AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, R.-S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, M.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, R.-S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2974
AJR 2008; 190:923-928
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Coronary Arterial Calcification on Low-Dose Ungated MDCT for Lung Cancer Screening: Concordance Study with Dedicated Cardiac CT

Ming-Ting Wu1,2, Pinchen Yang3, Yi-Luan Huang1,2, Jian-Shyong Chen2, Chiung-Chen Chuo2, Chinson Yeh4 and Ruey-Sheng Chang2,5

1 Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
2 Section of Thoracic and Circulation Imaging, Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung 1st Rd., Kaohsiung, Taiwan 813, Republic of China.
3 Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
4 Department of Mechanical and Electromechanical Engineering, National Sun-Yat Sen University, Kaohsiung, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
5 Department of Radiology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China.

OBJECTIVE. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is frequently detected on low-dose ungated MDCT performed for lung cancer screening. We aimed to determine the concordance of CAC scores on low-dose ungated and regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The subjects were 513 patients consecutively registered for health screening and undergoing both low-dose ungated (120 kVp, 20 mAs) and regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT (120 kVp, 150 mAs, retrospective ECG gating). The first 30 cases were used for protocol optimization and a training session. Agatston score on regular-dose ECG-gated and low-dose ungated MDCT in the other 483 cases (320 men; mean age, 62.2 ± 13.2 [SD] years) was calculated by two observers in a blinded manner. Interobserver and intertechnique scoring variability and concordance were calculated.

RESULTS. The mean of interobserver scoring variability for regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT was 3.6% and for low-dose ungated MDCT was 9.6%. Regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT depicted CAC in 221 (46%) of the subjects. With low-dose ungated MDCT, observers 1 and 2, respectively, had five and seven false-positive and five and four false-negative predictions. All the miscategorized scores were 12 or less. The negative predictive values of CAC on low-dose ungated MDCT were 98% and 99% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. For patients with CAC, the mean intertechnique scoring variability was 40–43%. For all 483 subjects, the intertechnique concordance of the four major score ranks (0, 1–100, 101–400, > 400) was high ({kappa} = 0.89 for the two observers).

CONCLUSION. Low-dose ungated MDCT with an optimized protocol is reliable for prediction of the presence of CAC and categorization of the four major Agatston score ranks. This technique may be useful for coronary artery disease risk stratification of persons undergoing low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening.

Keywords: coronary artery calcification • CT • lung cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.