AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:1011-1015
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Change in the Hemodynamics of the Portal Venous System After Retrograde Transvenous Balloon Occlusion of a Gastrorenal Shunt

Takuji Yamagami1, Takeharu Kato, Shigeharu Iida, Osamu Tanaka and Tsunehiko Nishimura

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-chyo, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.

Received January 10, 2003; accepted after revision April 30, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to T. Yamagami (yamagami{at}koto.kpu-m.ac.jp).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our investigation was to examine changes in the hemodynamics of the liver after artificial occlusion of a gastrorenal shunt.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nine patients with portal hypertension underwent splenic arteriography and CT arterial portography during infusion of contrast material via the splenic artery. Images were obtained with the balloon catheter both inflated and deflated in the gastrorenal shunt, and results were compared.

RESULTS. During the portal phase of splenic arteriography, the intrahepatic portal vein was more clearly seen when the balloon occluded the gastrorenal shunt. Mean CT attenuation values of branches of the intrahepatic portal vein on CT arterial portograms acquired when the balloon catheter was inflated were higher than values acquired when the balloon was deflated; however, results for the inferior vena cava were the opposite. Differences in CT attenuation values were statistically significant for the right branch of the portal vein, main portal vein, right lobe of the liver parenchyma, and inferior vena cava.

CONCLUSION. Closure of large gastrorenal shunts (hepatofugal portasystemic shunts) causes the portal blood flow to switch from hepatofugal to hepatopetal, which increases the effective intrahepatic portal blood flow.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Gastric varices are a common complication of portal hypertension [13], although less common than esophageal varices [1]. However, once gastric varices bleed, the mortality rate in untreated patients is high, ranging from 45% to 55% [1, 4, 5]. Thus, quick treatment of bleeding gastric varices is essential. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is known to be an effective therapy for gastric varices in patients with a dilated gastrorenal shunt [68]. The therapeutic value of BRTO in patients with portasystemic encephalopathy resulting from portal hypertension also has been reported [9, 10]. The effectiveness of the treatment may be due to an extreme change in hepatic hemodynamics after the procedure. However, little is known of the hemodynamics in the liver either before or after BRTO [10]. We undertook this study to determine the degree of hemodynamic alteration that could be expected after BRTO by creating conditions similar to those that are in place before the actual therapeutic procedure is performed.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Patients
Between February 2000 and June 2002, nine patients (four women and five men; age range, 48–71 years old; mean age, 62.3 years) underwent BRTO for gastric varices caused by portal hypertension (which resulted from liver cirrhosis in eight patients and from primary biliary cirrhosis in one). In seven patients, liver function was classified as Child-Pugh A and in two as Child-Pugh B. Portasystemic encephalopathy was a complication in one patient. Criteria for admission into our study were the presence of a dilated gastrorenal shunt, no tumor lesions in the liver, no obstruction of the portal or hepatic vein, no stenosis of the celiac artery, and no abnormal circulation in the liver (e.g., major arterioportal venous shunting). All nine patients gave informed consent.

In all patients, endoscopy revealed active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or signs of recent bleeding or growing gastric varices or both. Before BRTO was performed, the patients underwent CT arterial portography via the splenic artery with and without balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt to simulate a change in hemodynamics of the portal vein in the liver.

BRTO Technique
We performed BRTO according to the method described by Kanagawa et al. [6], details of which have been described elsewhere [68]. In brief, this technique consists of applying a local anesthetic and inserting an 8-French catheter sheath-introducer (Catheter Introducer, Medikit, Tokyo, Japan) into the patient's right femoral vein. A 6.5-French balloon catheter with a 22-mm-diameter balloon (Artec Balloon catheter, Create Medics, Yokohama, Japan) is advanced to the left renal vein through the sheath-introducer, and the tip is wedged into the end of the gastrorenal shunt. The balloon is then inflated with carbon dioxide to occlude the vessel.

Using retrograde venography, we identified gastric varices and the inflowing and outflowing vessels and then determined the approximate dose of ethanolamine oleate necessary for obliteration. Contrast material was first cleared by deflating the balloon, and then the balloon was reinflated to occlude vessel flow. We administered 25–45 mL (mean, 37 mL) of a mixture of ethanolamine oleate iopamidol (5% solution) to fill the gastric varices that we had identified on retrograde venography and allowed the solution to remain in the vessel for 30 min, after which as much of the solution as possible was removed. During these procedures, 4,000 U of human haptoglobin was administered IV to prevent hemolysis-induced renal failure. We embolized the left inferior phrenic vein in two patients whose retrograde venographs showed that the vein had become another drainage vein for the gastric varices. Embolization was accomplished using microcoils via a microcatheter coaxially advanced from the balloon catheter inserted into the left renal vein in preparation for the BRTO. Splenic arteriography with and without single-detector helical CT was then performed in all patients to confirm the existence of a gastrorenal shunt and to evaluate the hemodynamics of the portal venous system.

Imaging Methods
With a 6.5-French balloon catheter already in place, we used the Seldinger technique to insert a 5-French angiographic catheter from the right inguinal region in the angiography room. After a test injection of contrast medium confirmed that the tip of the second catheter was in the splenic artery, the patient was transferred to the CT room. CT arterial portography was performed while the balloon of the catheter in the gastrorenal shunt was inflated and was repeated while the balloon was deflated, with an interval of approximately 10 min between each study.

CT arterial portography imaging was started 25–30 sec after the injection of 50–60 mL of 150 mgI/mL of iopamidol (Iopamiron, Schering, Berlin, Germany) at a rate of 2 mL/sec via the 5-French catheter, with its tip in the splenic artery. Each CT arterial portogram with and without balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt was acquired with the same amount of iopamidol administered at the same rate in every patient. Images were obtained on helical CT unit (X-Vigor Laudator, Toshiba Medical System, Tokyo, Japan) during a single breath-hold with the entire liver imaged using the parameters of 120 kV; 190 mA; beam width, 7 mm; and table feed speed, 7 mm/sec. Image reconstruction was performed with a width of 7 mm and a matrix of 512 x 512.

We returned the patient to the angiography room where digital subtraction angiography was performed via the 5-French catheter with its tip in the splenic artery without balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt; this procedure was followed by splenic arteriography with balloon occlusion. We used the same amount of contrast material delivered at the same rate of administration in every patient—20–25 mL of 370 mgI/mL of iopamidol injected at 4–5 mL/sec.

Investigated Parameters
Three radiologists experienced in abdominal diagnostic imaging analyzed the images, with final judgments made by consensus. The reviewers were aware that both portal phase splenic arteriography and CT arterial portography were performed with and without balloon occlusion. In reviewing the portal phase splenic arteriograms, the reviewers compared the visualization of the main portal vein and right and left branches of the portal vein shown on these images with those obtained with and without balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt.

Using the CT arterial portograms obtained while the balloon was inflated, we investigated the CT attenuation of the enhancement of the left and right branches of the portal vein, main portal vein, splenic vein, and inferior vena cava at the upper level of the cephalic site of the renal vein. Then, we retrospectively analyzed such changes after balloon deflation. We also examined changes in CT attenuation on CT arterial portography in the right and left lobes of liver parenchyma.

To quantify the CT attenuation of vessels and liver parenchyma, we measured the attenuation on CT arterial portograms using between one and five (mean, 4.1) 3- to 10-mm-diameter region-of-interest cursors. We placed the cursors over each vessel and calculated the average measurements of these regions of interest in each patient. We measured CT attenuation of the right or left lobe of the liver parenchyma by placing three to 10 (mean, 6.4) circular 10-mm region-of-interest cursors over the hepatic parenchyma, and the average measurements of these regions of interest were calculated in each patient, taking care to avoid measuring the regions of the hepatic arteries, veins, or portal branches. Attenuation of vessels and liver parenchyma on CT arterial portography after balloon catheter deflation was measured using the same regions of interest and locations used to measure attentuation when the balloon was inflated. Statistically, changes in the CT attenuation of vessels and liver parenchyma were analyzed using a paired Student's t test.


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In all patients, splenic arteriography during the portal phase without balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt provided clear visualization of the gastrorenal shunt infused with contrast material via the splenic artery, with the flow originating from the spleen and entering into the gastric region through the short gastric vein (Fig. 1A). In four patients, gastric varices were revealed as being simultaneously fed by the coronary vein with drainage into the gastrorenal shunt. The same study after inflation of the balloon positioned in the gastrorenal shunt (Fig. 1B) showed no decrease in visualization of evaluated vessels in any patient. In all patients, all branches of the portal vein in the liver could be seen. Table 1 provides details on visualization of intrahepatic portal venous branches with and without balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt.



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 61-year-old woman with gastric varices caused by liver cirrhosis. Splenic arteriograph obtained during portal phase shows hepatofugal portal flow originating from spleen flowing through short gastric vein and entering gastrorenal shunt (thin arrow) and left renal vein and inferior vena cava (thick arrow). Hepatopetal portal flow is not seen.

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 61-year-old woman with gastric varices caused by liver cirrhosis. Splenic arteriograph obtained during portal phase with balloon occlusion of gastrorenal shunt fails to reveal gastrorenal shunt, despite inflow from short gastric vein into gastric region and normal hemodynamics of portal venous system (arrows). Inferior vena cava is not visualized.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Intrahepatic Portal Venous System on Portal Phase Splenic Arteriography

 

In all patients, CT attenuation of the left and right branches of the portal vein and main portal vein on CT arterial portography with balloon occlusion decreased after deflation of the balloon, with the overall decrease varying from 9.7 to 180.7 H (mean, 54.7 H) in the left branch of the portal vein, from 14.8 to 139.2 H (mean, 52.2 H) in the right branch of the portal vein, and from 4.4 to 214.4 H (mean, 75.7 H) in the main portal vein. In eight (88.9%) of nine patients, CT attenuation of the splenic vein decreased; the overall decrease varied from – 0.5 to 326.4 H (mean, 65.5 H). In contrast, CT attenuation of the inferior vena cava in all patients increased; the overall increase varied from 7.6 to 152.2 H (mean, 49.0 H). CT attenuation of liver parenchyma decreased in 100% of patients (9/9) in the right lobe (range, 2.7–25.8 H; mean, 10.9 H) and in 88.9% (8/9) in the left lobe (range, from –9.6 to 9.1 H; mean, 3.1 H) (Figs. 1C and 1D).



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 61-year-old woman with gastric varices caused by liver cirrhosis. CT arterial portograph acquired through splenic artery with balloon occlusion of gastrorenal shunt reveals well-opacified portal venous system in liver (arrows) and minimal amount of contrast material in inferior vena cava.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 61-year-old woman with gastric varices caused by liver cirrhosis. CT arterial portograph acquired through splenic artery without balloon occlusion of gastrorenal shunt shows poor enhancement of portal venous system in liver and dense opacification of inferior vena cava (thick arrow) and gastrorenal shunt (thin arrow). Enhancement of liver parenchyma is not as pronounced as depicted on C.

 

As shown in Table 2, the mean attenuation value on CT arterial portography with balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt was higher in the bilateral branches of the portal vein, main portal vein, and splenic vein in the vessels we evaluated and in the bilateral lobes of the liver parenchyma than the mean attenuation value of these vessels and lobes on CT arterial portography without balloon occlusion of the gastrorenal shunt; however, this attentuation value was lower in the inferior vena cava. Statistically significant differences in CT attenuation values after balloon deflation were decreased in the right branch of the portal vein, main portal vein, and right lobe of the liver parenchyma and increased in the inferior vena cava.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Statistical Comparison of CT Attenuation Values of Vessels and Hepatic Parenchyma With and Without Balloon Occlusion of a Gastrorenal Shunt

 

On endoscopy performed 1–2 months after BRTO, gastric varices had disappeared in seven patients and the size of the varices had remarkably decreased in the other two patients. To date, no patient has experienced a rupture of gastric varices. Encephalopathy-related symptoms in the patient with portasystemic encephalopathy were relieved. In two patients, esophageal varices increased 6 and 8 months, respectively, after BRTO. No complication related to BRTO has occurred; no decline in liver function has been noted.


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Treatments for portal hypertension can be roughly classified into two types: shunt occlusion and shunt creation [3]. The latter type of therapies, including a transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic venous shunt, are associated with a potentially serious complication—deterioration of liver function caused by a decreased portal flow after shunt creation [1113]. BRTO is a shunt occlusion therapy and is performed to prevent rupture of gastric varices resulting from portal hypertension. In 1984, Olson et al. [14] first described a patient with gastric varices treated with BRTO using ethanol as the sclerotic agent; however, the treatment did not result in disappearance of the gastric varices. Since the preliminary report by Kanagawa et al. [6] describing the use of ethanolamine oleate iopamidol as a sclerotic agent, other studies of the effectiveness of BRTO for gastric varices have been reported.

The effectiveness of BRTO as a treatment for hepatic encephalopathy caused by a portasystemic shunt has been well documented [5, 9, 10, 15]. Ohmoto et al. [15] reported improvement after BRTO in a patient with liver cirrhosis in whom gastric varices were accompanied by portasystemic encephalopathy. Kato et al. [9] reported on six patients in whom clinical evidence of portasystemic encephalopathy disappeared after BRTO within 2 days after the treatment, and the patients remained free from encephalopathy during the following 6 months. Also, 1 month after BRTO, the patients' serum ammonia levels were significantly reduced compared with the levels before treatment. This reduction was sustained for up to 12 months. Another case report found that BRTO of a splenorenal shunt led to improvement in a patient with portasystemic encephalopathy [16]. With regard to improvement of liver function after BRTO, Akahane et al. [10] noted that in all nine patients who underwent BRTO, the 15-min retention rate of indocyanine green significantly improved from a mean of 31.8% (SD, ± 16.1%) to a mean of 21.8% (± 12.4%) within 3 weeks after the treatment. Fukuda et al. [5] found an improvement in the Child-Pugh scores for 50% of 43 patients with gastric varices or portasystemic encephalopathy or both 6 months after BRTO. These researchers also described the disappearance of symptoms in all patients with portasystemic encephalopathy (n = 11).

We performed portal phase splenic arteriography and CT arterial portography via the splenic artery under conditions similar to those induced by BRTO (i.e., during balloon occlusion of gastrorenal shunt) and found that hepatopetal portal venous flow was more clearly seen and that enhancement of the intrahepatic portal vein and liver parenchyma was stronger than on the imaging performed without balloon occlusion. However, enhancement of the inferior vena cava was more blurred in imaging performed with balloon occlusion. These phenomena led us to suggest that the reported improvement of portasystemic encephalopathy or liver function after BRTO is the result of the closure of the large hepatofugal portasystemic shunt (i.e., gastrorenal shunt) and the consequent switch of portal flow from hepatofugal to hepatopetal, which in turn increases effective intrahepatic portal blood flow. In another study evaluating the change in hemodynamics after BRTO, Akahane et al. [10] found that hepatopetal portal flow visualized on Doppler sonography increased from a mean of 5.4 (± 1.1) cm/sec to a mean of 7.85 (± 1.4) cm/sec.

