AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tongdee, R.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tongdee, R.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0388
AJR 2006; 186:1746-1753
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Hybrid Peripheral 3D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of Calf and Foot Vasculature

Ranista Tongdee1,2, Vamsi R. Narra1, Gary McNeal3, Charles F. Hildebolt1, Fadi El-Merhi1,4, Glenn Foster1 and Jeffrey J. Brown1

1 Department of Body MRI, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and Washington University in St. Louis, Washington University Medical Center, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63110-1076.
2 Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
3 Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA 19355.
4 University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to describe hybrid peripheral (HyPer) 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) using sagittal acquisition with parallel imaging of the calf and foot station. The benefit of a dedicated sagittal 3D CE-MRA acquisition of the calf and foot was evaluated by assessing the degree of venous contamination and its diagnostic quality compared with standard bolus chase 3D CE-MRA alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-three patients (99 legs) were scanned with a 1.5-T MR system equipped with a dedicated bilateral lower extremity phased-array coil. First, high-resolution 3D CE-MRA images of the calves and feet were obtained using two separate sagittal slabs with parallel imaging, with a resulting voxel size of 1.4 x 1.0 x 1.0 mm3. Second, standard bolus chase 3D CE-MRA was performed from the abdomen and pelvis station to the calf-foot station. Images were interpreted by two radiologists. The calf-foot arterial trees were divided into 12 segments. Each segment was characterized as diagnostic or nondiagnostic. The degree of venous contamination was assessed as interfering with the diagnosis or not. Paired Student's t test and Wilcoxon's signed rank test were used to test for statistically significant differences between the techniques.

RESULTS. For the left leg (n = 48), the mean number (± SD) of diagnosed arterial segments for HyPer 3D CE-MRA was 9.2 ± 2.3 and for bolus chase 3D CE-MRA, 7.1 ± 4.2 (p ≤ 0.0004). For the right leg (n = 51), the corresponding values were 9.4 ± 2.2 and 7.6 ± 3.5 (p ≤ 0.0005), respectively. For bolus chase 3D CE-MRA, venous contamination interfered with the diagnosis in 24 of 99 legs, whereas with HyPer 3D CE-MRA, there was no interference. Selective analysis of the dorsalis pedis arteries showed that the number of diagnostic vessels was 62 (62.6%) of 99 for HyPer 3D CE-MRA and 13 (13.1%) of 99 for bolus chase 3D CE-MRA.

CONCLUSION. HyPer 3D CE-MRA is an alternative method for time-resolved high-resolution peripheral CE-MRA in evaluating the trifurcation and feet vessels with no venous contamination.

Keywords: calf • extremities • foot • MR angiography • MR arteriography • MRI • parallel imaging • peripheral vascular disease


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Lin, Z.-Q. Zhang, J.-Y. Sun, Z.-M. Fan, and B. Lu
Low Injection Rate for 3D Moving-Table Bolus-Chase MR Angiography: Initial Experience with 3-T Imaging to Allay Venous Contamination in the Calf
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1734 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Ersoy and F. J. Rybicki
MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1675 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Bosch, K.-F. Kreitner, M. F. Peirano, S. Thurner, K. Shamsi, and E. C. Parsons Jr.
Safety and Efficacy of Gadofosveset-Enhanced MR Angiography for Evaluation of Pedal Arterial Disease: Multicenter Comparative Phase 3 Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 179 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.