AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kataoka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ito, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kataoka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ito, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 184:313-319
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Contrast-Enhanced Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination Compared with Spin-Echo T1-Weighted Imaging of Head and Neck Tumors

Masako Kataoka1, Hiroyuki Ueda2, Takashi Koyama3, Shigeaki Umeoka1, Kaori Togashi1, Ryo Asato4, Shinzo Tanaka4 and Juichi Ito4

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
3 Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
4 Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. Volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) is a relatively new gradient-echo MR sequence that is capable of shortening acquisition times and is reported to be useful in abdominal and brain imaging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using VIBE images as a substitute for conventional postcontrast spin-echo T1-weighted images in the assessment of head and neck tumors.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The subjects were 33 consecutive patients referred for MRI for preoperative assessment of head and neck tumors. After administration of gadodiamide hydrate, images were obtained using postcontrast fat-saturated VIBE sequence for a 35-sec acquisition time and then a postcontrast fat-saturated spin-echo T1-weighted sequence for a 269-sec acquisition time ({approx} 4.5 min). Quantitative comparisons of the two methods were made by calculating signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios for both methods, and qualitative comparisons were made on the basis of the scoring of three independent reviewers concerning image quality and tumor conspicuity.

RESULTS. No significant difference was detected quantitatively between the two sequences. However, in qualitative assessments, the degree of image degradation by artifacts was significantly smaller for VIBE images than for spin-echo T1-weighted images (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION. In preoperative evaluations of head and neck tumors, the postcontrast VIBE sequence is capable of decreasing acquisition time without degrading image quality or tumor conspicuity; thus, it is an acceptable alternative to postcontrast spin-echo T1-weighted imaging.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. H. Choi, J. M. Lee, N. C. Yu, K.-S. Suh, J.-J. Jang, S. H. Kim, and B. I. Choi
Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplantation Candidates: Detection with Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.