In conclusion, our results strongly support the idea that BRTO is useful as a treatment for portasystemic encephalopathy or liver dysfunction, as well as a treatment for gastric varices resulting from portal hypertension, which has been the usual indication for the procedure. However, a limitation of our study is that it fails to clarify to whether the change in hemodynamics engendered by the treatment persists over a long-term follow-up period. To our knowledge, scant information on long-term observation of hemodynamics exists in the literature. Clinically or biochemically evident recrudescence of liver function 6–12 months after BRTO has been reported [5, 9, 10]. Before undertaking BRTO therapy, researchers may need to determine whether effective hemodynamics of the intrahepatic portal vein could be achieved in a particular patient by performing splenic arteriography and CT arterial portography as we described. However, our study shows that CT arterial portography with or without balloon occlusion is more sensitive than conventional portography with or without balloon occlusion.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP, Murthy NS, Makwana UK. Prevalence, classification, and natural history of gastric varices: a long-term follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology1992; 16:1343 –1349[Medline]
  2. Watanabe K, Kimura K, Matsutani S, Ohto M, Okuda K. Portal hemodynamics in patients with gastric varices: a study in 230 patients with esophageal and/or gastric varices using portal vein catheterization. Gastroenterology1988; 95:434 –440[Medline]
  3. Pagliaro L, D'Amico G, Luca A, et al. Portal hypertension: diagnosis and treatment. J Hepatol1995; 23[suppl 1]:36 –44
  4. Trudeau W, Prindiville T. Endoscopic injection sclerosis in bleeding gastric varices. Gastrointest Endosc1986; 32:264 –268[Medline]
  5. Fukuda T, Hirota S, Sugimura K. Long-term results of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for the treatment of gastric varices and hepatic encephalopathy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:327 –336[Medline]
  6. Kanagawa H, Mima S, Kouyama H, Gotoh K, Uchida T, Okuda K. Treatment of gastric fundal varices by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration. J Gastroenterol Hepatol1996; 11:51 –58[Medline]
  7. Koito K, Namieno T, Nagakawa T, Morita K. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices with gastrorenal or gastrocaval collaterals. AJR1996; 167:1317 –1320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hirota S, Matsumoto S, Tomita M, Sako M, Kono M. Retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices. Radiology1999; 211:349 –356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kato T, Uematsu T, Nishigaki Y, Sugihara J, Tomita E, Moriwaki H. Therapeutic effect of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration on portal-systemic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Intern Med2001; 40:688 –691[Medline]
  10. Akahane T, Iwasaki T, Kobayashi N, et al. Changes in liver function parameters after occlusion of gastrorenal shunts with balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:1026 –1030[Medline]
  11. Somberg KA. TIPS: safe, effective, better? (editorial) Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92 :1412 –1416[Medline]
  12. Rodriguez-Laiz JM, Banares R, Echenagusia A, et al. Effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics, and hepatic function in patients with portal hypertension: preliminary results. Dig Dis Sci1995; 40:2121 –2127[Medline]
  13. Ochs A, Rossle M, Haag K, et al. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedure for refractory ascites. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1192 –1197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Olson E, Yune HY, Klatte EC. Transrenal-vein reflux ethanol sclerosis of gastroesophageal varices. AJR1984; 143:627 –628[Free Full Text]
  15. Ohmoto K, Miyake I, Tsuduki M, Ohno S, Yamamoto S. Control of solitary gastric fundal varices and portosystemic encephalopathy accompanying liver cirrhosis by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO): a case report. Hepatogastroenterology1999; 46:1249 -1252[Medline]
  16. Kawanaka H, Ohta M, Hashizume M, et al. Portosystemic encephalopathy treated with balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration. Am J Gastroenterol1995; 90:508 –510[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Ninoi, N. Nishida, T. Kaminou, Y. Sakai, T. Kitayama, M. Hamuro, R. Yamada, K. Nakamura, T. Arakawa, and Y. Inoue
Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varices with Gastrorenal Shunt: Long-Term Follow-Up in 78 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1340 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamagami, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nishimura, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS