AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carney, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carney, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1718
AJR 2007; 188:385-392
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Factors Associated with Imaging and Procedural Events Used to Detect Breast Cancer After Screening Mammography

Patricia A. Carney1,2, Linn A. Abraham3, Diana L. Miglioretti3, K. Robin Yabroff4, Edward A. Sickles5, Diana S. M. Buist3, Claudia J. Kasales1, Berta M. Geller6, Robert D. Rosenberg7, Mark B. Dignan8, Donald L. Weaver9, Karla Kerlikowske10 for the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

1 Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 03756.
2 Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239.
3 Group Health Cooperative, Center for Health Studies, Seattle, WA 98101.
4 Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.
5 Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115.
6 Health Promotions Research, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401.
7 Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131.
8 Cooper Institute, Lakewood, CO 80401.
9 Department of Pathology, University of Vermont School of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05405.
10 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to characterize the type and frequency of diagnostic evaluations after screening mammography and to summarize their association with the likelihood of biopsy and subsequent breast cancer diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The data source was 584,470 women with no previous breast cancer from six states in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. In this observational study, we linked data from 1,207,631 routine screening mammograms performed between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2002, to data on additional imaging, interventional procedures, and biopsy outcome (benign or malignant). Additional examinations were categorized into diagnostic mammography, sonography, or both. Events were further subdivided by whether they were performed on the same day as the screening examination and whether patients reported breast symptoms. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between additional evaluation performed and the likelihood of biopsy and the likelihood of subsequent breast cancer diagnosis after adjustment for patient and screening mammographic characteristics.

RESULTS. Most (92%) of the screening examinations did not include additional imaging. The probability of biopsy ranged from 0.4% for examinations with no follow-up to 20.1% for those with diagnostic mammography and sonography on the same day as screening among women without symptoms and from 2.1% for those with no follow-up to 18.9% for those with diagnostic mammography and sonography on a day different from screening among women with symptoms. Thirty percent of women without symptoms who underwent biopsy had cancer, whereas 27.1% of women with symptoms who underwent biopsy had cancer. Women who underwent biopsy after screening mammography with diagnostic mammography and sonography on the same day had the highest probability of breast cancer (37.6% among women without symptoms, 36.4% among women with symptoms), whereas those who underwent only sonography performed at a later date had the lowest probability of breast cancer (11.9% among women without symptoms, 17.1% among women with symptoms).

CONCLUSION. Women who undergo screening mammography followed by diagnostic mammography and sonography have a high probability of undergoing biopsy and having the biopsy result of breast cancer when follow-up imaging is performed on the same day as screening mammography whether or not breast symptoms are present. Biopsy performed after sonography in the absence of diagnostic mammography had a low yield of breast cancer.

Keywords: breast biopsy • breast cancer screening • breast neoplasms • mammography • sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. P. Forman
Back to the Beginning
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 295 - 296.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.