HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, P. T. Articles by Fishman, E. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson, P. T. Articles by Fishman, E. K. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

64-MDCT Angiography of the Coronary Arteries: Nationwide Survey of Patient Preparation Practice

¹ All authors: The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St., Rm. 3251, Baltimore, MD 21287.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current practice of patient preparation for 64-MDCT angiography (CTA) of the coronary arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sites in the United States that perform 64-MDCT coronary angiography were surveyed by mail in 2006. Information requested included physician specialty; experience level; details about patient preparation, including the use, dose, route, and timing of premedication; and acceptable heart rate and rhythm. A total of 142 surveys were analyzed, with comparison of parameters across specialties (radiology, cardiology, or shared) and experience levels.

RESULTS. All facets of the study (premedication, data acquisition, cardiac interpretation) are performed exclusively by radiologists in 49% of sites and by cardiologists in 14%. All sites administer β-blockers. Target heart rate was reported as 65 beats per minute (bpm) by 89% of responders. Despite most centers aiming for a heart rate of 65 bpm, the maximum allowable heart rate is > 65 bpm in 80% of centers. Patients with arrhythmia are scanned in at least 25% of sites. Most sites (84%) administer nitroglycerin. Significant differences between specialties were noted for experience levels, timing and route of β-blocker administration, and for target heart rate. The likelihood of scanning in the setting of arrhythmia and β-blocker timing correlated with experience levels.

CONCLUSION. These 64-MDCT coronary artery data from 2006 reveal consensus for a range of patient preparation parameters. Use of β-blockers and nitroglycerin is routine, and the target heart rate is usually 65 bpm. However, differences were noted for β-blocker protocols and acceptable heart rate and rhythm, and some differences in practice are associated with experience level and specialty.

Keywords: coronary artery • CT • CT angiography • practice • questionnaire

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Stanley Reflections on This Month's Wealth of Content Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 555 - 555. [Full Text] [PDF]