AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boll, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gilkeson, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boll, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Gilkeson, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1781
AJR 2006; 186:S379-S386
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Synergy of MDCT and Cine MRI for the Evaluation of Cardiac Motility

Daniel T. Boll1,2, Andrea S. Bossert2, Andrik J. Aschoff2, Martin H. Hoffmann2 and Robert C. Gilkeson1

1 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106.
2 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to validate the feasibility of the synergistic use of cardiac MR and CT data sets for ventricular motility analysis and to correlate measurement variability with underlying heart rate.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty patients underwent concurrent ECG-gated MDCT and MRI for evaluation of ventricular motility, expressed as ventricular wall thickening and motion. Initially, individual measurement repetition series were analyzed by determining intraobserver variability and detecting intraobserver bias related to heart rates. Subsequently, absolute measurement differences of CT or MR data were statistically evaluated. Finally, absolute measurement differences were correlated with underlying heart rates by curve estimation regression.

RESULTS. Analysis of measurement reproducibility proved that data variability was dependent on only the anatomic localization of the analyzed ventricular segment, not on the imaging technique used or underlying heart rate, in normofrequent patients. Comparing MR and CT image data sets, no statistically significant differences were identified when ventricular motility was evaluated based on data sets of either imaging technique in normofrequent patients. Tachycardic frequencies, above 100 beats per minute, led to exponential error propagation due to insufficient temporal resolution of the current CT technology.

CONCLUSION. This study proved that cardiac motility assessment based on ECG-gated CT and MR data sets resulted in comparable ventricular function results for normofrequent patients; however, the high spatial resolution of cardiac MDCT cannot compensate for the lack of temporal resolution in patients with tachycardia, thus emphasizing the necessity of reporting ventricular motility analysis results in combination with heart rate to allow consideration of this possible cause for measurement variation.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • cine MRI • MDCT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Cardiac Imaging 2006
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S337 - S340.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.