AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hwang, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jang, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hwang, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jang, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2000; 175:235-238
© American Roentgen Ray Society


The Value of CT-Guided Percutaneous Needle Aspiration in Immunocompromised Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Infection

Sung Su Hwang1, Hak Hee Kim2, Seog Hee Park2, Jung Im Jung3 and Hye Suk Jang2

1 Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 93 Chi-dong, Paldal-ku, Suwon, Kyunggi-do, 442-723, Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-ku, Seoul, 137-040, Korea.
3 Department of Radiology, St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, #62, Youido-dong, Yongdungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-019, Korea.

Received September 14, 1999; accepted after revision December 20, 1999.

 
Address correspondence to H. H. Kim.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration in immunocompromised patients with suspected pulmonary infection.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We reviewed the findings and yields of 24 CT-guided percutaneous needle aspirations in 21 immunocompromised patients. Cytologic evaluation and culture for aerobes, anaerobes, Mycobacterium species, and fungus were performed in all aspirates.

RESULTS. We identified one or more etiologic microorganisms in 19 (79.2%) of 24 CT-guided percutaneous needle aspirations. Of 19 aspirates with positive findings, single causal microorganisms were identified in 18. Staphylococcus aureus was found in four aspirates, and Aspergillus fumigatus in seven; these microorganisms were the principal bacterial (4/11) and fungal (7/9) causative organisms. One of the 19 aspirates with positive findings yielded two microorganisms. In the remaining five aspirates, no microorganisms were identified and cytologic examination revealed nonspecific inflammatory cells. No major complications were observed during or after the procedure.

CONCLUSION. CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration is a safe and useful diagnostic method for the identification of specific microorganisms in immunocompromised patients with suspected pulmonary infection.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Immunocompromised hosts are predisposed to various infections. Pulmonary infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for immunocompromised patients. In some clinical situations, the causative microorganism of pulmonary infection can be predicted. However, the use of antibiotics to treat expected microorganisms can be potentially harmful to immunocompromised patients [1,2,3]. Although CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration has become a well-established diagnostic tool for detecting malignant lung lesions, the yield and effectiveness of this technique in the identification of pathogens in immunocompromised patients with pulmonary infection have not been emphasized. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration in immunocompromised patients with suspected pulmonary infection.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
From January 1997 to July 1999, 21 immunocompromised patients (14 men and seven women; age range, 19-85 years) with suspected pulmonary infection underwent 24 CT-guided percutaneous needle aspirations at our institution. Before the procedure, platelet counts and clotting parameters were assessed; platelet counts above 100,000/mm3, bleeding times of less than 8 min, prothrombin times within 3 sec of the control value, and partial thromboplastin times within 6 sec of the control value were considered satisfactory conditions for the procedure. The procedure was performed using 20-gauge Chiba needles (Cook, Bloomington, IN) under CT (Somatom plus 1; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) guidance. The CT-guided technique we used is similar to that used by many radiologists for the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions [4]. After preparing the skin with alcohol and iodine, physicians anesthetized the patients with 2% xylocaine. After placing the Chiba needle at the edge of the pleura, it was inserted into the target area during a single breath-hold. The target lesion was aspirated using a 20-ml syringe during gentle breathing. Aspirated materials were visually inspected and the procedure was repeated in cases of inadequate aspiration. Usually, less than three aspirations were required. Cytologic evaluation and culture for aerobes, anaerobes, Mycobacterium species, and fungus were performed on all aspirates. After the procedure, follow-up chest radiographs were obtained over a 24-hr period to detect possible pulmonary complications, such as pneumothorax.

