| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.
OBJECTIVE. We compare sensitivities of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo sequences in the evaluation of meniscal tears. Furthermore, we reevaluate the results from prior studies comparing these two sequences to understand why there are differing conclusions regarding the efficacy of fast spin-echo sequences as a commensurate replacement for conventional spin-echo sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. We used records from a control group of 64 patients (128 menisci) who had undergone arthroscopy to determine the sensitivity of conventional spinecho sequences for detecting meniscal tears. Two hundred sixteen consecutive patients (432 menisci) were then imaged using conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo sequences to evaluate for meniscal tears. Both sequences were proton density-weighted with fat suppression.
RESULTS. Of the 432 menisci, 170 tears were detected on conventional spin-echo imaging. Only 128 tears were detected on the fast spin-echo sequence. The sensitivities of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo imaging were found to be 93% and 80%, respectively. In addition, findings from conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo sequences were discordant for 72 menisci (17%, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION. The sensitivities of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo imaging for detecting meniscal tears have been shown to be greater than 90% and approximately 80%, respectively. However, some authors advocate substituting conventional spin-echo imaging with fast spin-echo imaging. We urge the abandonment of fast spin-echo imaging for evaluating meniscal tears because a loss of greater than 10% in sensitivity is unacceptable.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Hawker, J. Guan, A. Judge, and P. Dieppe Knee Arthroscopy in England and Ontario: Patterns of Use, Changes Over Time, and Relationship to Total Knee Replacement J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2008; 90(11): 2337 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. De Smet, D. H. Nathan, B. K. Graf, B. A. Haaland, and J. P. Fine Clinical and MRI Findings Associated with False-Positive Knee MR Diagnoses of Medial Meniscal Tears Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. De Smet and R. Mukherjee Clinical, MRI, and Arthroscopic Findings Associated with Failure to Diagnose a Lateral Meniscal Tear on Knee MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. E. Gold, R. F. Busse, C. Beehler, E. Han, A. C. S. Brau, P. J. Beatty, and C. F. Beaulieu Isotropic MRI of the Knee with 3D Fast Spin-Echo Extended Echo-Train Acquisition (XETA): Initial Experience Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1287 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. De Smet and M. J. Tuite Use of the "Two-Slice-Touch" Rule for the MRI Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 911 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. R. Ramnath, T. Magee, N. Wasudev, and R. Murrah Accuracy of 3-T MRI using fast spin-echo technique to detect meniscal tears of the knee. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 221 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
