AJR 2004; 182:1604-1605
© American Roentgen Ray Society
Pelvic Lipomatosis Detected on Bone Scintigraphy
Joseph W. Sam,
Abass Alavi,
Marc P. Banner and
Parvati Ramchandani
Radiology Regional Center Fort Myers, FL 33901
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Philadelphia, PA
19104
A 72-year-old man with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, but no other known
urologic disorders, presented for bone scintigraphy as part of his initial
tumor staging. After the administration of 0.925 GBq of
technetium-99mlabeled methylenediphosphonate, scintigrams of the
skeleton (Figs. 2A and
2B) were obtained and revealed
no osseous metastases. However, note was made of a prominent right renal
collecting system with bilateral dilated and tortuous ureters. Furthermore,
the urinary bladder was elevated from the pelvic floor and had a narrowed
neck, causing an appearance similar to that of an inverted pear or gourd and
suggesting the diagnosis of pelvic lipomatosis. However, pelvic fluid
collections or lymphadenopathy could not be ruled out solely on the basis of
the scintigraphic findings. CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed (Figs.
2C and
2D). It showed dilated and
tortuous ureters, prominence of the perivesical and perirectal fat with
elevation of the urinary bladder from the pelvic floor, narrowing and
elongation of the bladder neck, elongation and straightening of the rectum,
but no evidence of pelvic lymphadenopathy or fluid collection. This
constellation of CT findings has been described in the literature as
pathognomonic of pelvic lipomatosis
[1]. Further imaging or biopsy
was therefore believed to be unnecessary. In light of the reported
difficulties in performing radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic
lymphadenectomy in patients with pelvic lipomatosis
[2], brachytherapy for prostate
cancer was elected. Therefore, surgical or histopathologic confirmation of the
pelvic lipomatosis was not obtained.

View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
|
Fig. 2B. 72-year-old man with pelvic lipomatosis. Scintigram of
abdomen and pelvis in anterior projection shows elongation of bladder neck,
elevation of bladder, dilated and tortuous ureters, and right
hydronephrosis.
|
|
Pelvic lipomatosis is an uncommon disorder in which nonmalignant fibrofatty
tissue proliferates in the pelvis, particularly in the perivesical and
perirectal spaces. African-American males of all ages are most commonly
affected [3]. Urinary
obstruction, deep venous thrombosis, and constipation are known complications
of this disorder [3].
Furthermore, approximately 75% of patients with pelvic lipomatosis also have
proliferative cystitis (specifically, cystitis glandularis), considered by
many to be a premalignant condition that may give rise to adenocarcinoma of
the urinary bladder [4]. Pelvic
lipomatosis has been reported to complicate prostatectomy, cystoscopy, and
other pelvic interventions due to the distortion of the urethra and bladder
neck, obliteration of the normal fascial planes, and overproliferation of
fibrous adipose tissue throughout the pelvis
[2].
We describe a patient with prostate cancer and pelvic lipomatosis that was
first detected on bone scintigraphy. Bone scans are commonly used in the
staging of prostate cancer, and pelvic lipomatosis has been shown to
complicate radical prostatectomy and other pelvic surgeries. Therefore,
radiologists, urologists, and nuclear physicians should be aware of these
findings so that appropriate surgical planning can be under-taken and the
urologic complications of this disorder monitored appropriately.
References
- Susmano DE, Dolin EH. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of
pelvic lipomatosis. Urology1979; 13:215
220[Medline]
- Parfitt HE Jr. Radical prostatectomy in the presence of pelvic
lipomatosis. J Urol1984; 131:504
506[Medline]
- Heyns CF. Pelvic lipomatosis: a review of its diagnosis and
management. J Urol1991; 146:267
273[Medline]
- Heyns CF, De Kock ML, Kirsten PH, van Velden DJ. Pelvic lipomatosis
associated with cystitis glandularis and adenocarcinoma of the bladder.
J Urol 1991;145:364
366[Medline]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?