AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.2431
AJR 2009; 193:W397-W402
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Performance of Radiologists in Detection of Small Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs: Effect of Rib Suppression With a Massive-Training Artificial Neural Network

Seitaro Oda1, Kazuo Awai1, Kenji Suzuki2, Yumi Yanaga1, Yoshinori Funama3, Heber MacMahon2 and Yasuyuki Yamashita1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
3 Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. A massive-training artificial neural network is a nonlinear pattern recognition tool used to suppress rib opacity on chest radiographs while soft-tissue contrast is maintained. We investigated the effect of rib suppression with a massive-training artificial neural network on the performance of radiologists in the detection of pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We used 60 chest radiographs; 30 depicted solitary pulmonary nodules, and 30 showed no nodules. A stratified random-sampling scheme was used to select the images from the standard digital image database developed by the Japanese Society of Radiologic Technology. The mean diameter of the 30 pulmonary nodules was 14.7 ± 4.1 (SD) mm. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate observer performance in the detection of pulmonary nodules first on the chest radiographs without and then on the radiographs with rib suppression. Seven board-certified radiologists and five radiology residents participated in this observer study.

RESULTS. For all 12 observers, the mean values of the area under the best-fit receiver operating characteristic curve for images without and with rib suppression were 0.816 ± 0.077 and 0.843 ± 0.074; the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.019). The mean areas under the curve for images without and with rib suppression were 0.848 ± 0.059 and 0.883 ± 0.050 for the seven board-certified radiologists (p = 0.011) and 0.770 ± 0.081 and 0.788 ± 0.074 for the five radiology residents (p = 0.310).

CONCLUSION. In the detection of pulmonary nodules, evaluation of a combination of rib-suppressed and original chest radiographs significantly improved the diagnostic performance of radiologists over the use of chest radiographs alone.

Keywords: chest radiography • massive-training artificial neural network • pulmonary nodules • receiver operating characteristic • rib-suppressed image


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.