AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shetty, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Aquino, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shetty, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Aquino, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0468
AJR 2006; 187:1349-1356
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Significance of Incidental Thyroid Lesions Detected on CT: Correlation Among CT, Sonography, and Pathology

Sanjay K. Shetty1,2, Michael M. Maher1, Peter F. Hahn1, Elkan F. Halpern1 and Suzanne L. Aquino1

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, FND 214, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of malignancy in incidental abnormalities of the thyroid gland detected on CT and to determine the relative accuracy of characterizing these abnormalities on CT as compared with sonography and pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We searched our department's computerized clinical database for all thoracic and cervical CT scans in which a new abnormality was incidentally identified in the thyroid gland from 1998-2001. Two hundred thirty patients with abnormal findings in the gland on CT subsequently underwent thyroid sonography, and 118 of the 230 patients underwent a diagnostic biopsy or resection. CT and sonographic images were directly reviewed to identify imaging features of each thyroid abnormality, including the location, size, appearance, and presence or absence of calcifications. Associations were evaluated using Fisher's exact test of significance and the Student's t test. The overall rate of malignant and potentially malignant lesions among these incidental abnormalities of the thyroid gland was calculated.

RESULTS. CT findings matched the sonographic characterization in 122 patients (53.0%), correctly identified the dominant nodule but missed multinodularity in 69 (30.0%) patients, and underestimated the number of nodules in 24 (10.4%) patients. CT overestimated the number of nodules in 5 (2.2%) patients and was false-positive for lesions in 10 patients (4.3%). Ninetyone patients with a single or dominant nodule on CT had pathologic correlation: 7 nodules were malignant, 17 showed malignant potential, and 67 were benign. Of 27 patients with multinodular or enlarged thyroid glands on CT and histopathologic correlation, 2 lesions were malignant and 25 benign. The presence of punctate calcifications on CT significantly correlated to the presence of microcalcifications on sonography (p < 0.02). Benign nodules were significantly smaller (mean, 2.16 ± 1.01 cm; range, 0.6-4.5 cm) than malignant and potentially malignant nodules (mean, 2.79 ± 0.99 cm; range, 0.7-4.6 cm) (p = 0.01). Patients 35 years or younger who had a thyroid lesion on CT were more likely to have malignancy (p < 0.01). Overall, among incidentally detected lesions of the thyroid gland, there was at least a 3.9% rate of malignancy (95% CI: 1.8-7.3%) and 7.4% rate of malignant potential (95% CI: 4.4-11.6%).

CONCLUSION. There is at least an 11.3% prevalence of malignant or potentially malignant lesions among incidental thyroid abnormalities detected on CT. Patients 35 years or younger who have incidental abnormalities have a significantly greater rate of malignancy. No CT feature reliably distinguishes benign from malignant lesions in the thyroid gland. CT underestimates the number of nodules relative to sonography, which suggests that sonography is a useful adjunctive test after the incidental detection of a thyroid abnormality on CT.

Keywords: CT • head and neck imaging • sonography • thyroid gland


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. G. Lohan, A. Tomasian, R. Saleh, M. Krishnam, and J. P. Finn
Hypervascular Thyroid Nodules on Time-Resolved MR Angiography at 3 T: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): W255 - W260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. C. Howlett and A. Speirs
The Thyroid Incidentaloma Ignore or Investigate?
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1367 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Relevance of Thyroid Nodules Found Incidentally on CT
Journal Watch (General), January 2, 2007; 2007(102): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.