AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Horgan, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Horgan, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0138
AJR 2006; 186:1551-1559
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Prospective Multicenter Trial Evaluating a Novel Method of Characterizing Focal Liver Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Sonography

Edward Leen1, Piercarlo Ceccotti1, Christina Kalogeropoulou1, Wilson J. Angerson2, Susan J. Moug2 and Paul G. Horgan2

1 Department of Radiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, Scotland G31 2ER.
2 Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value and potential impact of SonoVue-enhanced sonography in the characterization of focal liver lesions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This study included 127 patients with 82 malignant and 52 benign lesions in the liver. Contrast-enhanced sonography was performed using nonlinear imaging modes at low mechanical index (0.1-0.3) to enable real-time visualization of arterial, portal, and late-phase enhancement. Digital recordings of unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography were reviewed by on-site investigators and two off-site blinded interpreters. The final diagnosis was based on consensus interpreting of all examinations by another two expert observers with access to CT, MRI, and histologic data; the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography in identifying the lesion as benign, malignant, or indeterminate and as actual tumor type was compared with baseline sonography.

RESULTS. For on-site investigators, contrast-enhanced sonography reduced the number of indeterminate diagnoses by 67% and improved the sensitivity and specificity to 90.2% and 80.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). For off-site interpreters, contrast-enhanced sonography reduced the number of indeterminate diagnoses by 51-56% (p < 0.001); significantly improved sensitivity and specificity to 90.8-95.4% and 83.7-89.8%, respectively (p < 0.001); eliminated observers' variability (kappa coefficient: 0.66-0.77); and showed no significant difference in all comparisons in the analysis of lesions measuring less than 1.5 cm, 1.5-2.5 cm, and all sizes combined. Contrast-enhanced sonography did not rely on availability of clinical history to enable the diagnoses, and it reduced the need for further imaging investigations 23.7% to 90.4%.

CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced sonography improves the characterization of focal liver lesions and may limit the need for further investigations.

Keywords: contrast-enhanced sonography • liver


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
P. Ricci, V. Cantisani, M. D'Onofrio, D. Sahani, E. Pagliara, F. Calliada, E. Mehmet, K. Sanjeva, N. Faccioli, R. Pozzi-Mucelli, et al.
Behavior of Hepatocellular Adenoma on Real-time Low-Mechanical Index Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography With a Second-Generation Contrast Agent
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2008; 27(12): 1719 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. K. Kim, H.-J. Jang, P. N. Burns, J. Murphy-Lavallee, and S. R. Wilson
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatic Adenoma: Differentiation with Low-Mechanical-Index Contrast-Enhanced Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 58 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Lanka, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in a Tertiary Clinical Practice
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2007; 26(12): 1703 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Quaia, M. D'Onofrio, P. Cabassa, F. Vecchiato, S. Caffarri, F. Pittiani, K. M. Wittkowski, and M. A. Cova
Diagnostic Value of Hepatocellular Nodule Vascularity After Microbubble Injection for Characterizing Malignancy in Patients with Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1474 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. Murphy-Lavallee, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, P. N. Burns, and S. R. Wilson
Are Metastases Really Hypovascular in the Arterial Phase?: The Perspective Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1545 - 1556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
O. Catalano, V. Migaleddu, E. Quaia, and G. Caruso
Terminology for Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: A Practical Glossary
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 717 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. R. Wilson, H.-J. Jang, T. K. Kim, and P. N. Burns
Diagnosis of Focal Liver Masses on Ultrasonography: Comparison of Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced Scans
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 775 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.