AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KOZLOWSKI, K.
Right arrow Articles by BUDZINSKA, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KOZLOWSKI, K.
Right arrow Articles by BUDZINSKA, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 97, 21-30, Copyright © 1966 by American Roentgen Ray Society


COMBINED METAPHYSEAL AND EPIPHYSEAL DYSOSTOSIS

REPORT OF TWO CASES-ONE, IN WHICH METAPHYSEAL CHANGES PREDOMINATE, AND A SECOND ONE, IN WHICH EPIPHYSEAL CHANGES ARE MORE MARKED

K. KOZLOWSKI M.D.1 and A. BUDZINSKA M.D.2

1 Pediatric Institute of the Medical School, X-Ray Department, Kopernika 21, Krakow, Poland
2 From the Pediatric Clinic, Medical School, Poznan, Poland; Director, T. Rafinski, M.D., and the Pediatric Clinic, Medical School, Wroclaw, Poland

Two cases of combined metaphyseal and epiphyseal dysostosis are reported.

Case I, a boy, 8 years, 9 months of age had disturbance of growth and ossification in the metaphyses and epiphyses. The metaphyses and the epiphyses were affected in different degrees in different bones, but the metaphyseal changes generally predominated. The vertebral bodies were flattened above the 12th thoracic segment. The metaphyseal dysostosis was most severe at the proximal ends of the humeri, both ends of the tibiae, and distal ends of radii and ulnae. The epiphyseal dysostosis was most severe at the proximal ends of the femora and proximal ends of the humeri.

This case is difficult to classify. Currently, it should be considered an example of dysostosis meta-epiphysealis.

Case II, a female, 12 years of age, is an example of epi-metaphyseal dysostosis. Roentgenograms showed disturbances of ossification and growth in the epiphyses as well as metaphyses. The bones of the hips and shoulders were most affected. Only slight changes were present at the other epiphyses and metaphyses. This case was mistakenly called dysplasia epiphysealis multiplex at the age of 3 years. The followup studies at the age of 12 years showed marked change with advancing age.

The importance of caution in the diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias during the first few years of life is emphasized.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.