|
|
||||||||
Perspective |
1 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke North, Rm. 1417,
Box 3808, Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710.
2 Siemens Medical Solutions, USA, Cary, NC 27519.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our article is to describe the underlying physics concepts of abdominal MRI at 3.0 T and their impact on signal-to-noise ratio, susceptibility artifacts, chemical shift artifacts, and dielectric effects.
CONCLUSION. Abdominal MR sequence protocols optimized for 1.5-T scanners should not be transferred to 3.0 T without substantial modification. In addition, specific patient groupsfor example, large patients with ascitesare not well suited to undergo an abdominal MRI study at 3.0 T.
Keywords: abdominal imaging field strength MRI MRI technique physics
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. T. Schindera, B. J. Soher, D. M. Delong, B. M. Dale, and E. M. Merkle Effect of Echo Time Pair Selection on Quantitative Analysis for Adrenal Tumor Characterization with In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MR Imaging: Initial Experience Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 140 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Akisik, K. Sandrasegaran, A. M. Aisen, C. Lin, and C. Lall Abdominal MR Imaging at 3.0 T RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1433 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Barth, M. P. Smith, I. Pedrosa, R. E. Lenkinski, and N. M. Rofsky Body MR Imaging at 3.0 T: Understanding the Opportunities and Challenges RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1445 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Sher Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1462 - 1464. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |