HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jinzaki, M. Articles by Silverman, S. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jinzaki, M. Articles by Silverman, S. G. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Evaluation of Small ( 3 cm) Renal Masses with MDCT: Benefits of Thin Overlapping Reconstructions

¹ Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.
² Present address: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to determine whether thin overlapping reconstructions using MDCT improve the detection and characterization of small renal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-seven patients were scanned with MDCT using 2.5-mm collimation. Nephrographic phase data were reconstructed in two ways: a standard protocol (5-mm section thickness, no overlap) and an experimental protocol (3-mm section thickness, 50% overlap). Masses were detected and classified into three groups: group 1, measuring less than 20 H on both protocols (classified as cysts on both); group 2, measuring 20 H or greater on standard protocol and less than 20 H on experimental protocol (classified as cysts using experimental protocol only); and group 3, measuring 20 H or greater on both protocols (not classified as cysts using either protocol). Masses 10 mm or larger in group 3 were evaluated further for enhancement. Statistically significant differences between protocols were assessed using an analysis of counts and proportions.

RESULTS. Of 175 detected lesions, 29 (17%) were detected only with the experimental protocol; all but one were smaller than 5 mm. Using the experimental protocol, of 45 masses between 5 and 10 mm, the number of masses that could be characterized as cysts increased from 13 (29%) to 38 (84%). The overall number of indeterminate lesions was reduced from 101 (69%) of 146 lesions detected with the standard protocol to 86 (53%) of 161 lesions detected with the experimental protocol.

CONCLUSION. Using MDCT and thin overlapping reconstructions, renal cysts as small as 5 mm can be diagnosed with more confidence than is possible with standard reconstructions, and the overall number of indeterminate renal masses is reduced.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. G. Silverman, G. M. Israel, B. R. Herts, and J. P. Richie Management of the Incidental Renal Mass Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 16 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Iezzi, A. R. Cotroneo, A. Filippone, F. Di Fabio, M. Santoro, and M. L. Storto MDCT Angiography in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treated with Endovascular Repair: Diagnostic Impact of Slice Thickness on Detection of Endoleaks Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1414 - 1420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Gervais, F. J. McGovern, R. S. Arellano, W. S. McDougal, and P. R. Mueller Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Part 1, Indications, Results, and Role in Patient Management over a 6-Year Period and Ablation of 100 Tumors Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 64 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]