AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 180:716-718
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

Embolization of the Patent Ductus Venosus in an Adult Patient

Takuji Araki1, Toshiyuki Konishi2, Shinichiro Yasuda2, Takanori Osada2 and Tsutomu Araki1

1 Department of Radiology, Yamanashi Medical University, 1110 Shimokato, Tamaho, Nakakoma-gun, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Kofu Kyoritsu Hospital, 1-9-1 Takara, Kofu-city, Yamanashi, 400-0034, Japan.

Received February 11, 2002; accepted after revision August 27, 2002.

 
Address correspondence to Tsutomu Araki.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
In fetal circulation the ductus venosus is a connection between the left portal vein and the inferior vena cava that closes immediately after birth. Reports of patent ductus venosus in children are rare [1, 2, 3, 4], and in adults, even rarer [5, 6]. Although a patent ductus venosus may be thought of as a kind of portosystemic shunt, most intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunts, which often result in portosystemic encephalopathy, are congenital shunts between the intrahepatic portal vein and the peripheral hepatic vein [7, 8]. A patent ductus venosus may be treated by conservative therapy or by surgical banding [9]. To our knowledge, only three reports about the transcatheter treatment of patients with this disease have been published [3, 4, 6].

We present a case of a 45-year-old woman with direct communication between the left portal vein and the inferior vena cava that was a patent ductus venosus. An arterial portogram revealed a markedly dilated left portal vein and a narrowed right portal vein. While the shunt was temporarily occluded by an inflated balloon, the shunt was successfully treated by embolization with the use of detachable coils via a retrograde transcaval route.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
In August 1997, a 45-year-old woman with a 2-year history of disturbance of consciousness and headache presented to our hospital. She had been diagnosed at another hospital as having hepatic encephalopathy due to hyperammonemia of unknown origin and was conservatively treated with no improvement in her condition. The results of routine laboratory tests were as follows: serum albumin, 3.0 g/dL (normal, 3.4-4.9 g/dL); and total bilirubin, 1.7 mg/dL (0.2-1.1 mg/dL). Blood ammonia was elevated at 193 µg/dL (12-66 µg/dL). Laboratory results indicated that hepatitis C virus antibody and hepatitis B surface antigen were not present. There was no clinical evidence of liver cirrhosis.

Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT revealed an abnormal vein between the left portal branch and the inferior vena cava passing through the fissure for the ligamentum venosum (Figs. 1A and 1B). An arterial portogram revealed the abnormal vein connecting the umbilical portion of the portal vein directly to the inferior vena cava. Although the main portal trunk and its left branch were dilated, the right branch was narrowed (Fig. 1C). A celiac arteriogram revealed compensatory dilatation of the hepatic artery. There was no communication between the abnormal vein and any hepatic veins, and the diagnosis was a patent ductus venosus. The patient opted for a transcatheter procedure, not surgery, for treatment of the patent ductus venosus.



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 45-year-old woman with patent ductus venosus. Contiguous contrast-enhanced CT scans with 10-mm slice thickness reveal abnormal vein (arrow, A) connecting large left portal vein to inferior vena cava through fissure for ligamentum venosum.

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 45-year-old woman with patent ductus venosus. Contiguous contrast-enhanced CT scans with 10-mm slice thickness reveal abnormal vein (arrow, A) connecting large left portal vein to inferior vena cava through fissure for ligamentum venosum.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 45-year-old woman with patent ductus venosus. Portogram obtained through superior mesenteric artery reveals abnormal vein (arrow) following dilated left portal vein and narrow right portal vein. Shunt near umbilical portion of left portal vein appears to be aneurysmal.

 

From the right internal jugular vein, a 6-French catheter with a 20-mm-diameter latex balloon was inserted into the abnormal vein. When the abnormal shunt was temporarily occluded by the inflated balloon, the patient's portal venous pressure increased from 18 to 20 mm Hg. An arterial portogram obtained during temporary balloon occlusion showed good portal venous flow and right portal branches that were slightly wider than those without balloon occlusion. Therefore, we assumed that occlusion of the abnormal vein did not affect the portal venous circulation. The diameter of the abnormal vein was 10 mm, and the aneurysmal dilatation was 16 mm near the umbilical portion of portal vein.

A microcatheter (Renegade; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was introduced through a balloon catheter into the aneurysmal portion of the abnormal vein. A temporary occlusion balloon was inflated in the 10-mm-diameter shunt. We prepared snares and cardiac muscle biopsy forceps to treat migration of coils should that become necessary. Embolization was performed with detachable coils (IDC [interlocking detachable coil]; Target, Fremont, CA) and microcoils (Tornado; Cook, Bloomington, IN) under temporary balloon occlusion of the shunt to control the blood flow (Fig. 1D). We placed nine interlocking detachable coils, ranging in diameter from 8 to 14 mm and in length from 10 to 20 cm, and 12 microcoils that were 6 mm in diameter and 6 cm long.



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 45-year-old woman with patent ductus venosus. Radiographic fluorogram shows transcatheter embolization using detachable microcoils and temporary balloon occlusion. Note inflated balloon (arrows).

 

Before the occlusion balloon was completely deflated, the shunt venous pressure measured through the balloon catheter was decreased by approximately 0-3 mm Hg, and no coil migration or movement was seen during slight deflation of the balloon. The temporary occlusion balloon had been inflated for 3 hr by the time the embolization was completed. An arterial portogram obtained after embolization showed that the shunt was completely occluded, and the right portal branches were wider than before embolization. Ten days after embolization, the blood ammonia level had dropped from 193 to 55 µg/dL, which is in the normal range. Three months after the intervention, an arterial portogram revealed a normal portal vein and occlusion of the abnormal vein (Fig. 1E). Four years after embolization was performed, the patient's symptoms had not recurred.



View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. 45-year-old woman with patent ductus venosus. Arterial portogram obtained 3 months after treatment reveals shunt to be completely occluded and portal vein branches to be normally wide.

 


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
The ductus venosus is a fetal circulation system that provides a direct connection between the portal vein and inferior vena cava or left hepatic vein. A patent ductus venosus should differ from intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunts without liver cirrhosis, which may be congenital in origin [7]. In the embryo, when remnants of anastomosis between the subcardinal venous and vitelline venous systems are present, intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunts occur, usually between intrahepatic portal veins and peripheral hepatic veins.

In our patient, the abnormal vein connected the umbilical portion of the portal vein and the inferior vena cava directly through the fissure for the ligamentum venosum. The portal vein at the umbilical portion connects with the umbilical vein and ductus venosus in fetal circulation. According to Mitchell et al. [1], the ductus venosus is rapidly obliterated after birth and forms the ligament venosum. Unlike the umbilical vein, the ductus venosus rarely reopens in patients with portal hypertension because the ductal-portal junction closes early, whereas the umbilical-portal junction is frequently patent after birth. Our patient had a portal venous pressure of 18 mm Hg, but portal hypertension did not seem to have caused the ductus venosus to reopen because other collateral veins or splenomegaly was absent and because the abnormal vein was a patent ductus venosus, not a reopened one.

A patent ductus venosus is important to recognize because it causes portosystemic encephalopathy during childhood. However, only nine cases in adults have been reported [5, 6]. Why portosystemic encephalopathy often develops later in life—even when the shunt itself is congenital—is not known [2]. A patent ductus venosus with mild symptoms of portosystemic encephalopathy or heart failure may be conservatively treated. When these symptoms are not conservatively controlled, the shunt must be closed by surgical banding or transcatheter procedures. Only three reports about transcatheter procedures for treatment of patients with this disease, including one adult, appear in the literature [3, 4, 6]. Two of these reports describe embolizations, and the other describes placement of a reduction stent to decrease shunt volume.

Embolization can be expected to have the same effect as surgical banding, but embolization is less invasive. Liver congestion leading to portal thrombosis has been reported to occur in patients treated with surgical banding [1, 9], and embolization may have the same risk. To evaluate the risk, we measured the portal venous pressure and performed arterial portography under temporary balloon occlusion of the shunt before embolization. The patient's portal venous pressure was minimally elevated, and arterial portography revealed good blood flow and wide right portal branches. These findings might suggest that portal venous congestion would not occur after embolization. Liver biopsy was not performed in our patient, but confirmation of the absence of liver cirrhosis by biopsy might provide a more accurate prognosis. On the other hand, placement of a reduction stent can gradually occlude the shunt. Liver congestion may occur to a lesser extent with stent placement than with embolization. Nevertheless, shunt flow still poses the risk of pulmonary thrombosis, and one cannot predict when the shunt will be completely occluded.

We performed embolization through the retrograde transcaval route. During embolization, temporary balloon occlusion of the patent ductus venosus prevented migration of the coils as a result of the high shunt flow. In another study, temporary balloon occlusion reduced the likelihood of coil migration and predicted portal hemodynamic changes after occlusion [6]. We believe transcatheter intervention through retrograde transcaval access to be the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic patent ductus venosus.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Mitchell IM, Pollock JCG, Gibson AAM. Patent ductus venosus. Pediatr Cardiol 1991;12:181 -183[Medline]
  2. Uchino T, Endou F, Ikeda S, Shiraki K, Sera Y, Matsuda I. Three brothers with progressive hepatic dysfunction and severe hepatic steatosis due to a patent ductus venosus. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1964 -1968[Medline]
  3. Schwartz YM, Berkowitz D, Lorbert A. Transvenous coil embolization of a patent ductus venosus in a 2-month-old child. Pediatrics 1999;103:1045 -1047[Free Full Text]
  4. Marx M, Huber WD, Crone J, et al. Interventional stent implantation in a child with patent ductus venosus and pulmonary hypertension. Eur J Pediatr 2001;160:501 -504[Medline]
  5. Barjon P, Lamarque JL, Michel H, Fourcade J, Mimran A. Persistent ductus venosus without portal hypertension in a young alcoholic man. Gut 1972;13:982 -985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Shen B, Younossi ZM, Dolmatch B, et al. Patent ductus venosus in an adult presenting as pulmonary hypertension, right-sided heart failure, and portosystemic encephalopathy. Am J Med 2001;110:657 -660[Medline]
  7. Mori H, Hayashi K, Fukuda T, et al. Intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt: occurrence in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. AJR 1987;149:711 -714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Maeda T, Mori H, Aikawa H, Komatsu E, Kagawa K. Therapeutic embolization of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts by retrograde transcaval catheterization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1993;16:245 -247[Medline]
  9. Kamata S, Kitayama Y, Usui N, et al. Patent ductus venosus with a hypoplastic intrahepatic portal system presenting intrapulmonary shunt: a case treated with banding of the ductus venosus. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:655 -657[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. M. Merkle and R. C. Gilkeson
Remnants of Fetal Circulation: Appearance on MDCT in Adults
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 541 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS