AJR 2001; 176:137-143
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Pitfalls of Using Three-Dimensional CT Colonography with Two-Dimensional Imaging Correlation
Michael Macari1 and
Alec J. Megibow
1
Both authors: Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging, NYU Medical Center,
Tisch Hospital, 560 First Ave., Ste. HW 206, New York, NY 10016.
Received June 2, 2000;
accepted after revision June 28, 2000.
Address correspondence to M. Macari.
Introduction
CT colonography is an imaging technique that enables both two-dimensional
(2D) and three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the colon
[1,2,3].
Although debate continues regarding which rendering technique should be used
for primary evaluation, the techniques (2D and 3D) are complementary, each
increasing the value of CT for colonic lumen evaluation. Two-dimensional CT
colonography, when used as the primary imaging technique, may be advantageous
in that data may be evaluated in a more time-efficient fashion
[2,
3]. When a potential filling
defect is identified on 2D CT colonography, 3D imaging is used to determine
whether its morphology is linear (interhaustral fold) or polypoid (stool or
polyp) [2,
3].
Three-dimensional CT colonography has the potential to visualize smaller
lesions than 2D CT colonography
[4]. Although some additional
small lesions may be identified, evaluating CT colonography data entirely with
3D imaging is time-consuming. Moreover, often lesions are detected using 3D CT
colonography that show morphology consistent with a polyp or neoplasm. When
these same areas are investigated with 2D CT colonography, a variety of normal
structures may be found to represent these morphologic abnormalities.
Whether one uses 2D or 3D as the primary rendering method, the pitfalls on
3D imaging need to be recognized. Three-dimensional morphologic abnormalities
can be divided into processes that are intrinsic or extrinsic to the colon.
Our purpose is to describe the normal colon with 3D CT colonography and to
show how 2D imaging can be used to establish the cause of an abnormality
depicted with 3D rendering.
Materials and Methods
Patients discussed in this essay underwent bowel preparation with either
polyethylene glycol solution (GoLytely; Braintree Laboratories, Braintree, MA)
or 45 mL of sodium phosphate (24-hr Fleet Prep Kit 1; Fleet, Lynchburg, VA).
Immediately before CT colonography, patients evacuated any residual fluid or
fecal material from the rectum. One milligram of glucagon was administered IV.
A catheter was inserted into the rectum, and the colon was insufflated with
room air (minimum of 40 puffs). A scout CT image was obtained to verify
adequate bowel distention. If adequate bowel distention was present, the CT
examination was performed. If bowel distention was not adequate, additional
air (10 puffs) was insufflated into the rectum. Two acquisitions, the first
with the patient in the supine position and the second, in the prone position,
were performed. All CT examinations were performed with helical HiSpeed
Advantage or CTI units (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) or a
Volume Zoom unit (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). All CT images were transferred
to a remote Advantage workstation (General Electric Medical Systems) equipped
with commercial Navigator software (General Electric Medical Systems) capable
of performing the 2D and 3D data rendering.
Normal Colon
Adequate insufflation with gas (either room air or carbon dioxide gas)
results in a well-distended colon. Data acquisition with the patient in both
supine and prone positions ensures that complementary segments of the colon
are adequately distended [5].
Depending on the degree of distention, the appearance of the normal colonic
lumen will vary with 3D rendering. The mucosa appears featureless if the
interhaustral folds are completely effaced by the pressure of the gas
(Fig. 1). This featureless
appearance is more often detected in the descending colon and rectum, where
the haustra are relatively sparse
[6]. In the cecum and
ascending, transverse, and sigmoid colons thin curvilinear interhaustral folds
will be visualized either randomly oriented or evenly spaced along the colonic
surface (Fig.
2A,2B).
The colon typically has a circular contour to its wall when well distended. In
the transverse colon, the appearance of the endoluminal view may be more
triangular in configuration
[6].

View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 1. 50-year-old man with normal colon. Three-dimensional
thresholdrendered endoluminal CT colonograph of descending colon shows good
distention (arrow) without interhaustral fold delineation.
|
|

View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2A. 60-year-old man with normal colon. Three-dimensional
threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of splenic flexure shows
multiple thin linear filling defects (arrow) haphazardly arranged,
consistent with interhaustral folds.
|
|

View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2B. 60-year-old man with normal colon. Three-dimensional
threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of transverse colon reveals
multiple thin linear filling defects (arrow) arranged in continuous
pattern, consistent with interhaustral folds.
|
|
If the colon is not properly distended, 3D endoluminal visualization will
be limited, and adequate rendering may not be possible (Fig.
3A,3B).
When the colon is evaluated with the 3D endoluminal technique, a
circumferential constricting neoplasm may be difficult to distinguish from a
collapsed segment. In addition, polyps are more difficult to perceive in
collapsed segments. In general, adequate distention is recognized by obtaining
a scout topogram after colonic insufflation with gas. If distention appears
adequate, the CT colonography data set is obtained. Once the data set is
obtained, the degree of distention is more easily appreciated on 2D than on 3D
images.

