AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:167-172
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Glycosaminoglycan Distribution in Cartilage as Determined by Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC): Potential Clinical Applications

Ashley Williams1, Amy Gillis1, Charles McKenzie1, Bruce Po1, Leena Sharma2, Lyle Micheli3, Brian McKeon4 and Deborah Burstein1

1 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 4 Blackfan Cir., Rm. 147, Boston, MA 02115.
2 Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Medical School, 300 E Superior St., Tarry 3-713, Chicago, IL 60611.
3 Division of Sports Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, 319 Longwood Ave., Sixth Floor, Boston, MA 02115.
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, ProSports Orthopedics, 840 Winter St., Waltham, MA 02451.

Received April 10, 2003; accepted after revision July 30, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to D. Burstein.

Supported by a clinical sciences grant and a biomarkers–biomedical sciences grant from the Arthritis Foundation.


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. We sought to describe a range of in vivo observations of glycosaminoglycan distribution in knee cartilage using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage technique.

CONCLUSION. The index of glycosaminoglycan distribution, T1Gd, can exceed 500 msec (denoting high glycosaminoglycan) or can be less than 300 msec, with focal areas as low as 240 msec. Compartmental differences, as well as focal defects within the knee, were observed in patients who had sustained injuries to the ligaments and menisci of the knee or who had chronic osteoarthritis. Overall, these results suggest the need for further research into the biochemical changes seen during disease progression and the effects of therapeutic interventions.


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Much of the compressive strength of cartilage is derived from the glycosaminoglycan molecules in the extracellular matrix. These molecules have abundant carboxyl and sulfate groups that are negatively charged under physiologic conditions [1]. When glycosaminoglycans are lost from the cartilage matrix, as occurs in trauma or osteoarthritis, the mechanical stiffness of the tissue is dramatically reduced, and the functional integrity of the cartilage is compromised. Maintaining and restoring glycosaminoglycans in adequate concentrations in the extracellular matrix are therefore important targets for therapeutic interventions. Understanding the loss and replenishment of glycosaminoglycans is potentially important in determining the correct diagnosis early, monitoring the disease, and selecting treatments.

MRI can play a critical role in the evaluation of morphologic cartilage abnormalities and also has potential use in the evaluation of the molecular status of cartilage. In this report, we focus on one of several molecular imaging techniques under development—delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC)—as a tool for estimating glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage. The term "delayed" in the name of the technique refers to the time required for the gadolinium agent to penetrate the cartilage tissue.

Because of the abundance of charged side chains on the glycosaminoglycan molecules, the distribution of the mobile ions reflects the glycosaminoglycan concentration in the cartilage, when allowed sufficient time to distribute in the cartilage. One of the most common MRI contrast agents, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex, Wayne, NJ), which is sometimes referred to as Gd-DTPA2–, has a negative charge. Given time to penetrate into cartilage, this gadolinium agent is distributed in higher concentrations in areas of cartilage in which the glycosaminoglycan content is relatively low and in lower concentrations in regions rich in glycosaminoglycans. Because the gadolinium inversely affects the MRI parameter T1, measurement of T1 after full penetration of the contrast agent (T1Gd) is used as an index of concentration of the contrast agent in the cartilage and is proportional to the glycosaminoglycan concentration in the tissue. A low level of glycosaminoglycans is associated with a high concentration of gadolinium and results in a measurement of low T1Gd value. Therefore, the T1Gd index varies directly with glycosaminoglycan concentration.

The dGEMRIC technique has been validated in both basic scientific and clinical studies as reflecting the glycosaminoglycan concentration in cartilage [27]. The potential of this technique to reveal clinically relevant information has begun to emerge through several recent reports of focused pilot studies of dose-response and compartmental differences in asymptomatic individuals [8], autologous chondrocyte transplants [9], arthroscopically determined cartilage softening [10], and hip dysplasia [11].

These reports have led to the performance of larger clinical trials to better delineate the usefulness of dGEMRIC. Previous studies have reported a mean T1Gd index for the area of interest in the cartilage or have covered focused clinical conditions, but designing large trials requires a better understanding of the range of values expected under different conditions and within joints. Through a series of case studies, we sought to determine a dynamic range of T1Gd index values seen in several individuals, the level of heterogeneity that can be observed within the joint of a given individual, and the levels of changes that might be seen over time. These case studies also provide the basis for hypotheses regarding physiologic and pathologic data that might be addressed in future studies.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
For this study, 23 volunteers were imaged using the dGEMRIC technique. All examinations were performed with approval of the institutional review board at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and with informed consent. Volunteers were injected IV with 0.2 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine and asked to walk for at least 10 min to facilitate the transport of the charged gadolinium agent into the cartilage [12]. Ninety minutes after injection, volunteers were imaged with a 1.5-T Symphony (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) or Twin Speed Excite (General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI) MRI body scanner.

A series of T1-weighted images was acquired using a fast inversion recovery spin-echo sequence with five to seven inversion delays ranging from 25 to 1,680 msec (TR/TE, 1,800/14). Coronal, sagittal, or axial views were collected in a 512 x 512 matrix with an in-plane resolution of 275–350 µm. Sections were 3 mm thick. The scanning time was 15 min per image.

We used Matlab software (The MathWorks, Natick, MA) to generate T1Gd maps depicting areas determined by hand segmentation to be cartilage, using a pixel-by-pixel three-parameter T1 fit and a custom-designed interface [13]. The color-coded (Fig. 1) T1Gd-calculated maps were then superimposed on one of the inversion recovery images for display. The T1Gd index was taken as an average of the T1Gd values in a given region of interest; unless otherwise stated, the region of interest for a compartment in a sagittal image was that of the weight-bearing femoral cartilage and all of the tibial cartilage (Fig. 2A). In the coronal image, the region of interest consisted of all of the cartilage in that view (Fig. 2B).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Color scale of glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) index used in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage technique. Blue–green end of scale represents high T1Gd values, meaning high glycosaminoglycan levels. Red end of scale represents low T1Gd values, meaning low glycosaminoglycan concentrations.

 


View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A. Global and focal ranges of glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) index. Sagittal T1Gd image of lateral compartment in 26-year-old female professional dancer shows high-range (blue–green areas) T1Gd values (mean ± SD, 547 ± 121 msec) for tibial plateau and weight-bearing zones of femoral condyle compartments (arrows).

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B. Global and focal ranges of glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) index. Coronal T1Gd image of 28-year-old asymptomatic female volunteer shows T1Gd index in mid range (448 ± 89 msec) across all compartments.

 


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Figure 2A, 2B, 2C shows the range of T1Gd values that might be observed clinically. The T1Gd index of the cartilage of the knees of a professional dancer was in the high range, with a global mean exceeding 500 msec (Fig. 2A). Similar values were measured in three other professional dancers (mean for all four dancers, 519 ± 8 msec). T1Gd indexes of 400–500 msec are in the mid range of the cases studied (Fig. 2B). Low-end T1Gd indexes (< 400 msec) have been seen in cartilage in individuals with moderate to severe osteoarthritis (Fig. 2C). Indexes in focal areas (e.g., between the arrows in Fig. 2C) can be as low as 240 msec. The three patients in Figure 2A, 2B, 2C displayed relatively homogeneous T1Gd values across the imaged section. Other patients exhibited more generalized differences across compartments. A patient with an anterior cruciate ligament tear (Fig. 3A) exhibited distinctly lower lateral T1Gd values, as did two of the three volunteers scheduled for anterior cruciate ligament repair surgery.



View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C. Global and focal ranges of glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) index. Sagittal T1Gd image of 78-year-old woman with moderately severe medial osteoarthritis reveals T1Gd values in low range (red areas) (285 ± 74 msec) for medial femoral condyle with focal area (arrows) displaying lower values (243 ± 56 msec). Mean T1Gd index of surrounding cartilage was 312 ± 75 msec.

 


View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. Compartmental differences in glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) index. Coronal T1Gd image of 19-year-old woman obtained before surgery to repair anterior cruciate ligament injured 2 months earlier reveals overall mid-range index values. Low-range values (red areas) are seen at superficial boundaries and throughout lateral femoral condyle, with T1Gd index (mean ± SD) of compartment measured at 340 ± 65 msec. Medial femoral condyle (MFC) and medial tibial plateau (MTP) have higher T1Gd values (blue–green areas) than are seen in lateral femoral condyle (LFC) and lateral tibial plateau (LTP): MFC/LFC = 1.12, MTP/LTP = 1.25.

 

Striking heterogeneity can also be observed within the cartilage tissue. Figure 4A was obtained in a patient in whom the medial patellar cartilage was denuded. The remaining cartilage on the lateral side has an area of focally low T1Gd values and an area of mid-range T1Gd values. Similarly, Figure 4B shows the lateral compartment in a patient with medial osteoarthritis. Although the cartilage in the lateral compartment was relatively intact anatomically, focal areas had T1Gd values 35% lower than surrounding cartilage.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. Focal variations in glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) images. Axial T1Gd image obtained in 63-year-old woman with osteoarthritis (diagnosed on basis of radiographic findings of osteophyte and clinical knee symptoms) and evidence of medial patellar subluxation and medial patellofemoral narrowing. Patella shows lateral lesion (red area) with mean index (mean ± SD, 289 ± 47 msec) 30% lower than that of adjacent tissue (423 ± 96 msec). Low T1Gd levels may be precursor to frank cartilage loss such as that seen in medial patella.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. Focal variations in glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) images. Sagittal T1Gd image of 69-year-old woman with moderately severe medial osteoarthritis reveals that lateral compartment, which appeared unaffected on radiograph (not shown), has numerous focal areas of low T1Gd values (red areas), with mean value of 281 ± 47 msec. Index of T1Gd in surrounding cartilage (green areas) was 435 ± 79 msec.

 

We monitored several individuals longitudinally. The variation within the T1Gd index in four asymptomatic volunteers during a 6-month period was found to be less than 10%. T1Gd was also monitored in 10 volunteers taking a supplement containing glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate (CosaminDS, Nutramax Laboratories, Edgewood, MD). Four volunteers who are professional dancers (those reported in the discussion of T1Gd index in patient imaged in Fig. 2A) took the supplements and showed no change after 6 months. Increases of 13% and 19% were seen in two volunteers who took the supplements while recovering from arthroscopic surgery (Fig. 5A). The T1Gd index in three other volunteers recovering from arthroscopic surgery did not change significantly. The T1Gd index in one volunteer with a history of knee injuries (patellar fracture and meniscectomy) decreased 9%; he reported that he had stopped running while taking the supplements. These results are summarized in Figure 6. Long-term changes in the T1Gd index in focal areas of an osteoarticular transfer system procedure were also observed (Fig. 7A, 7B). The T1Gd index increased 20% at the implant site during the period of 7–20 months after the transplantation, whereas the index at the harvest sites decreased 20–25% during the same period.



View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A. Medial sagittal glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) images of 49-year-old woman recovering from arthroscopic knee surgery. Red areas represent low T1Gd values and blue–green areas represent high T1Gd values. Comparison of image obtained before patient began taking nutritional supplements (A) with image obtained 6 months after she began taking glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate supplements (B) (CosaminDS, Nutramax Laboratories, Edgewood, MD) reveals 19% increase in T1Gd.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6. Plot of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) index values for glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) in 10 volunteers who were followed for 6 months while taking glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate supplements (CosaminDS, Nutramax Laboratories, Edgewood, MD). Stars denote significant (p < 0.05) changes over 6-month period (two volunteers with increased values, and one with decreased values).

 


View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. Lateral sagittal glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) images obtained in 30-year-old man who underwent osteoarticular transfer system procedure. Red areas represent low T1Gd values and blue–green areas represent high T1Gd values. Comparison of images obtained 7 (A) and 20 (B) months after procedure shows T1Gd index at implant site (open arrow) increased 20% during interval between imaging examinations. T1Gd indexes at harvest sites (solid arrows) decreased 20–25%.

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. Lateral sagittal glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) images obtained in 30-year-old man who underwent osteoarticular transfer system procedure. Red areas represent low T1Gd values and blue–green areas represent high T1Gd values. Comparison of images obtained 7 (A) and 20 (B) months after procedure shows T1Gd index at implant site (open arrow) increased 20% during interval between imaging examinations. T1Gd indexes at harvest sites (solid arrows) decreased 20–25%.

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our findings show that T1Gd values seen clinically can exceed 500 msec or measure less than 300 msec (mean of a cartilage segment) or, in focal areas, less than 250 msec. A relatively large dynamic range is also seen within an individual joint: differences of 35% were seen focally across tissue. These indexes were found for images obtained at 1.5 T, with a double-dose injection of the gadolinium agent. We expect the values to differ when different field strengths or dose levels are used.

The dynamic range and heterogeneity that we found indicate a need for grading schemes that take these factors into account. For example, the mean value of a compartment may be a useful metric of the overall biochemical status of that compartment (e.g., Fig. 2A, 2B, 2C), whereas a metric of heterogeneity or the number of voxels below a certain T1Gd cutoff, as a metric of lesions (e.g., Fig. 4A, 4B), may differentiate segments of cartilage similar in overall biochenical status. Large clinical studies can be used retrospectively to better define the combination of metrics best suited for the clinical question under investigation. This technique can be implemented in any MRI center because the pulse sequences are available on any standard clinical scanner, and the analysis could be run on most standard computer systems. Segmentation of the cartilage area within an imaging section is currently the only step requiring user interaction.Go,Go



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. Compartmental differences in glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) index. Coronal T1Gd image of 78-year-old man with no reported history of knee injury (although image reveals medial meniscal abnormalities) shows overall T1Gd index value in mid range. Medial compartment has slightly lower values than does lateral compartment. Both MFC and MTP show lower index values than LFC and LTP: MFC/LFC = 0.81, MTP/LTP = 0.85.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. Compartmental differences in glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) index. Sagittal T1Gd image of 53-year-old man obtained 10 years after medial meniscectomy shows extensive medial degradation. Large region of distinctly lower T1Gd index values are seen in femoral condyle, with sharp demarcation between that region and surrounding cartilage. T1Gd index of degraded area (red) is 35% lower (289 ± 63 msec) than index of surrounding tissue (440 ± 74 msec).

 

The cases that we presented point to several areas of potential further investigation. Our findings of high levels of glycosaminoglycans in the professional dancers is consistent with the results of a recent study that reported that individuals who exercise regularly have higher T1Gd indexes (denoting higher glycosaminoglycan levels) than individuals who are sedentary (Tiderius CJ et al., presented at the Orthopaedic Research Society meeting, 2003). Similarly, the decrease in the T1Gd index that we found in the volunteer taking supplements who had stopped running might be an indication of the effects of activity. Further studies can be designed to investigate the effect of starting exercise regimens on short- and long-term T1Gd indexes.Go



View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B. Medial sagittal glycosaminoglycan distribution (T1Gd) images of 49-year-old woman recovering from arthroscopic knee surgery. Red areas represent low T1Gd values and blue–green areas represent high T1Gd values. Comparison of image obtained before patient began taking nutritional supplements (A) with image obtained 6 months after she began taking glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate supplements (B) (CosaminDS, Nutramax Laboratories, Edgewood, MD) reveals 19% increase in T1Gd.

 

Other researchers have found lower medial T1Gd values in an asymptomatic population [8]. In our study, we found severe medial degradation in a patient 10 years after medial meniscectomy and a reversal of this pattern, with lower T1Gd values seen laterally, in patients after an injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. Collectively, these findings warrant longitudinal studies of the effects of differing biomechanical environments on cartilage.

T1Gd indexes found in patients with early osteoarthritis were correlated with arthroscopic findings in an earlier study [10] in which global values of the T1Gd index were reported. Our images show more detail regarding the biochemical status of the tissue across the joint. The heterogeneities, with focal lesions as exhibiting indexes as low as 240 msec, may represent areas potentially amenable to disease-modifying interventions to halt or reverse the biochemical degradation. These focal lesions have been documented previously in T1Gd and histologic studies of excised human knee joint samples [3]

We found the T1Gd indexes in asymptomatic individuals in our study were stable (within 10%) during a 6-month period. Among volunteers taking nutritional supplements, two individuals had increases in T1Gd values and one had a decrease. The reason for these changes is not known and may or may not be attributable to the supplements, surgery, change in mobility of the joint, or other factors. We found it interesting that the increases were seen in those with low initial values, suggesting that the individuals with low T1Gd indexes may be more likely to benefit from such interventions. The fact that any change was observed suggests that dGEMRIC may be useful for monitoring the effects of various pharmacologic interventions in controlled trials.

In a cross-sectional study of patients who had received autologous chondrocyte transplants, researchers found that during the initial postoperative period, the tissue had filled in but had a low T1Gd index, suggesting that little glycosaminoglycan had accumulated in the transplants. By 12–18 months after the transplantation, the transplants, with one exception, showed T1Gd indexes that were approximately the same as those of the surrounding cartilage [9]. Another study noted low glycosaminoglycan concentration as measured by T1Gd in a series of patients with transplants; these findings were confirmed through biochemical analysis after biopsy (Dahlberg L et al., presented at the Orthopaedic Research Society meeting, 2003). Findings in our patient who had undergone osteoarticular transfer and in the previous studies indicate the need for a prospective study to determine if T1Gd might be useful as a predictor of successful implantation. The T1Gd images suggest that the dGEMRIC technique could be useful for noninvasively monitoring the long-term progress of patients who have undergone osteoarticular transfer and other cartilage therapies.

In summary, the delineation of dynamic ranges that can be expected clinically with T1Gd will help to determine sequence parameters necessary to quantitate T1Gd indexes in longitudinal studies. Likewise, the heterogeneity and levels of changes observed will aid in the planning of future studies and the determination of applications for which the dGEMRIC technique may be appropriate. Although the potentially clinically relevant observations of the individuals in our study have yet to be confirmed in larger studies, our findings underscore the opportunity provided by this noninvasive technique to monitor changes in glycosaminoglycan concentration and to better understand the biomechanical and biochemical mediators of cartilage homeostasis and alterations in disease.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank Wei Li for assistance with the MRI scanning.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Freeman M. Adult articular cartilage. London, England: Pitman Medical, 1979
  2. Bashir A, Gray ML, Burstein D. Gd-DTPA2– as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med1996; 36:665 –673 [erratum published in Magn Reson Med 1996;36:964][Medline]
  3. Bashir A, Gray ML, Hartke J, Burstein D. Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:857 –865[Medline]
  4. Trattnig S, Mlynarik V, Breitenseher M, et al. MRI visualization of proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage via intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA. Magn Reson Imaging1999; 17:577 –583[Medline]
  5. Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Silvennoinen J, et al. Spatial assessment of articular cartilage proteoglycans with Gd-DTPA-enhanced T1 imaging. Magn Reson Med2002; 48:640 –648[Medline]
  6. Petersen EF, Fishbein KW, Laouar L, Spencer RG, Wenz JF. Ex vivo magnetic resonance microscopy of an osteochondral transfer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:603 –608[Medline]
  7. Laurent D, Wasvary J, Rudin M, O'Byrne E, Pellas T. In vivo assessment of macromolecular content in articular cartilage of the goat knee. Magn Reson Med2003; 49:1037 –1046[Medline]
  8. Tiderius CJ, Olsson LE, de Verdier H, Leander P, Ekberg O, Dahlberg L. Gd-DTPA2--enhanced MRI of femoral knee cartilage: a dose-response study in healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:1067 –1071[Medline]
  9. Gillis A, Bashir A, McKeon B, Scheller A, Gray ML, Burstein D. Magnetic resonance imaging of relative glycosaminoglycan distribution in patients with autologous chondrocyte transplants. Invest Radiol 2001;36:743 –748[Medline]
  10. Tiderius CJ, Olsson LE, Leander P, Ekberg O, Dahlberg L. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in early knee osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med2003; 49:488 –492[Medline]
  11. Kim YJ, Jaramillo D, Millis M, Gray ML, Burstein D. Assessment of early osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia with delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the cartiliage. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 2003;85:1987 –1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT, et al. Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)2–-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med2001; 45:36 –41[Medline]
  13. Po B. Graphical interface for quantitative T1 and T2 mapping of MRI data. (master's thesis). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001 (code and instructions available at:http://radiology.bidmc.harvard.edu/research/cartilage/) Accessed April 1, 2003

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Pinker, P. Szomolanyi, G. C. Welsch, T. C. Mamisch, S. Marlovits, A. Stadlbauer, and S. Trattnig
Longitudinal Evaluation of Cartilage Composition of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplants with 3-T Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of Cartilage
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1391 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. R. Duc, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, P. P. Koch, F. Kalberer, and J. Hodler
Articular Cartilage Defects Detected with 3D Water-Excitation True FISP: Prospective Comparison with Sequences Commonly Used for Knee Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 216 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. K. Shindle, L. F. Foo, B. T. Kelly, A. J. Khanna, B. G. Domb, A. Farber, T. Wanich, and H. G. Potter
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage in the Athlete: Current Techniques and Spectrum of Disease
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(suppl_4): 27 - 46.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. A. Young, P. Stanwell, A. Williams, J. A. Rohrsheim, D. A. Parker, B. Giuffre, and A. M. Ellis
Glycosaminoglycan Content of Knee Cartilage Following Posterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Demonstrated by Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2763 - 2767.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Burstein, A. Williams, C. McKenzie, K. Woertler, and E. J. Rummeny
Potential for Misinterpretation of Combined T1- and T2-weighted Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Cartilage * Drs Woertler and Rummeny respond:
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 619 - 622.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, A.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS