AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0078
AJR 2007; 188:313-317
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Determination of Optimal Timing Window for Pulmonary Artery MDCT Angiography

Chang Hyun Lee1, Jin Mo Goo1, Hyun Ju Lee1, Kwang Gi Kim1, Jung-Gi Im1 and Kyongtae T. Bae2

1 Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
2 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the optimal timing window for pulmonary artery MDCT angiography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively studied 150 patients. Routine chest CT scans were acquired using 1.3 mL/kg of contrast medium (370 mg I/mL) that was injected at a fixed injection duration of 30 seconds, followed by a 10-second saline chase. To measure early contrast enhancement, sequential monitoring scans were obtained every 2 seconds over a fixed level of the main pulmonary artery 5 seconds after the start of the injection. Then helical diagnostic scans were obtained at three different predetermined scanning delays (group A, 25 seconds; group B, 35 seconds; and group C, 45 seconds after the start of the injection). Time-enhancement curves; time to reach 100 H, 200 H, and peak enhancement; and enhancement duration greater than 200 H of the pulmonary artery were measured from the monitoring scan. Contrast enhancements of the pulmonary artery and descending aorta and vascular artifacts were assessed from the diagnostic scan.

RESULTS. Times to reach 100 H and 200 H at the pulmonary artery were mean 11 ± 2.5 (SD) seconds and 16 ± 3.0 seconds, respectively. Pulmonary artery enhancement duration of greater than 200 H was 25 ± 2.7 seconds (only obtained in group C). Mean time to peak enhancement (335 ± 62 H) at the pulmonary artery was 37 seconds. Mean enhancement measured on the diagnostic scan was 294 ± 43 H, group A; 208 ± 48 H, group B; and 157 ± 15 H, group C for the pulmonary artery, and 240 ± 42 H, group A; 277 ± 49 H, group B; and 172 ± 29 H, group C for the aorta (p < 0.01). Artifacts were noted in the superior vena cava (group A, 96.7%; group B, 18.3%; and group C, 0%) and in the subclavian vein (group A, 93.5%; group B, 38.7%; and group C, 0%), (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION. With our study protocol of a 30-second injection and 10-second saline flush, the optimal temporal window to achieve pulmonary artery enhancement greater than 200 H was from 16 seconds to 41 seconds after the start of the injection.

Keywords: aorta • chest • contrast media • CT • CT technique


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer
CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.