View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3A. 64-year-old man with incompletely distended colon.
Three-dimensional threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of sigmoid
colon shows poor distention limiting endoluminal perspectives. An 8-mm polyp
(arrow) is difficult to perceive because of incomplete distention
(same arrow).
|
|

View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 3B. 64-year-old man with incompletely distended colon.
Two-dimensional axial CT scan of same region again reveals poor distention.
Polyp (arrow) is easier to appreciate on 2D imaging in this case.
|
|
Intrinsic Abnormalities
Residual Fecal Material
The major pitfall of 3D endoluminal evaluation is mistaking residual fecal
material for polyp or neoplasm (Figs.
4A,4B
and
5A,5B,5C).
The colon needs to be rigorously cleansed before CT colonography
[7]. Even in compliant
patients, small amounts of residual fecal material may persist. The following
observations aid in distinguishing fecal residue from true polyp. Most fecal
debris will remain on the dependent surface of the bowel when the patient is
moved from the supine to the prone position. Often, gas will be identified in
the fecal material, confirming stool (Figs.
4A,4B
and
5A,5B,5C).
Small amounts of gas are easily detected using 2D techniques and adjustment of
window and level settings. Both 3D rendering techniques (surface- and
volume-rendering) currently in use for endoluminal display are not sensitive
to the presence of air; however, the air is readily apparent on the 2D images,
reinforcing the need to constantly correlate 2D and 3D information. Finally,
residual barium in the fecal material may help differentiate stool from
neoplasm (Fig.
6A,6B).
There is currently interest in developing orally ingested bowel preparations
that would "label" residual fecal material with barium,
potentially aiding in the differentiation of stool and polyp
[7].

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4A. 51-year-old man with residual fecal material.
Three-dimensional threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of cecum shows
large filling defect (arrows). Differential diagnosis includes polyp,
neoplasm, stool, and extrinsic compression.
|
|

View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 4B. 51-year-old man with residual fecal material. Coronal
reformatted CT scan at same level as A reveals filling defect that
contains bubbles of gas (arrow), consistent with residual fecal
material.
|
|

View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5A. 75-year-old woman with known rectal neoplasm who has two
filling defects seen on CT colonography. IV contrast material was administered
in this case for staging purposes. Three-dimensional threshold-rendered
endoluminal CT colonograph of rectum shows two indistinguishable filling
defects (arrows). Differential diagnosis for each lesion includes
neoplasm and stool.
|
|

View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5B. 75-year-old woman with known rectal neoplasm who has two
filling defects seen on CT colonography. IV contrast material was administered
in this case for staging purposes. Axial CT scan of rectum at level of upper
vagina reveals homogeneously enhancing mass (arrow) consistent with
neoplasm. Mass corresponds with small arrow in A.
|
|

View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 5C. 75-year-old woman with known rectal neoplasm who has two
filling defects seen on CT colonography. IV contrast material was administered
in this case for staging purposes. Axial CT scan 1 cm cephalad to B
reveals residual fecal material (arrow). Note small bubbles of gas in
filling defect, confirming stool. This finding corresponds with large arrow in
A.
|
|

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 6B. 70-year-old woman with impacted diverticulum. Coronal
reformatted CT scan at same level as filling defect in A reveals
impacted diverticulum (arrow) filled with high-density stool and
residual barium from previous examination.
|
|
Diverticula
Diverticula may simulate polyps on 3D endoluminal displays (Fig.
7A,7B).
A diverticulum will be noted to have a dense ring around it identifying the
orifice [8]. In contrast, a
polyp does not have a complete ring shadow surrounding it because it is a
raised structure (Fig.
8A,8B).
When a diverticulum is impacted with fecal material, it may appear as a raised
lesion and mimic a polyp (Fig.
6A,6B).
In these cases, 2D imaging is necessary to show both the higher density in the
impacted diverticulum and a portion of the diverticulum extending outside the
colonic wall.

View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 7A. 66-year-old man with diverticulum. Three-dimensional
threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of transverse colon shows 1-cm
defect surrounded by complete ring shadow (arrow), suggesting
diverticulum.
|
|

View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 8A. 56-year-old woman with small polyp. Three-dimensional
threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of cecum shows 5-mm filling
defect with incomplete ring (arrow). Differential diagnosis includes
polyp, residual fecal material, and atypical diverticulum.
|
|
Ileocecal Valve
A prominent ileocecal valve is a common pitfall at 3D CT colonography.
Three appearances of the normal ileocecal valve have been characterized by
colonoscopists: a papillary type (Fig.
9A,9B),
with a domelike protrusion having its mouth at the apex; a labial type (Fig.
10A,10B),
appearing as a slightly raised fold with the mouth separating the fold
margins; and an intermediate type
[6]. Occasionally the opening
of the valve may be visualized during 3D evaluation (Fig.
10A,10B).
Differentiating the valve from neoplasm is usually not difficult because the
valve is in a characteristic location. However, the morphologic appearance of
the ileocecal valve on 3D CT colonography may be similar to that of a polyp or
neoplasm (Fig.
9A,9B).
Two-dimensional imaging allows the terminal ileum to be evaluated, and it can
then be followed directly to the valve (Figs.
9A,9B
and
10A,10B).

View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 9A. 70-year-old man with papillary type ileocecal valve.
Three-dimensional threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of ascending
colon shows 1.5-cm raised filling defect (arrow). Note depression in
center (arrowhead) of defect. Differential diagnosis includes
ulcerated neoplasm and ileocecal valve.
|
|

View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 9B. 70-year-old man with papillary type ileocecal valve. Coronal
reformatted CT scan at same level as A reveals filling defect is
actually prominent ileocecal valve (arrow). Note cephalad and caudal
leaflets of valve and terminal ileum.
|
|

View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 10A. 76-year-old man with labial type ileocecal valve.
Three-dimensional threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of ascending
colon shows small opening in expected region of ileocecal valve
(arrow). Differential diagnosis includes incompetent valve or
diverticulum.
|
|
Extrinsic Defects
Any organ or structure that is outside the colon can cause external
compression. Because extrinsic structures usually compress the colon along a
focal area of the distended colon, they do not appear as occlusive lesions.
Rather, when evaluated from an endoluminal 3D perspective, these external
structures compressing the wall may appear to be focal neoplasms. We have
noted external compression from the liver (Fig.
11A,11B),
other loops of bowel (Fig.
12A,12B),
the psoas muscle (Fig.
13A,13B),
and the aorta (Fig.
14A,14B).
Similar external compression effects may be detected related to the spleen and
kidneys. These external compressions may be more common in thin patients and
stress the need for 2D imaging correlation whenever an abnormality on 3D
imaging is detected.

View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11A. 50-year-old man with external compression from
posteroinferior segment (segment VI) of liver. Three-dimensional
threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of ascending colon viewing
toward hepatic flexure shows large filling defect (arrows).
Differential diagnosis includes neoplasm, stool, and extrinsic
compression.
|
|

View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 11B. 50-year-old man with external compression from
posteroinferior segment (segment VI) of liver. Coronal reformatted CT scan at
same level as A reveals impression on hepatic flexure (arrow)
by inferior surface of liver segment VI (6).
|
|

View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 12A. 52-year-old woman with external compression from adjacent
loop of distended bowel. Three-dimensional threshold-rendered endoluminal CT
colonograph of ascending colon shows large filling defect (arrow).
Differential diagnosis includes neoplasm, stool, and extrinsic
compression.
|
|

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 13A. 82-year-old man with external compression from psoas muscle.
Three-dimensional threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of ascending
colon shows long filling defect (arrows). Appearance is atypical for
polyp or neoplasm.
|
|

