AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marangio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fìlice, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marangio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fìlice, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:1481-1482
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Splenic Metastasis

Anna Marangio1, Ubaldo Prati2, Ombretta Luinetti3, Enrico Brunetti1 and Carlo Fìlice1

1 Divisione di Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Università di Pavia, via Taramelli 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
2 Divisione di Chirurgia Epatopancreatica, IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Università di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
3 Istituto di Anatomia Patologica, IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Università di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Received August 2, 2001; accepted after revision November 20, 2001.

 
Address correspondence to C. Fìlice.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Subject and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The radiofrequency ablation treatment of secondary tumors, particularly in the liver, is gaining most of the attention in the field because it may obviate major surgery [1]. It is now established that surgical resection of the liver in patients with colorectal cancer may be curative, with survival rates of 25-40% at 5-year follow-up and an overall median survival of 33 months [2]. The need for an alternative treatment stems mainly from the facts that only 20% of colorectal cancer patients are suitable for metastasectomy and that the surgery is associated with considerable perioperative morbidity as well as a mortality rate of 2-10% [2]. Moreover, tumor in the liver recurs in 53-68% of patients, and a repeated resection can be performed in only a minority of such patients. Studies [1,2,3,4] have found that radiofrequency tumor ablation, when compared with surgical resection, entails less invasiveness, markedly reduced treatment costs, and lower morbidity and mortality rates. In addition, radiofrequency tumor ablation allows treatment of nonsurgical candidates and the option of repeating the minimally invasive treatment in the event of local recurrence or new metastases. However, none of these studies involved the spleen (most likely because of the reluctance to insert a large-bore needle into a highly vascularized organ).

We here report our experience in performing radiofrequency ablation of tumors in the spleen. Our aim was to verify the feasibility of coagulative necrosis in a colorectal splenic metastasis, this being a very vascularized lesion in a highly vascularized tissue.


Subject and Methods
Top
Introduction
Subject and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In 1999, a right-sided hemicolectomy was performed in a 60-year-old woman because of colorectal adenocarcinoma. One year later, the patient was readmitted to our hospital. A CT scan showed a 5-cm mass infiltrating the left side of the colon, a 2-cm focal lesion in liver segment IV that was contiguous to the middle hepatic vein, and two nodular subcapsular lesions in the spleen that measured 1 and 3 cm (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 60-year-old woman with hepatic and splenic metastases from colonic adenocarcinoma. CT scan shows focal lesion (open arrow) in liver segment IV contiguous to middle hepatic vein and one thermoablated splenic lesion (solid arrow).

 

Informed consent both for surgical intervention and intraoperative radiofrequency ablation was obtained from the patient. At surgery, the mass in the colon was found to be an omental metastasis. Omentectomy and ablation of the mass were performed together with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation of the hepatic lesion and, before splenectomy, of one of two splenic lesions.

Intraoperative tumor ablations were done under sonographic guidance using a linear 7.5-MHz probe (Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). A 15-gauge, 15-cm needle electrode (LeVeen; Radio Therapeutics, Sunnyvale, CA) was inserted into the center of the larger splenic lesion and connected to a generator (RF 2000; Radio Therapeutics) that supplies as much as 100 W of power. Once deployed, the 10-hook electrode array was expanded to a 3.5-cm diameter. Radiofrequency energy was applied with an initial power setting of 50 W, which is the standard protocol for hepatic lesions [5].

To reduce the loss of heat from vascular inflow and to treat the tissue evenly, the splenic vessels were clamped using the procedure that had previously been described for the liver [6]. For performance of radiofrequency ablation in the spleen, we changed the timing and setting of radiofrequency power used in the liver protocol, increasing the setting by 10 W at 1-min intervals and lengthening the time before "roll-off" to approximately one third of that used for hepatic lesions. We then began a second ablation treatment of the tumor with the setting at 90 W. After 12 min, the impedance of the treated area increased to more than 200 ohms with a precipitous decline in power (<10 W), and treatment was terminated. The splenectomy was performed.


Results
Top
Introduction
Subject and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Pathologic comparison between the non-treated and the treated splenic metastases showed that a central core of necrosis was present in the latter and almost absent in the former. The diameter of the necrotic zone was about 1 cm. Both lesions showed a peripheral zone of vital tumor, in which the cells had a picket-fence appearance and the necrosis was without inflammatory cells (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 60-year-old woman with hepatic and splenic metastases from colonic adenocarcinoma. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen of splenic metastasis of moderately differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma obtained after radiofrequency ablation shows central core (single arrow) and peripheral zone of necrosis (double arrows). In neoplasm, cells have picket-fence appearance; necrosis is without inflammatory cells. Paraffin sections were stained with H and E (x10).

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Subject and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Many reasons could explain the poor result: Splenic metastatic disease lacks several of the pathologic features that actually facilitate radiofrequency ablation treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. The latter arises in a cirrhotic liver and benefits from the so-called oven effect, in which the fibrous capsule and the surrounding densely fibrotic and poorly vascularized liver act as retardants to thermal conduction away from the target lesion and thus maintain optimal heat diffusion in the softer, usually well-circumscribed tumor nodule [7]. Generally, metastases are not encapsulated and tend to infiltrate into the surrounding, well-vascularized tissue that can function as a heat sink to limit tissue heating [1, 2]. Another explanation might be found in our using only H and E staining in the evaluation of the treated tumor: H and E—stained sections may not accurately reflect thermal necrosis. The presence of the small foci of necrosis also found in the untreated lesion raises the question of whether the necrotic effect was due to the clamping maneuver rather than to the radiofrequency ablation treatment.

Although we were not able to obtain complete necrosis, we are encouraged by our initial experience with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation as a treatment for malignant splenic lesions because it was safe and without complications. Considering the lack of experience in using radiofrequency ablation in this organ [5], we regarded the procedure in our patient as an experiment. Because hepatic metastases can be successfully treated using this method, we may find that a longer time and more radiofrequency energy might be needed for splenic lesions; how much longer a time and how much more energy are still open questions. Future attempts will probably address these issues. On the other hand, recent advances in radiofrequency technology provide increased energy application and larger coagulation volumes, thus allowing optimal treatment of medium to large metastases of different origins and in different organs and expanding the indications for use of radiofrequency ablation. In our opinion, the amount of energy required to treat a colorectal metastasis in the spleen is much greater than that required to treat the same lesion in the liver or a hepatocellular carcinoma of the same size.

For this reason, we think that this procedure should be performed only intraoperatively. Percutaneous puncture of the spleen is feasible [8], but use of a needle electrode for radiofrequency ablation in the spleen is problematic because it requires the puncture of a highly vascularized tissue with a large-bore needle for a long period (20 min at the shortest), with no way to reduce the blood flow or monitor possible bleeding. Moreover, the high vascularization of the spleen produces extremely high intraabdominal temperature, with the risk of thermal lesions of the adjacent viscera. This problem is also likely to be encountered using the laparoscopic approach, which has become the first choice for intraoperative thermal ablation of liver tumors. Finally, clamping of splenic hilus, corresponding to the Pringle maneuver for the liver, is not always a safe procedure for anatomic reasons.

In conclusion, radiofrequency ablation could become an effective technique for treating splenic metastases without splenectomy. The true role of this method still remains to be determined, and more studies are needed so that the results of different options may be compared.


References
Top
Introduction
Subject and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. de Baere T, Elias D, Dromain C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 100 hepatic metastases with a mean follow-up of more than 1 year. AJR 2000;175:1619 -1625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Solbiati L, Ierace T, Tonolini M, Osti V, Cova L. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic metastases. Eur J Ultrasound 2001;13:149 -158[Medline]
  3. McGahan J, Dodd G. Radiofrequency ablation of the liver: current status. AJR 2001;176:3 -16[Free Full Text]
  4. Curley S, Izzo F, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies: results in 123 patients. Ann Surg 1999;230:1 -8[Medline]
  5. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR. Thermal ablation therapy for focal malignancy: a unified approach to underlying principles, techniques, and diagnostic imaging guidance. AJR 2000;174:323 -331[Free Full Text]
  6. Rossi S, Garbagnati F, Lencioni R, et al. Percutaneous radio-frequency thermal ablation of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after occlusion of tumor blood supply. Radiology 2000;217:119 -126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Livraghi T, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Ultrasound 2001;13:159 -166[Medline]
  8. Civardi G, Vallisa D, Berte, et al. Ultrasoundguided fine needle biopsy of the spleen: high clinical efficacy and low risk in a multicenter Italian study. Am J Hematol 2001;67:93 -99[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S.-Y. Chiou, J.-B. Liu, and L. Needleman
Current Status of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2007; 26(4): 487 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marangio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fìlice, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marangio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Fìlice, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS