AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Jongh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Parizel, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Jongh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Parizel, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 182:1551-1553
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

"William Tell" Injury: MDCT of an Arrow Through the Head

Katrijn de Jongh1, Dinska Dohmen2, Rodrigo Salgado1, Özkan Özsarlak1, Johan W. M. Van Goethem1, Luc Beaucourt2, Philippe G. Jorens3, Tony W. Van Havenbergh4, Arthur M. De Schepper1 and Paul M. Parizel1

1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem 2650, Belgium.
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem 2650, Belgium.
3 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem 2650, Belgium.
4 Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem 2650, Belgium.

Received June 16, 2003; accepted after revision August 18, 2003.

 
Address correspondence to K. de Jongh (katrijn.de.jongh{at}uza.be).


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Crossbow injuries to the head are extremely rare [18]. Most documented cases are suicide attempts, often with fatal outcomes. We describe a 22-year-old man with a self-inflicted crossbow head injury who survived. The position of the arrow and the associated bone and soft-tissue abnormalities are shown using a 16-MDCT scanner and postprocessing reformations. We also present an overview of all reported cases of crossbow injuries to the brain.


Case Report
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
A 22-year-old man attempted to commit suicide by shooting an aluminum crossbow arrow through his mouth. The arrow entered the skull through the oral cavity and exited the skull near the vertex (Fig. 1A). When the mobile emergency medical team arrived, the patient was fully conscious but was blind in his right eye and complained of a left-sided hemiparesis. The patient was intubated and ventilated, and his head was immobilized. Initial treatment consisted of IV administration of corticosteroids and analgetics. Sixteen-MDCT scans were obtained when the patient arrived at the hospital (Figs. 1B and 1D).



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 22-year-old man with crossbow injury of head. Left lateral photograph taken at patient's arrival in emergency department shows that crossbow arrow enters through mouth and exits skull near vertex. Patient has been intubated and ventilated, and his head has been immobilized.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 22-year-old man with crossbow injury of head. Axial MDCT scan obtained through sellar region shows aluminum arrow (black arrow) in right optic canal. White arrow shows proximal part of right optic nerve near optic chiasm.

 


View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 22-year-old man with crossbow injury of head. Sagittal multiplanar MDCT reformation reveals entire trajectory of arrow shaft (arrows). Note that aluminum shaft is hollow.

 

Axial CT scans documented the trajectory of the arrow. It penetrated the right ethmoidal and sphenoid sinuses, passed through the right optic canal, entered the cranial cavity immediately lateral to the anterior cerebral arteries, continued vertically through the right periventricular area and right frontal deep white matter, and finally exited through the frontal skull near the vertex. The right-sided blindness was presumably caused by injury to the optic nerve, and the leftsided hemiparesis was caused by right hemispheric parenchymal injury. Multiplanar CT reformatting was performed in the sagittal plane to document the entire trajectory of the hollow arrow shaft. The relationship of the arrow to the skull base and cranial vault was documented using a volume-rendering technique with virtual removal of the occipital bone.

The patient immediately underwent surgery. The arrowhead was removed, and the shaft of the missile was extracted through the mouth. An external ventricular drain was inserted.

Postoperatively, the patient was transferred to the neurosurgical ICU. He developed sepsis and was treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics for 3 weeks. Intracranial hypertension was not observed. On postoperative day 15, the patient underwent a second surgical intervention because of a cerebrospinal fluid leak through the mouth—the arrow tract was partially filled with autologous fat from the thigh. A follow-up CT scan showed no signs of cerebritis. CT angiography revealed no evidence of a posttraumatic aneurysm. The patient recovered amazingly well and was discharged from the neurosurgical ICU tp the ward on day 20 with a right-sided hemianopsia and slight paresis of the left leg. On day 31, the patient was discharged from the hospital in stable condition.


