained before and after the rectal distention and scored the image of the tumor. The accuracies for determining the tumor penetration of the outer wall of the rectum and the regional lymph node involvement were compared by analyzing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az).

RESULTS. For all reviewers, the tumor depiction scores were significantly higher in the distended images (3.8–3.9 for reviewers 1–4) than in the nondistended images (3.0–3.2) (p < 0.01). For determining the outer wall penetration, the accuracy of the three reviewers was significantly higher with the rectal distention images than with the nondistended images (p < 0.05). The mean accuracy of the all reviewers was significantly better with the distended images (Az = 0.922) than with the nondistended images (Az = 0.841) (p < 0.05). For determining the presence of regional lymph node involvement, all the reviewers came to similar conclusions in analyzing the two image sets.

CONCLUSION. Rectal distention by water filling may improve the depiction of a primary rectal tumor and the assessment accuracy of a perirectal tumor extension, but it does not improve the accuracy for determining the presence of regional lymph node involvement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, M. W. Lee, G. H. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Sonography Transmission Gel as Endorectal Contrast Agent for Tumor Visualization in Rectal Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 186 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. M. Zhang, H. L. Zhang, D. Yu, Y. Dai, D. Bi, M. R. Prince, and C. Li
3-T MRI of Rectal Carcinoma: Preoperative Diagnosis, Staging, and Planning of Sphincter-Sparing Surgery
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1271 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
I. Maretto, F. Pomerri, S. Pucciarelli, C. Mescoli, E. Belluco, S. Burzi, M. Rugge, P. C. Muzzio, and D. Nitti
The Potential of Restaging in the Prediction of Pathologic Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 455 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim
Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. A. Obuchowski
ROC Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 364 - 372.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.