HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blankenbaker, D. G. Articles by Fine, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blankenbaker, D. G. Articles by Fine, J. P. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Axial Rotation of the Lumbar Spinal Motion Segments Correlated with Concordant Pain on Discography: A Preliminary Study

¹ Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Clinical Science Center-E3/311, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252.
² Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
³ Department of Statistics and Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792-3252.

OBJECTIVE. One possible cause of back pain in patients with intervertebral disk degeneration is decreased stability of the motion segment. Axial rotations between lumbar spinal vertebrae can be measured noninvasively with CT. We tested the hypothesis that larger axial rotations are found in motion segments with disks that test positive for concordant pain, which is considered by some investigators to be a reasonable, accurate predictor of spinal instability.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Between October 2002 and March 2004, all patients undergoing discography were evaluated for inclusion in the study, with the approval of the institutional review board. All patients in whom concordant pain was detected at discography were enrolled in the study. The patients were placed supine in the CT scanner on a table that rotated the pelvis 8° clockwise and then counterclockwise with respect to the thorax. CT images were obtained with the patient in the two positions of rotation. An automated program calculated the amount of rotation between each lumbar vertebra as a result of the table rotations. Rotations were stratified by disk level and by disk classification (concordant pain, nonconcordant pain, no significant pain).

RESULTS. We recorded the axial rotations of 94 disks in 16 consecutive patients (10 women, six men; age range, 26–53 years) after two disks were excluded because of a previous fusion. There were 68 normal disks by MRI and discography, six disks with nonconcordant pain, and 20 disks with concordant pain. Rotation averaged 0.6° for the normal disks, 1.4° for disks with nonconcordant pain, and 1.8° for disks with concordant pain. The differences were significant (analysis of variance, p < 0.001). Disks at L3–L4 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.2°, whereas disks classified as normal or nonconcordant pain rotated on average 0.7° (significant at p = 0.005). Disks at L4–L5 with concordant pain rotated on average 1.9°, and those without concordant pain rotated on average 1.4° (significant at p = 0.05). Disks with concordant pain at L5–S1 had an average rotation of 2.2°, whereas disks without concordant pain had an average rotation of 1.5° (marginally significant difference at p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION. Concordant pain at discography predicts increased axial rotation at a lumbar disk level.

Keywords: CT • CT technique • discography • spine • vertebra

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?