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 
Crossbow injuries to the head are rare, with only a handful of cases reported in the literature [18] (Table 1). Most documented cases were self-inflicted injuries that often had fatal outcomes. Compared with firearm projectiles, aluminum crossbow arrows have a relatively low velocity (as fast as 58 m/sec), but their sharpness and kinetic energy are sufficient to cause penetrating skull injuries [2]. A study of the ballistics of experimental arrow wounds by Karger et al. [3] showed that the penetration mechanism of an arrow is distinct from that of a bullet, because of the extremely sharp cutting edge of the arrowhead. Because of the sharp force applied by arrows, injury is limited to the tissues that are directly incised by the blade of the arrowhead [3]. From both a patient treatment and a forensic point of view, the arrow should be left in situ and stabilized to limit motion in transport until the patient reaches surgery. The shaft of the arrow in situ appears to exert pressure on the wound, thus functioning as an incomplete tamponade. Because the tip of the sports arrow is the same diameter as the shaft, these lesions can be survivable. In our patient, the trajectory of the crossbow arrow was slightly anterior to the cavernous sinus and lateral to the anterior cerebral arteries, which prevented fatal vascular injury. However, the right optic nerve was damaged and caused a permanent right-sided loss of vision.GoGo


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Reported Cases of Brain Injury Caused by Crossbow Arrows

 


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 22-year-old man with crossbow injury of head. Axial MDCT scan obtained through centrum semiovale shows subarachnoid hemorrhage over right cerebral hemisphere and parenchymal hemorrhage (arrows) around arrow shaft.

 


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E. 22-year-old man with crossbow injury of head. Image obtained with volume-rendering technique after virtual removal of occipital bone shows vertical trajectory of arrow (arrows).

 

MDCT is the technology of choice for acquiring CT data in a complex neurotrauma case. The increased spatial resolution allows for high-quality 3D postprocessing [9]. In this case, volume-rendered and multiplanar reformatted images provided clinically relevant information for the management of this complex neurotrauma. The reformatted images clearly depict the anatomic relationships and are much easier to interpret than hundreds of thin axial images, especially for nonradiologists. Postprocessing techniques also allow the radiologist and treating neurosurgeon to explore the findings together interactively on a workstation and improve their preoperative evaluation of the patient.

In conclusion, crossbow injuries to the head are rare and pose a medical and surgical challenge. This case illustrates the potential of 3D images as aids in treating complex penetrating neurotrauma. With postprocessing, the total acquired scanning volume is represented on a few significant views with a high degree of accuracy, thereby accentuating the diagnostically relevant details and facilitating the planning of further therapy.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
References
 

  1. Franklin GA, Lukan JK. Self-inflicted crossbow injury to the head. J Trauma 2002;52:1009[Medline]
  2. Byard RW, Koszyca B, James R. Crossbow suicide: mechanisms of injury and neuropathologic findings. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1999;20:347 –353[Medline]
  3. Karger B, Sudhues H, Beat P, Kneubuehl MS, Brinkmann B. Experimental arrow wounds; ballistics and traumatology. J Trauma 1998;45:495 –501[Medline]
  4. Downs JC, Nichols CA, Scala-Barnett D, Lifschultz BD. Handling and interpretation of crossbow injuries. J Forensic Sci1994; 39:428 –445[Medline]
  5. Opeskin K, Burke M. Suicide using multiple crossbow arrows. Am J Forensic Med Pathol1994; 15:14 –17[Medline]
  6. Rogers C, Dowell S, Choi JH, Sathyavagiswaran I. Crossbow injuries. J Forensic Sci1990; 35:886 –890[Medline]
  7. Salam A, Eyres KS, Magides AD, Cleary J. Penetrating brain stem injury from crossbow bolt: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Emerg Med1990; 7:224 –227[Medline]
  8. Joly LM, Oswald AM, Disdet M, Raggueneau JL. Difficult endotracheal intubation as a result of penetrating cranio-facial injury by an arrow. Anesth Analg2002; 94:231 –232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK. Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: musculoskeletal applications. RadioGraphics1999; 19:1143 –1160[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Jongh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Parizel, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Jongh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Parizel, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS