AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takashima, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kadoya, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takashima, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kadoya, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Small Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (<=1 cm) Detected at Population-Based CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Reliable High-Resolution CT Features of Benign Lesions

Shodayu Takashima1, Shusuke Sone2, Feng Li1, Yuichiro Maruyama1, Minoru Hasegawa1, Tsuyoshi Matsushita1, Fumiyoshi Takayama2 and Masumi Kadoya1

1 Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, JA Azumi General Hospital, 3207-1 Ikeda, Nagano 399-8695, Japan.



View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. Method of measurement in clinically benign lesions. Transverse section in which greatest diameter of lesion was included was selected; diameter was used as maximum transverse diameter (A) of lesion. Minimum transverse diameter (B) of lesion was measured as sum of line segments drawn perpendicular to maximum transverse diameter that reached edges of nodule furthest from line segment corresponding to maximum transverse diameter. Two-dimensional ratio was defined as ratio of A to B.

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. Method of measurement in clinically benign lesions. Three to five coronal multiplanar reformations were acquired at 1-mm intervals through each lesion. Longitudinal dimension of lesion was measured as difference between cephalad extent and caudal extent of lesion in each coronal reformation, and greatest value was used as maximum longitudinal dimension (C) of lesion. Three-dimensional ratio was defined as ratio of A to C.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. Correlation between number of benign (white), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (black), and malignant (gray) lesions and three-dimensional ratios of lesion. Bar graphs show correlation between number of benign, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, and malignant lesions and three-dimensional ratios of lesion for reviewers 1 (A) and 2 (B). In general, benign lesions had plural peaks, whereas malignant lesions had only one peak in 1.00–1.24. Three-dimensional ratios in malignant lesions did not exceed 1.78.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. Correlation between number of benign (white), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (black), and malignant (gray) lesions and three-dimensional ratios of lesion. Bar graphs show correlation between number of benign, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, and malignant lesions and three-dimensional ratios of lesion for reviewers 1 (A) and 2 (B). In general, benign lesions had plural peaks, whereas malignant lesions had only one peak in 1.00–1.24. Three-dimensional ratios in malignant lesions did not exceed 1.78.

 


View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Nodular fibrosis with concave margins in 67-year-old man. Both reviewers interpreted lesion as having concave margins (arrow), air bronchograms (arrowheads), and predominantly ground-glass appearance on transverse high-resolution CT images. Lesion size was measured 8 mm by reviewer 1 and 8.5 mm by reviewer 2. Pathologic diagnosis was nodular fibrosis.

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. Localized bronchioloalveolar carcinoma with concave margins in 73-year-old woman. Both reviewers interpreted lesion as having concave margins (arrow), being 9 mm, and being predominantly solid on transverse high-resolution CT images. Pathologic diagnosis was localized bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.

 


View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. Localized bronchioloalveolar carcinoma with concave margins in 73-year-old woman. Coronal reformation shows spherical lesion (arrow). Calculated three-dimensional ratio was 1.38 for reviewer 1 and 1.29 for reviewer 2.

 


View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Nodular fibrosis with polygonal shape in 72-year-old man. Both reviewers interpreted lesion (arrow) as having coarse spiculation, pleural tag, and polygonal shape, and as being predominantly solid on transverse high-resolution CT images. Lesion size was measured as 8 mm by reviewer 1 and 9 mm by reviewer 2. Pathologic diagnosis was nodular fibrosis.

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A. Intrapulmonary lymph node that showed peripheral subpleural lesion in 53-year-old woman. Both reviewers regarded lesion (arrow) as predominantly solid lesion attached to major fissure on transverse high-resolution CT images. Lesion size was measured 9 mm by both reviewers. Pathologic diagnosis was intrapulmonary lymph node.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B. Intrapulmonary lymph node that showed peripheral subpleural lesion in 53-year-old woman. Coronal reformation shows flat lesion (arrow). Calculated three-dimensional ratio was 2.57 for both reviewers.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.