To evaluate the relationship between the duration of the empiric antibiotic therapy and the yield of the procedure, we assessed the patients' medical records. The presence and duration of empiric antibiotic therapy before the procedure were recorded. All patients were assigned to positive and negative yield groups. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon's rank sum test.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Underlying conditions of immunocompromised patients and identified pathogens are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. On CT scans, pulmonary parenchymal changes of the suspected lung infection included single or multiple foci of parenchymal consolidation with or without cavitation (lobar, segmental, or subsegmental involvement). Identification of one or more specific pathogens was confirmed in 19 (79.2%) of 24 aspirations (Fig. 1). Five aspirates (20.8%) revealed nonspecific inflammatory cells on cytologic examination, and no growth of pathogen was observed on culture. Findings were confirmed at surgery in one patient (Aspergillus species), sputum culture in one (tuberculosis), and lesion resolution in three during follow-up (no specific pathogen was identified) (Fig. 2A,2B,2C). Of 19 aspirates with positive findings, Staphylococcus aureus was identified in four and Aspergillus fumigatus in seven; these microorganisms were identified as predominant pathogens in bacterial (4/11) and fungal (7/9) infections, respectively. One of 19 aspirates with positive findings yielded two microorganisms: S. aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In three patients, we successfully identified six pathogens with CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration. A small asymptomatic ipsilateral pneumothorax developed in one patient. No catheter or tube drainage was required. Three patients had transient chest pain at the site of aspiration. However, no major complications such as symptomatic pneumothorax or hemorrhage occurred in any patient after the procedure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Underlying Conditions of 21 Immunocompromised Patients

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Pathologic Organisms Found in 19 Aspirates

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. —33-year-old man with acute lymphocytic leukemia. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of chest shows well-defined thick-walled cavitary lesion filled with low-density slough in superior segment of left lower lobe. Note adjacent pleural thickening. CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration (not shown) revealed Aspergillus fumigatus.

 


View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. —18-year-old woman with acute myelocytic leukemia. Posteroanterior chest radiograph shows homogeneous lobar consolidation in right upper lobe. Note central venous catheter. Aspirate obtained with CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration (not shown) revealed nonspecific inflammatory cells on cytologic examination and no growth of pathogen in culture.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. —18-year-old woman with acute myelocytic leukemia. Follow-up chest radiograph obtained 10 days after A reveals partial resolution of pneumonic consolidation. Note round low-density cavitary lesion in right upper lobe. Patient underwent empiric therapy.

 


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. —18-year-old woman with acute myelocytic leukemia. Follow-up chest radiograph obtained 18 days after B shows remaining thin-walled cavitary lesion (arrows) in right upper lobe, despite near-complete resolution of pneumonic consolidation.

 

All patients were on empiric antibiotic therapy before the procedure. The duration of antibiotic therapy ranged from 5 to 28 days (mean, 10.3 days) in the positive yield group and from 6 to 38 days (mean, 14.1 days) in the negative yield group. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In recent years, the number of immunocompromised hosts has increased because of increased numbers of organ or bone marrow transplantations and the wide spread of HIV infection. The risk of infection by a wide variety of microorganisms remains high. Pulmonary infections are one of the most frequent complications in immunocompromised patients and remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality [1]. Two articles reported that infectious microorganisms can be predicted on the basis of the nature and severity of the immune defect, past patient exposures, dose and duration of corticosteroid therapy, and type of chemotherapy [2, 3]. However, empiric therapy initiated against commonly suspected organisms may be harmful to immunocompromised patients because of superinfections that may develop resulting from the suppression of normal flora. Additionally, side effects or drug toxicity may occur in various organs. Therefore, the identification of a specific pathogen is important for the targeted and adequate treatment of pulmonary infection in immunocompromised patients.

Several diagnostic methods have been used to obtain specimens for culture or staining when identifying pathogens that cause pulmonary infection. Specimens obtained from the sputum or nasopharyngeal secretions have limited value because of the presence of normal flora and variable results obtained for the detection of anaerobic infection. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage is also a well-established technique. Although this technique may play an important role in the diagnosis of pulmonary infection, it is moderately invasive and requires deep sedation or anesthesia, especially in younger children. The yield of bronchoalveolar lavage is also variable, and the obtained specimen may be contaminated during the passage of the bronchoscope through the upper airways [4,5,6,7]. Open lung biopsy is also an important diagnostic procedure. Two reports have revealed the overall diagnostic yield of open lung biopsy at 81% [8, 9]. However, open lung biopsy has relatively high complication rates of 8-20% in comparison with radiologic interventional procedures, such as percutaneous needle aspiration [10].

In practice, many physicians have difficulties when empiric antibiotic therapy used for a suspected organism is ineffective and the causative pathogen remains unknown, despite the use of several diagnostic techniques. The typical radiographic appearances of pulmonary infections, such as angioinvasive fungal infections, have been documented [11, 12]. However, our cases of pulmonary infection, including fungal infection, revealed nonspecific pulmonary consolidation, areas that should be aspirated to identify causative pathogens. Percutaneous needle aspiration using fluoroscopy, sonography, and CT is an alternative method of obtaining specimens. With the accurate targeting of a pulmonary lesion, specimens and positive results provide reliable clues for the identification of specific organisms.

Several articles reported variable diagnostic yields (11.7-73%) for percutaneous needle aspiration for the identification of specific organisms [13,14,15,16,17,18]. In our series, the diagnostic yield for identifying specific pathogens was 79.2%. In comparison with previous studies, our data show relatively high diagnostic yields. Our findings show that CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration is also useful in the diagnosis of mixed pulmonary infection (we identified one patient with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa infection). When percutaneous needle aspiration reveals positive results, it can eliminate the need for more invasive procedures and provide important information for specific antibiotic treatment.

Although the diagnostic rate of pulmonary malignancy was high (>90%), the reported yields of pulmonary infection including our data are relatively low. Several factors have been suggested to explain the relatively low yield in the diagnosis of benign pulmonary disease, including infection. Diagnosis of benign pulmonary disease requires more tissue than that for malignancy; therefore, it is more difficult to establish correct diagnoses using percutaneous needle aspiration [14]. Two reports revealed low diagnostic yields (44-42%) for the diagnosis of pulmonary infection in hematologic malignancy patients who underwent open lung biopsy [1, 8]. In our study, specific pathogens were identified in only six (66%) of nine aspirates in patients with underlying hematologic malignancy. These findings may be caused by the prior use of empiric antibiotics and the presence of a nonspecific pneumonitis syndrome in our patients with hematologic malignancies [19].

Concerning the correlation of antibiotic therapy duration and aspiration yield, our data revealed no significant difference between the positive and the negative yield groups. However, these findings are affected by factors such as the different antibiotics used and the duration of symptoms before empiric therapy. Therefore, the shorter duration of antibiotic therapy in the positive yield group may suggest that early aspiration improves yield results.

A limitation of our study is the lack of steps for the identification of nonbacterial or nonfungal pulmonary infection, such as virus or Pneumocystis carinii infection. Although the five patients with negative aspirate findings had no suggestive clinical and cytologic findings of virus or P. carinii infection, virus or P. carinii infection cannot be ruled out as possible factors responsible for the relatively low yields of percutaneous needle aspiration.

Reported complications of percutaneous needle aspiration are minor and include pneumothorax and hemoptysis. A large series studying patients undergoing percutaneous needle aspiration reported a 1.1% complication rate [20]. Two articles reported increased complication rates with increased needle size [21, 22]. No complications, such as symptomatic pneumothorax or hemoptysis, occurred in our patients. Although a small ipsilateral pneumothorax developed in one patient (detected on a postaspiration chest radiograph), the patient did not complain of any respiratory symptoms. In three patients with mild chest pain at the site of the aspiration, the pain was transient and resolved spontaneously.

