AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Honegger, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Honegger, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.-M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 183:831-832
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Breast Imaging

Tattoo Pigment Mimicking Axillary Lymph Node Calcifications on Mammography

Molly M. Honegger1, Stephen M. Hesseltine2, Joshua D. Gross1, Cory Singer1 and Jean-Marc Cohen3

1 Department of Radiology–Breast Imaging, Beth Israel Medical Center, Phillips Ambulatory Care Center, New York, NY 10003.
2 Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, First Ave. at 16th St., New York, NY 1003.
3 Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Phillips Ambulatory Care Center, New York, NY 10003.

Received October 28, 2003; accepted after revision December 23, 2003.

Address correspondence to S. M. Hesseltine.

The isolated finding of abnormal lymph nodes on screening mammography raises multiple differential diagnostic possibilities; among the most worrisome are the sources of malignancy, typically metastatic disease from occult breast cancers. Because in many cases, no reliable way exists to distinguish benign and malignant lymph nodes on mammography, fine-needle aspiration or biopsy may be needed for further evaluation [1].

We present a patient with foci of calcification density in an axillary lymph node detected on screening mammography that mimicked true calcification but proved at pathology to be caused by tattoo pigment.

Case Report

A 35-year-old woman presented for baseline screening mammography. She reported that her mother had been diagnosed with breast carcinoma at 55 years old. The patient was taking no medications besides oral contraceptive pills. She had extensive tattooing on both shoulders and arms and on her back that was placed more than 7 years earlier; the pigments used were predominately black, blue, red, and some yellow (Fig. 1A). At the time of examination, the patient reported no medical problems, specifically no skin or inflammatory disease. No palpable axillary lymph nodes were found.



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. —35-year-old woman with extensive tattooing on her arms and back. Photograph of patient's right arm and posterior shoulder shows extensive tattooing with black, blue, red, and yellow pigments.

 

Bilateral mammography performed in the routine projections revealed an axillary lymph node on the right containing foci of calcification density (Fig. 1B). The lymph node measured 3.0 cm in the long axis and 1.0 cm in the short axis. No other mammographic abnormality was found. Directed sonography of the right axilla revealed a prominent lymph node containing echogenic foci suggestive of calcification. Sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration of the lymph node was performed using a 22-gauge needle.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. —35-year-old woman with extensive tattooing on her arms and back. Mediolateral oblique mammogram of right breast shows axillary lymph node (arrow) containing foci of calcification density.

 

The pathologist performed preparation and evaluation of the aspirated material on site. Slides were air-dried and prepared with DIFF-QUICK stains (Dade Behring). The smears showed scattered benign lymphocytes and abundant obscuring black pigment (Fig. 1C). The aspirates were negative for malignant cells, and no calcifications were observed. We concluded that the mammographic findings represented tattoo pigment mimicking calcification in the lymph node.



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. —35-year-old woman with extensive tattooing on her arms and back. Photomicrograph of fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimen from lymph node reveals abundant black granular tattoo pigment obscuring lymphocytes. Arrows indicate some of pigment. (DIFF-QUICK [Dade Behring], x60)

 

Discussion

After a tattoo is placed, some of the pigment is phagocytosed by macrophages, which may slowly migrate to regional lymph nodes via the lymphatic system [2]. If tattoo pigment is present in sufficient quantity in axillary lymph nodes, it may mimic calcification on mammography.

An additional factor determining whether intranodal pigment will mimic calcification is the composition of the particular pigments in the tattoo. Most tattoo pigments are created by mixing various metallic ions, commonly including aluminum, titanium, and iron, but the composition of pigments varies widely. At least 30 different pigments are commercially available, and tattoo artists may mix them to obtain new shades. Furthermore, the composition is variable even among different pigments of similar color [3]. This variability of composition makes it difficult to predict the radiopacity of pigment from any particular tattoo.

Although it has previously been reported [4] that most patients with upper extremity tattoos show pigment in axillary lymph nodes at autopsy, to our knowledge, a case of tattoo pigment radiographically mimicking calcification has not previously been reported. A computerized MEDLINE search for articles published during the past 37 years failed to reveal any such cases.

The differential diagnostic possibilities for calcification in axillary lymph nodes visualized on mammography include both malignant and benign sources; in the absence of mammographic findings to suggest primary breast malignancy, a benign cause is most likely. Although the most common malignant origin is metastatic disease from occult breast malignancy, metastatic disease from other primary malignancies such as ovarian carcinoma should also be considered [1, 5]. Benign causes include tuberculosis and fat necrosis [6, 7]. Gold deposits after chrysotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis and tattoo pigment in axillary lymph nodes can also mimic calcification radiographically [8].

References

  1. Walsh R, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Bently R, DeLong DM. Axillary lymph nodes: mammographic, pathologic, and clinical correlation. AJR 1997;168:33 -38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sperry K. Tattoos and tattooing. II. Gross pathology, histopathology, medical complications, and applications. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1992;13:7 -17[Medline]
  3. Timko AL, Miller CH, Johnson FB, Ross E. In vitro chemical analysis of tattoo pigments. Arch Dermatol2001; 137:143 -147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hellerich U. Tattoo pigment in regional lymph nodes: an identifying marker [in German]. Arch Kriminol1992; 190:163 -170[Medline]
  5. Singer C, Blankstein E, Koenigsberg T, Mercado C, Pile-Spellman E, Smith SJ. Mammographic appearance of axillary lymph node calcification in patients with metastatic ovarian carcinoma. AJR2001; 176:1437 -1440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Oh KK, Kim JH, Kook SH. Imaging of tuberculous disease involving the breast. Eur Radiol1998; 8:1475 -1480[Medline]
  7. Hooley R, Lee C, Tocino I, Horowitz N, Carter D. Calcifications in axillary lymph nodes caused by fat necrosis. AJR1996; 167:627 -628[Free Full Text]
  8. Bruwer A, Nelson GW, Spark RP. Punctate intranodal gold deposits simulating microcalcifications on mammograms. Radiology1987; 163:87 -88[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Honegger, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Honegger, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.-M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS