AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eschelman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eschelman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Relationship of Clinical and Academic Productivity in a University Hospital Radiology Department

David J. Eschelman1, Kevin L. Sullivan1, Laurence Parker1 and David C. Levin1

1 Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College/Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Ste. 4200, Gibbon Bldg., 111 S. 11th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107.



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. —Bivariate distribution of relative value units (horizontal scale, running from 2000 to 11,000) and academic productivity (vertical scale, 0 to * as defined) are shown on this chart. Each data element is plotted. Four distributions (peer-reviewed articles [{blacktriangleup}, 0-9 on vertical scale], non—peer-reviewed articles [[UNK], 0-5 on vertical scale], presentations [[UNK], 0-50 on vertical scale], and abstracts [{blacksquare}, 0-10 on vertical scale]) are superimposed, each with its own scale, because they are so similar. Higher levels of relative value units are associated with lower academic productivity. Higher variability is seen in academic output among faculty members with low levels of relative value unit generation than in those with high levels.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.