AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bessoud, B.
Right arrow Articles by Doenz, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bessoud, B.
Right arrow Articles by Doenz, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1800
AJR 2006; 186:779-785
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Nonoperative Management of Traumatic Splenic Injuries: Is There a Role for Proximal Splenic Artery Embolization?

Bertrand Bessoud1,2, Alban Denys1,2, Jean-Marie Calmes3, David Madoff4, Salah Qanadli1,2, Pierre Schnyder1,2 and Francesco Doenz1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Bicêtre Hospital, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre 94270, France.
2 Department of Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
3 Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
4 Present address: Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate our experience with transcatheter proximal (i.e., main) splenic artery embolization (TPSAE) in the nonsurgical management of patients with grade III–V splenic injuries, according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) guidelines, and patients with splenic injuries associated with CT evidence of active contrast extravasation or blush (or cases meeting both criteria).

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The records of patients with traumatic splenic injuries admitted during a 52-month period were retrospectively reviewed for patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), RBC transfusion requirements, AAST splenic injury CT grade, presence of active contrast extravasation or blush on CT examination, and amount of hemoperitoneum on CT examination. Demographics, CT findings, transfusion requirements, and outcome were compared using the Student's t test or chi-square test in patients undergoing standard nonoperative management and nonoperative management TPSAE—that is, TPSAE followed by nonoperative management.

RESULTS. Of the 79 identified patients with splenic trauma, 67 were managed nonoperatively. Thirty-seven patients (28 men, nine women; mean age, 40 years; mean ISS, 28.8) underwent nonoperative management TPSAE and 30 patients (27 men, three women; mean age, 37 years; mean ISS, 25.1) underwent nonoperative management. Age, sex, and ISS were not significantly different between the two groups. TPSAE was always technically feasible. Splenic injuries were significantly more severe in the nonoperative management TPSAE group than in the nonoperative management group with respect to the mean splenic injury AAST CT grade (3.7 vs 2, respectively; p < 0.0001), active contrast extravasation or blush (38% [14/37] vs 3% [1/30], respectively; p = 0.0005), and hemoperitoneum grade (1.6 vs 0.8, respectively; p = 0.0006). Secondary splenectomy rate was lower in the nonoperative management TPSAE group (2.7% [1/37] vs 10% [3/30]). No procedure-related complications were encountered during early and delayed clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION. TPSAE is a feasible and safe adjunct to observation in the nonoperative management of severe traumatic splenic injuries. The secondary splenectomy rate using nonoperative management TPSAE (2.7%) is among the lowest reported despite a selection of severe injuries.

Keywords: abdomen • embolization • interventional radiology • spleen • trauma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R L HAMERS, F G VAN DEN BERG, and A B J GROENEVELD
Acute necrotizing pancreatitis following inadvertent extensive splenic artery embolisation for trauma
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): e11 - e14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. Tang, H. Zhang, F. Lv, W. Li, Y. Luo, Y. Wang, and J. Li
Percutaneous Injection Therapy for Blunt Splenic Trauma Guided by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 925 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.