HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Dang, P. A. Articles by Dreyer, K. J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dang, P. A. Articles by Dreyer, K. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Extraction of Recommendation Features in Radiology with Natural Language Processing: Exploratory Study

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 25 New Chardon St., Ste. 400E, Boston, MA 02114.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to validate a natural language processing program for extraction of recommendation features, such as recommended time frames and imaging technique, from electronic radiology reports and to assess patterns of recommendation features in a large database of radiology reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study was performed on a radiology reports database covering the years 1995–2004. From this database, 120 reports with and without recommendations were selected and randomized. Two radiologists independently classified these reports according to presence of recommendations, time frame, and imaging technique suggested for follow-up or repeated examinations. The natural language processing program then was used to classify the reports according to the same criteria used by the radiologists. The accuracy of classification of recommendation features was determined. The program then was used to determine the patterns of recommendation features for different patients and imaging features in the entire database of 4,211,503 reports.

RESULTS. The natural language processing program had an accuracy of 93.2% (82/88) for identifying the imaging technique recommended by the radiologists for further evaluation. Categorization of recommended time frames in the reports with the 88 recommendations obtained with the program resulted in 83 (94.3%) accurate classifications and five (5.7%) inaccurate classifications. Recommendations of CT were most common (27.9%, 105,076 of 376,918 reports) followed by those for MRI (17.8%). In most (85.4%, 322,074/376,918) of the reports with imaging recommendations, however, radiologists did not specify the time frame.

CONCLUSION. Accurate determination of recommended imaging techniques and time frames in a large database of radiology reports is possible with a natural language processing program. Most imaging recommendations are for high-cost but more accurate radiologic studies.

Keywords: radiology practice • recommendations • recommended imaging techniques

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?