| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030.
2 Department of Sarcoma, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center,
Houston, TX 77030.
3 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, TX 77030.
OBJECTIVE. We correlated changes in tumor density on CT with changes in glucose metabolism, or the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), on FDG PET and sought to develop CT imaging criteria that can be used to objectively evaluate tumor response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who undergo treatment with imatinib mesylate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Using the criteria established by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) group, we selected 173 tumors (in 36 patients) for study. Tumor size and density were determined objectively, and overall tumor response (OTR) was evaluated subjectively on CT images. The changes in these parameters before and after treatment were correlated with changes in SUVmax.
RESULTS. Significant decreases were seen in both tumor density (mean, 12.3 H [16.5%]; p < 0.0001) and SUVmax (mean, 3.43 [64.9%]; p < 0.0001). OTR evaluated subjectively, correlated well with changes in SUVmax (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant association was found between changes in tumor density and changes in SUVmax (p = 0.3088), but 70% (14/20) of the patients with tumors that showed response on FDG PET exhibited at least a partial response by a change in tumor density. Tumor size was found to have decreased significantly 2 months after treatment (p = 0.0070). However, in 75% of the patients, the disease was stable according to the traditional tumor response criteria of RECIST.
CONCLUSION. FDG PET is sensitive and specific for evaluating tumor response but cannot be used in patients whose baseline FDG PET results are negative for tumors. Although subjective evaluation was a better indicator of treatment response than was tumor density alone, the tumor density measurement is a good indicator and provides a reliable quantitative means of monitoring the tumor. RECIST, using only tumor size, was unreliable for monitoring GISTs during the early stage of imatinib mesylate treatment.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Vidal, H. S. Pandha, T. A. Yap, C. L. White, K. Twigger, R. G. Vile, A. Melcher, M. Coffey, K. J. Harrington, and J. S. DeBono A Phase I Study of Intravenous Oncolytic Reovirus Type 3 Dearing in Patients with Advanced Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 7127 - 7137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Choi Response Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 4 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Van den Abbeele The Lessons of GIST--PET and PET/CT: A New Paradigm for Imaging Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 8 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Schuetze, L. H. Baker, R. S. Benjamin, and R. Canetta Selection of Response Criteria for Clinical Trials of Sarcoma Treatment Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. H. Holdsworth, R. D. Badawi, J. B. Manola, M. F. Kijewski, D. A. Israel, G. D. Demetri, and A. D. Van den Abbeele CT and PET: Early Prognostic Indicators of Response to Imatinib Mesylate in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): W324 - W330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Hamstra, A. Rehemtulla, and B. D. Ross Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Biomarker for Treatment Response in Oncology J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4104 - 4109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Griffin, M. E. Gore, and S. A. Sohaib Imaging in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 360 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Faria, C. S. Ng, K. R. Hess, S. Phongkitkarun, J. Szejnfeld, D. Daliani, and C. Charnsangavej CT Quantification of Effects of Thalidomide in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 378 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Choi, C. Charnsangavej, S. C. Faria, H. A. Macapinlac, M. A. Burgess, S. R. Patel, L. L. Chen, D. A. Podoloff, and R. S. Benjamin Correlation of Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Treated at a Single Institution With Imatinib Mesylate: Proposal of New Computed Tomography Response Criteria J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 25(13): 1753 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. H. I. Andtbacka, C. S. Ng, C. L. Scaife, J. N. Cormier, K. K. Hunt, P. W. T. Pisters, R. E. Pollock, R. S. Benjamin, M. A. Burgess, L. L. Chen, et al. Surgical Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Treatment with Imatinib Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K M Linton, M B Taylor, and J A Radford Response evaluation in gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated with imatinib: misdiagnosis of disease progression on CT due to cystic change in liver metastases Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2006; 79(944): e40 - e44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Meyer, S. Aliberti, G. Grignani, M. Aglietta, M. E. Juweid, and B. D. Cheson Positron-emission tomography in cancer therapy. N. Engl. J. Med., May 4, 2006; 354(18): 1958 - 1960. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. T. Zacharia, S. Saini, E. F. Halpern, and J. E. Sumner CT of Colon Cancer Metastases to the Liver Using Modified RECIST Criteria: Determining the Ideal Number of Target Lesions to Measure. Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1067 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Hong, H. Choi, E. M. Loyer, R. S. Benjamin, J. C. Trent, and C. Charnsangavej Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Role of CT in Diagnosis and in Response Evaluation and Surveillance after Treatment with Imatinib. RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 481 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.-H. Ryu, J.-L. Lee, H. M. Chang, T. W. Kim, H. J. Kang, H. J. Sohn, J. S. Lee, and Y.-K. Kang Patterns of Progression in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Treated with Imatinib Mesylate Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 36(1): 17 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Erturk CT Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated with Imatinib Mesylate Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1366 - 1366. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Choi and M. M. Johnson Reply Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1366 - 1367. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. D'Adamo, S. E. Anderson, K. Albritton, J. Yamada, E. Riedel, K. Scheu, G. K. Schwartz, H. Chen, and R. G. Maki Phase II Study of Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcomas J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2005; 23(28): 7135 - 7142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