View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 14A. 74-year-old man with external compression from aorta.
Three-dimensional threshold-rendered endoluminal CT colonograph of sigmoid
colon shows filling defect (arrow). Differential diagnosis includes
neoplasm, stool, and extrinsic compression.
|
|
Conclusion
A combination of 2D and 3D rendering techniques optimizes evaluation of the
lumen of the colon for polyps and neoplasms
[1,
2,
3,
7]. The techniques are
complementary, and both need to be available to the radiologists when
evaluating CT colonography data sets. We have described the normal 3D
endoluminal view of the colon and some of the more common pitfalls that may be
encountered with 3D rendering. We have not described every pitfall that may be
encountered during CT colonography. Other pitfalls using both 2D and 3D CT
colonography have been previously described
[9].
When an abnormality is detected on 3D CT colonography, the area should be
closely investigated with a combination of axial and multiplanar reformatted
images. Such investigation will often help to establish the cause of the 3D
abnormality.
References
-
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ehman JE, Ilstrup DM. Colorectal
polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques.
Radiology
1996;200:49
-54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. CT colonography with
three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps.
AJR
1998;171:989
-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ. Comparison of
time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic
evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR
2000;174:1543
-1549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK. An initial experience with screening
for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual
colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc
1999;50:309
-313[Medline]
-
Chen SC, Lu DSK, Hecht JR, Kedall BM. CT colonography: value of
scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR
1999;172:595
-599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blackstone MO. The colon: endoscopic orientation, technique of
examination, and normal appearance. In: Blackstone MO, ed.
Endoscopic interpretation: normal and pathologic appearances of the
gastrointestinal tract. New York: Raven,
1984: 401-427
-
Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT. First international symposium on virtual
colonoscopy. AJR
1999;173:565
-569[Free Full Text]
-
Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. Virtual colonoscopy: imaging
features with colonoscopic correlation. AJR
1998;170:1303
-1309[Free Full Text]
-
Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, MacCarty TJ, Reed JE, Hara AK. CT
colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques.
AJR
1999;172:1271
-1278[Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Mang, A. Maier, C. Plank, C. Mueller-Mang, C. Herold, and W. Schima
Pitfalls in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography: A Systematic Approach
RadioGraphics,
March 1, 2007;
27(2):
431 - 454.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. O'Connor, R. M. Summers, J. Yao, P. J. Pickhardt, and J. R. Choi
CT Colonography with Computer-aided Polyp Detection: Volume and Attenuation Thresholds to Reduce False-Positive Findings Owing to the Ileocecal Valve
Radiology,
November 1, 2006;
241(2):
426 - 432.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Silva, C. V. Wellnitz, and A. K. Hara
Three-dimensional Virtual Dissection at CT Colonography: Unraveling the Colon to Search for Lesions
RadioGraphics,
November 1, 2006;
26(6):
1669 - 1686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Silva, A. K. Hara, J. A. Leighton, and J. P. Heppell
CT Colonography with Intravenous Contrast Material: Varied Appearances of Colorectal Carcinoma
RadioGraphics,
September 1, 2005;
25(5):
1321 - 1334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Pickhardt and J. R. Choi
Adenomatous Polyp Obscured by Small-Caliber Rectal Catheter at Low-Dose CT Colonography: A Rare Diagnostic Pitfall
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
May 1, 2005;
184(5):
1581 - 1583.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Dachman, P. Schumm, B. Heckel, H. Yoshida, and P. LaRiviere
The Effect of Reconstruction Algorithm on Conspicuity of Polyps in CT Colonography
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
November 1, 2004;
183(5):
1349 - 1353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Pickhardt
Differential Diagnosis of Polypoid Lesions Seen at CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)
RadioGraphics,
November 1, 2004;
24(6):
1535 - 1556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Laks, M. Macari, and E. J. Bini
Positional Change in Colon Polyps at CT Colonography
Radiology,
June 1, 2004;
231(3):
761 - 766.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Hoppe, C. Quattropani, A. Spreng, J. Mattich, P. Netzer, and H.-P. Dinkel
Virtual Colon Dissection with CT Colonography Compared with Axial Interpretation and Conventional Colonoscopy: Preliminary Results
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
May 1, 2004;
182(5):
1151 - 1158.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Gluecker, J. G. Fletcher, T. J. Welch, R. L. MacCarty, W. S. Harmsen, J. R. Harrington, D. Ilstrup, L. A. Wilson, K. E. Corcoran, and C. D. Johnson
Characterization of Lesions Missed on Interpretation of CT Colonography Using a 2D Search Method
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
April 1, 2004;
182(4):
881 - 889.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Pickhardt
Three-Dimensional Endoluminal CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): Comparison of Three Commercially Available Systems
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
December 1, 2003;
181(6):
1599 - 1606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Pickhardt and J.-H. R. Choi
Electronic Cleansing and Stool Tagging in CT Colonography: Advantages and Pitfalls with Primary Three-Dimensional Evaluation
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
September 1, 2003;
181(3):
799 - 805.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Macari, E. J. Bini, S. L. Jacobs, N. Lange, and Y. W. Lui
Filling Defects at CT Colonography: Pseudo- and Diminutive Lesions (The Good), Polyps (The Bad), Flat Lesions, Masses, and Carcinomas (The Ugly)
RadioGraphics,
September 1, 2003;
23(5):
1073 - 1091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Lefere, S. S. Gryspeerdt, J. Dewyspelaere, M. Baekelandt, and B. G. Van Holsbeeck
Dietary Fecal Tagging as a Cleansing Method before CT Colonography: Initial Results—Polyp Detection and Patient Acceptance
Radiology,
August 1, 2002;
224(2):
393 - 403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yoshida, J. Nappi, P. MacEneaney, D. T. Rubin, and A. H. Dachman
Computer-aided Diagnosis Scheme for Detection of Polyps at CT Colonography
RadioGraphics,
July 1, 2002;
22(4):
963 - 979.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Fletcher, C. D. Johnson, W. R. Krueger, D. A. Ahlquist, H. Nelson, D. Ilstrup, W. S. Harmsen, and K. E. Corcoran
Contrast-Enhanced CT Colonography in Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma: Feasibility of Simultaneous Evaluation for Metastatic Disease, Local Recurrence, and Metachronous Neoplasia in Colorectal Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
February 1, 2002;
178(2):
283 - 290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Ferrucci
Colon Cancer Screening with Virtual Colonoscopy: Promise, Polyps, Politics
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
November 1, 2001;
177(5):
975 - 988.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|