In conclusion, CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration is a safe and useful diagnostic method for the identification of specific organisms in immunocompromised patients with pulmonary infection. If necessary, percutaneous aspiration should be performed as soon as is practically possible because antibiotic therapy before aspiration may decrease the diagnostic yield of the aspiration.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. White DA. Pulmonary infection in the immunocompromised patient. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;7:78 -87[Medline]
  2. Shelhamer JH, Toews GB, Masur H, et al. Respiratory disease in the immunosuppressed patient. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:415 -431
  3. Rivera MP, Jules-Elysee KM, Stover DE. Immunocompromised patients, In: Niederman M, Sarrosi G, Glassroth M, eds. Respiratory infections. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994:163 -198
  4. Moore EH. Technical aspects of needle aspiration lung biopsy: a personal perspective. Radiology 1998;208:303 -318[Free Full Text]
  5. Bartlett JG, Alexander J, Mayhew J, et al. Should fiberoptic bronchoscopy aspirates be cultured? Am Rev Respir Dis 1976;114:73 -78[Medline]
  6. Fossieck BE Jr, Parker RH, Cohen MH, et al. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and culture of bacteria from the lower respiratory tract. Chest 1977;72:5 -9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ratjen F, Costabel U, Havers W. Differential cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in immunocompromised children with pulmonary infiltrates. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:507 -511[Abstract]
  8. Haverkos HW, Downling JN, Pasculle AW, Myelowitz RL, Lerberg DB, Hakala TR. Diagnosis of pneumonitis in immunocompromised patients by open lung biopsy. Cancer 1983;52:1093 -1097[Medline]
  9. McCabe RE, Brooks RG, Mark JB, et al. Open lung biopsy in patients with acute leukemia. Am J Med 1985;78:609 -616[Medline]
  10. Matthay RA, Moritz ED. Invasive procedures for diagnosing pulmonary infection: a critical review. Clin Chest Med 1981;2:3 -18[Medline]
  11. Won HJ, Lee KS, Cheon JE, et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: prediction at thin-section CT in patients with neutropenia—a prospective study. Radiology 1998;208:777 -782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Blum U, Windfuhr M, Buitrago-Tellez C, Sigmund G, Herbst EW, Langer M. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: MRI, CT, plain radiographic findings and their contribution for early diagnosis. Chest 1994;190:247 -254
  13. Castellino RA, Blank N. Etiologic diagnosis of pulmonary infection in immunocompromised patients by fluoroscopically guided percutaneous needle aspiration. Radiology 1979;132:563 -567[Abstract]
  14. Khouri NF, Stitik FP, Erozan YS, et al. Transthoracic aspiration biopsy of benign and malignant lung lesions. AJR 1985;144:281 -288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Green R, Szyfelben WM, Isler RJ, Stark P, Jantsch H. Supplementary tissue-core histology from fine-needle transthoracic aspiration biopsy. AJR 1985;144:787 -792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Johnston WW. Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: a study of 1015 patients. Acta Cytol 1984;28:218 -224[Medline]
  17. Perlmutt LM, Johnston WW, Dunnick NR. Percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration: a review. AJR 1989;152:451 -455[Free Full Text]
  18. John HS, George DF, Joseph GA, et al. Lung lesions: cytologic diagnosis by fine-needle biopsy. Radiology 1987;162:389 -391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. McCabe RE, Remington JS. Open lung biopsy. In: Shelhamer J, Pizzo P, Parrillo JE, Masur H, eds. Respiratory disease in the immunocompromised host. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1991: 105-117
  20. Timothy JW, Patrick FS, Johnson CD, Johnson CM, David HS. CT-guided biopsy: prospective analysis of 1,000 procedures. Radiology 1989;171:493 -496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bernardino ME. Percutaneous biopsy. AJR 1984;142:41 -45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wittenberg J, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of abdominal tumors using 22-gauge needles: further observations. AJR 1982;139:75 -80[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
P. W. Wong, T. Stefanec, K. Brown, and D. A. White
Role of Fine-Needle Aspirates of Focal Lung Lesions in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Chest, February 1, 2002; 121(2): 527 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
T. Franquet
Imaging of pneumonia: trends and algorithms
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2001; 18(1): 196 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hwang, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jang, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hwang, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jang, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS