AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unsinn, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freund, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unsinn, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freund, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2004; 183:1285-1291
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pictorial Essay

Spectrum of Imaging Findings After Intestinal, Liver-Intestinal, or Multivisceral Transplantation: Part 2, Posttransplantation Complications

Karin M. Unsinn1,2, Alfred Koenigsrainer3, Michael Rieger2, Benedikt V. Czermak2, Helmut Ellemunter1, Raimund Margreiter3, Werner R. Jaschke2 and Martin C. Freund2

1 Department of Pediatrics, Leopold-Franzens University, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck A-6020, Austria.
2 Department of Radiology, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria.
3 Department of General Surgery and Transplantation Surgery, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria.

Received December 27, 2003; accepted after revision March 9, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to K. M. Unsinn.


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Imaging Techniques
Imaged Abnormalities
Intestinal Graft Complications...
Vascular Graft Complications
Other Transplantation-Associated...
References
 
Transplantation of the small bowel, either as isolated intestinal or combined liver-intestinal or as multivisceral transplantation, has emerged as a potential alternative to total parenteral nutrition in patients with irreversible chronic intestinal failure. Compared with other solid organ transplantations, intestinal transplantation is hampered by the presence of a large number of immunocompetent donor lymphocytes in gut-associated lymphoid tissue and mesenteric nodes as well as bacterial contamination, all of which increase the risk for transplant rejection and infection. In the past decade, patient and intestinal graft survival rates have improved consistently thanks to refined surgical techniques, introduction of better immunosuppressive regimens including tacrolimus, and better antimicrobial therapy of opportunistic infections. These advances decreased technical and immunologic failure rates as well as the infection rate. Today transplantation centers report a 1-year patient and graft survival rate of 81% and 63%, respectively [1]. However, these rates compare less favorably with 1-year survival rates associated with solid organs transplantations of the heart, liver, kidney, and pancreas, which have 1-year patient and graft survival rates that approach or exceed 90% [1].

Knowledge of the transplantation procedure and knowledge of postoperative imaging anatomy of the intestinal graft are basic requirements for radiologists. Graft survival, among other factors, corresponds to early diagnosis and therapy for specific graft-related complications including leakage of enteric anastomosis, abdominal abscess, peritonitis, thrombosis of graft vessels, hematoma, and posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. This pictorial essay uses various imaging techniques to show the imaging spectrum of diseases after isolated intestinal, combined liver-intestinal, or multivisceral transplantation.


Imaging Techniques
Top
Introduction
Imaging Techniques
Imaged Abnormalities
Intestinal Graft Complications...
Vascular Graft Complications
Other Transplantation-Associated...
References
 
Various imaging techniques are routinely used to detect early or late posttransplantation complications. During the initial period of intestinal transplantation in the early 1990s, gastrointestinal studies with barium or water-soluble contrast material were performed to evaluate the integrity of the intestinal graft—for example, upper gastrointestinal and small-bowel series, enteroclysis, and contrast enema [2, 3]. A Foley catheter blocked within the isolated intestinal loop after its introduction through the temporary ileostomy facilitates a retrograde contrast enema examination.

Today, gastrointestinal contrast studies are performed only occasionally to detect complications of the enteric anastomosis or to evaluate gastrointestinal motility. Because of the accumulated knowledge of the clinical pattern of complications, cross-sectional imaging studies are currently used to detect abnormalities of the vessels, intestinal wall, and abdominal cavity [4, 5]. The use of sonography and color-coded sonography to image the vascular system, entire intestinal graft, and abdominal cavity is hampered by intraluminal intestinal gas [5], but postoperative motility of the intestinal graft can be sufficiently evaluated on sonography as a result of its real-time display. Contrast-enhanced helical CT is the primary imaging technique for complete evaluation of the vascular and enteric anastomoses, vessels, intestinal graft, and abdominal cavity [6]. MRI performed without and with IV contrast material application may also be useful in evaluating the intestinal graft, but evaluation of the enteric anastomosis on MRI is difficult.

Sometimes patients have coexistent impaired renal function before and after intestinal transplantation; renal function determines the selection of the appropriate cross-sectional imaging technique. For the preservation of renal function, contrast-enhanced MRI and unenhanced CT are the preferred examinations. Catheter angiography is used to confirm vascular complications while permitting immediate endovascular therapy [6]. Other imaging-guided interventions are used to percutaneously treat localized fluid collections, such as seromas, hematomas, and abscesses.

Imaging techniques are not used to detect transplant rejection or graft-versus-host disease. Acute rejection is diagnosed by endoscopy and mucosal biopsies from the donor stomach, duodenum, or distal ileum via the ileostomy. Graft-versus-host disease manifests most commonly as skin lesions or mucosal lesions in the recipient's residual gastrointestinal tract; both sites are best amenable for visual or endoscopic inspection and biopsies.


Imaged Abnormalities
Top
Introduction
Imaging Techniques
Imaged Abnormalities
Intestinal Graft Complications...
Vascular Graft Complications
Other Transplantation-Associated...
References
 
Organ-specific complications after combined liver-intestinal and multivisceral transplantation concern mainly the intestinal graft and therefore resemble complications after isolated intestinal transplantation. These complications rarely involve the hepatic or pancreatic graft because of the lack of operative manipulation of the hepatobiliary and portal venous system.

The main complications that are observed after intestinal transplantation are revealed by imaging techniques: intestinal graft complications including infection, vascular complications, and other transplantation-associated complications.


Intestinal Graft Complications Including Infection
Top
Introduction
Imaging Techniques
Imaged Abnormalities
Intestinal Graft Complications...
Vascular Graft Complications
Other Transplantation-Associated...
References
 
Typical graft complications include graft dysmotility, dehiscence, stricture of the enteric anastomosis, and abdominal infections. Intestinal graft dysmotility occurs frequently during the early postoperative period and can be observed directly by real-time sonography or gastrointestinal studies; it is also suspected on abdominal radiographs and CT scans by the appearance of a gasless abdomen or increased numbers of air-fluid levels and luminal dilatation (Fig. 1C). Anastomotic complications manifest either as dehiscence or stricture and can involve any anastomosis encountered in intestinal transplantation procedures.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C. 41-year-old woman after multivisceral transplantation necessitated by Gardner's syndrome and intraabdominal desmoid tumor. Eight months after operation, clinical findings were suggestive of intestinal obstruction. Helical CT scan obtained without IV but with oral contrast material shows dilated nonthickened loops of intestinal graft (asterisks) and air-fluid level, which is consistent with intestinal dysmotility.

 

For the correct interpretation of an imaging study, the radiologist must be familiar with the presence, location, and type of the various enteroanastomoses including end-to-end, end-to-side, and side-to-side reconstruction of intestinal tract continuity. Gastrointestinal contrast studies are performed with water-soluble contrast material when an anastomotic dehiscence is suspected. Typically, leakage of contrast material is observed either contained within or with free communication to the abdominal cavity (Fig. 2). An anastomotic stenosis presents as a luminal narrowing on gastrointestinal contrast studies and may exhibit prestenotic dilatation and dysmotility (Fig. 1D).



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. 59-year-old man with short-bowel syndrome who underwent upper gastrointestinal examination with water-soluble contrast material 17 days after intestinal transplantation using side-to-end jejunojejunal anastomosis. Image shows contained contrast leakage (open arrow) of recipient jejunal stump with staple line (solid arrow). Donor jejunum (solid arrowheads), recipient duodenum (asterisk), and recipient jejunum (open arrowheads) are also visible.

 


View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D. 41-year-old woman after multivisceral transplantation necessitated by Gardner's syndrome and intraabdominal desmoid tumor. Thirty-four months after operation, clinical findings were suggestive of intestinal obstruction. Radiograph obtained during enema with water-soluble contrast material displays concentric high-grade stenosis of ileorectal end-to-side anastomosis (arrow). Air-filled recipient rectal stump (open arrowheads), contrast-filled distal rectum (asterisk), and donor ileum (solid arrowheads) are depicted.

 

Abdominal infection is a frequent complication after intestinal transplantation and manifests as abscess (Figs. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F), peritonitis, or fistula formation. The typical findings for an intraabdominal abscess include a localized fluid collection with or without gas formation, air-fluid level, and contrast-enhancing abscess membrane (Fig. 4A). Imaging-guided biopsy is required for definite diagnosis and for differentiation between abscess and seroma or hematoma. An abscess can also occur in intraabdominal parenchymal organs; especially the liver is prone for abscess formation because of its filter function of portal venous drainage from the intestinal graft (Fig. 4B). The diagnosis of localized or generalized peritonitis is challenging, even on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Imaging findings include edematous infiltration of the mesenteric fat, increased contrast enhancement of the intestinal wall, and involved mesenterium (Fig. 5). Fistula formation results from an abdominal infection with communication to the skin. Sinus tract formation involves the retroperitoneum including the psoas muscle.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A. 3-year-old girl after intestinal transplantation necessitated by short-bowel syndrome (A-D), graft failure (B-D), and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (E and F). Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained 26 months after initial intestinal transplantation shows unspecific focal wall thickening of intestinal graft and reduced contrast enhancement (arrows) compared with nonthickened regular contrast-enhanced intestinal loops (arrowheads), which is consistent with focal intestinal ischemia. Ascites (asterisks) is depicted.

 


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B. 3-year-old girl after intestinal transplantation necessitated by short-bowel syndrome (A-D), graft failure (B-D), and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (E and F). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 3 years after operation displays complete acute thrombotic occlusion of portal vein (arrow) and nonenhancement of spleen (asterisk), indicating infarction. Gastric tube (arrowhead) is also visible.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3C. 3-year-old girl after intestinal transplantation necessitated by short-bowel syndrome (A-D), graft failure (B-D), and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (E and F). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 3 years after operation also shows thin-walled pancreatic pseudocyst (solid arrowheads) and focal ductal dilatation of pancreatic body (single arrow). Ascites (black asterisk), splenic infarct (white asterisk), and unspecific focal gastric wall thickening (double arrows) are also depicted. Open arrowhead = surgical clip.

 


View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3D. 3-year-old girl after intestinal transplantation necessitated by short-bowel syndrome (A-D), graft failure (B-D), and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (E and F). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 3 years after operation shows contrast enhancement of donor superior mesenteric artery (black arrow) but nonenhancement of graft arteries and intestinal wall (solid arrowheads), indicating chronic vascular occlusion. Note additional intraabdominal abscess (open arrowheads) draining via cutaneous fistula (between white arrows).

 


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3E. 3-year-old girl after intestinal transplantation necessitated by short-bowel syndrome (A-D), graft failure (B-D), and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (E and F). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 3 years after initial intestinal transplantation with graft failure and 8 weeks after subsequent multivisceral transplantation with normal graft function shows acute thrombosis of inferior vena cava (single arrow) at level of renal veins. Normal enhancement and appearance of intestinal graft (black asterisks) as well as hyperdense prosthetic mesh inlay (double arrows) for abdominal wall repair are noted. The following donor anatomic structures are shown: celiac trunk (single solid arrowhead), duodenum (white asterisk), pancreas (double open arrowheads), superior mesenteric artery (double solid arrowheads), and superior mesenteric vein (single open arrowhead).

 


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3F. 3-year-old girl after intestinal transplantation necessitated by short-bowel syndrome (A-D), graft failure (B-D), and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (E and F). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 3 years after initial intestinal transplantation with graft failure and 8 weeks after subsequent multivisceral transplantation with normal graft function displays dissection membrane (arrow) in abdominal aorta. Asterisks = intestinal graft loops.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A. 39-year-old woman after intestinal transplantation necessitated by Gardner's syndrome with intraabdominal desmoid tumor (A) and graft failure and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (B and C). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 2 months after initial intestinal transplantation displays multiple intraabdominal abscesses (asterisks) with air-fluid level and contrast-enhancing abscess membrane. Mesenteric lymphadenopathy (open arrowhead), partly thickened wall of intestinal graft (solid arrowhead), and recipient descending colon (double arrows) are depicted.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B. 39-year-old woman after intestinal transplantation necessitated by Gardner's syndrome with intraabdominal desmoid tumor (A) and graft failure and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (B and C). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 2 months after retransplantation that used multivisceral graft displays multiple intrahepatic focal hypodensities (arrows), which is consistent with nocardial abscesses. Also, note fluid-filled stomach (asterisk) and small intraabdominal abscess (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5. Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 6 weeks after intestinal transplantation in 39-year-old man with short-bowel syndrome who presented with acute sepsis syndrome. Image shows large ventral abdominal wall defect (between arrows) due to dehiscence and subsequent operative widening of median laparotomy, intraabdominal abscess (asterisks) with air bubbles (white arrowheads), and cutaneous drainage (arrows). Also seen are intestinal graft enlargement due to edematous infiltration, engorgement of mesenteric vessels, and increased contrast enhancement of intestinal wall (black arrowheads), all of which are consistent with surgically proven peritonitis.

 

Contrast-enhanced CT sometimes shows an unspecific diffuse thickening of the intestinal wall and mucosal folds early after transplantation that is presumably due to edema related to organ procurement and interruption of draining lymphatic vessels combined with an un-specific enlargement of the donor's mesenteric lymph nodes (Fig. 6B). CT can also detect an unspecific focal wall thickening of the small bowel but cannot delineate the underlying cause (Fig. 3A). Determining the cause requires additional clinical evaluation or short-term imaging evaluation and exclusion of rejection or opportunistic infection.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B. 67-year-old man after multivisceral transplantation necessitated by liver cirrhosis, intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic thrombotic occlusion of portomesenteric venous system, and clinical evidence of infection. Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained 4 weeks after operation displays unspecific enlargement of mesenteric lymph nodes (arrows) of intestinal graft. Ascites (asterisks) and calcification of iliac artery (arrowhead) are also visible.

 


Vascular Graft Complications
Top
Introduction
Imaging Techniques
Imaged Abnormalities
Intestinal Graft Complications...
Vascular Graft Complications
Other Transplantation-Associated...
References
 
The most serious vascular complication is arterial and venous graft thrombosis and can result in intestinal graft necrosis that necessitates graft enterectomy. Typically, contrast-enhanced CT displays either an intraluminal filling defect or the complete occlusion of the involved artery and nonenhancement of the intestinal wall, indicating graft necrosis (Fig. 3D). Sometimes an intraluminal membrane can be observed on imaging (Fig. 3F); this finding is suggestive of arterial dissection.

In patients with venous thrombosis, contrast-enhanced CT shows an intraluminal filling defect of the involved vein. Segmental venous thrombosis of the intestinal graft may result in intestinal pneumatosis (Fig. 4C). Thrombotic occlusion of the portal vein is followed by portal hypertension, venous congestion syndrome, and splenic infarction (Fig. 3B). Hematomas can also be detected by various imaging techniques (Fig. 1A). This finding either results from clotting disorders or indicates a localized vascular abnormality, including pseudoaneurysm (Fig. 1A) or vascular anastomotic dehiscence.



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4C. 39-year-old woman after intestinal transplantation necessitated by Gardner's syndrome with intraabdominal desmoid tumor (A) and graft failure and subsequent retransplantation utilizing multivisceral graft (B and C). Contrast-enhanced MDCT scan obtained 3 months after retransplantation that used multivisceral graft shows nonenhancement of intestinal graft (lower white arrows) except proximal jejunum (black arrow), focal intramural pneumatosis (white arrowhead), and free intraabdominal air bubble (black arrowhead) due to arterial thrombosis with ischemia and perforation. Localized fluid (white asterisk) with cutaneous fistula (between upper white arrows) is also depicted.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A. 41-year-old woman after multivisceral transplantation necessitated by Gardner's syndrome and intraabdominal desmoid tumor. Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained 10 days after operation because laboratory results provided evidence of acute hemorrhage displays mesenteric pseudoaneurysm (solid black arrowhead) with localized contrast extravasation (open arrowhead) and mesenteric hematoma (black asterisk). Intestinal graft lumen (white asterisks), mesenteric arteries and veins of intestinal graft (arrow), and postoperative changes in abdominal wall (between white arrowheads) are also shown.

 


Other Transplantation-Associated Complications
Top
Introduction
Imaging Techniques
Imaged Abnormalities
Intestinal Graft Complications...
Vascular Graft Complications
Other Transplantation-Associated...
References
 
Varying degrees of fluid collection are observed after intestinal transplantation including lymphocele (Fig. 1B) and seroma. Ascites is often located between the intestinal graft loops. In most patients, these fluid collections regress in size without treatment, but sometimes percutaneous diagnostic aspiration or therapeutic drainage is necessary. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder is a serious but rare complication of isolated intestinal, multivisceral, and combined liver-intestinal transplantation that manifests often as involvement of the intestinal or parenchymal organ graft (Figs. 7A, 7B) or infrequently as involvement of the recipient's remaining native gastrointestinal tract or as extraallograft lymphadenopathy [7]. Complications after combined liver-intestinal and multivisceral transplantation rarely involve extraintestinal graft organs but may include fatty liver degeneration (Fig. 7A), pancreatitis (Fig. 6A), pancreatic pseudocyst (Fig. 3C), and thrombosis of the inferior vena cava (Fig. 3E).



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B. 41-year-old woman after multivisceral transplantation necessitated by Gardner's syndrome and intraabdominal desmoid tumor. Six weeks after operation, intestinal graft function was normal. Helical CT scan obtained after administration of oral and IV contrast material shows large loculated fluid collection (white asterisk) with displacement of intestinal graft loops (black asterisks). Subsequent imaging-guided drainage revealed lymphocele. Postoperative dressing of ileostomy (arrows) is also depicted.

 


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7A. 5-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome 4 months after intestinal transplantation who presented with newly developed ascites. Arrowhead = gastric tube. Unenhanced MDCT scan shows fatty liver degeneration (asterisk) and focal hyperdensity (double arrows) in left liver lobe.

 


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7B. 5-year-old girl with short-bowel syndrome 4 months after intestinal transplantation who presented with newly developed ascites. Arrowhead = gastric tube. MDCT scan obtained after contrast enhancement reveals additional focal intrahepatic hypodensities (single arrows), which represent pathologically proven multifocal posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Contrast-enhancing inferior vena cava (arrowhead) is also shown. Double arrows = hyperdensity.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A. 67-year-old man after multivisceral transplantation necessitated by liver cirrhosis, intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic thrombotic occlusion of portomesenteric venous system, and clinical evidence of infection. Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained 2 weeks after operation shows enlargement of pancreatic head with reduced contrast enhancement (white arrow), which is consistent with edematous pancreatitis. Ascites (black asterisks) and periportal lymphedema (black arrows) are also revealed. Arrowhead = gastric tube, white asterisk = stomach.

 


References
Top
Introduction
Imaging Techniques
Imaged Abnormalities
Intestinal Graft Complications...
Vascular Graft Complications
Other Transplantation-Associated...
References
 

  1. Port FK. Organ donation and transplantation trends in the United States, 2001. Am J Transplant 2003;3[suppl 4]:7-12; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Web site. 2002 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report. Available at: www.ustransplant.org. Accessed December 20, 2003
  2. Bach DB, Hurlbut JJ, Romano WM, et al. Human orthotopic small intestine transplantation: radio logic assessment. Radiology1991; 180:37 -41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Campbell WL, Abu-Elmagd K, Federle MP, et al. Contrast examination of the small bowel in patients with small-bowel transplants: findings in 16 patients. AJR1993; 161:969 -974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bach DB, Levin MF, Vellet AD, et al. CT findings in patients with small-bowel transplants. AJR1992; 159:311 -315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Campbell WL, Abu-Elmagd K, Furukawa H, Todo S. Intestinal and multivisceral transplanta tion. Radiol Clin North Am1995; 33:595 -614[Medline]
  6. Lappas JC. Imaging of the postsurgical small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am2003; 41:305 -326[Medline]
  7. Reyes J, Green M, Bueno J, et al. Epstein-Barr virus associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after intestinal transplantation. Transplant Proc1996; 28:2768 -2769[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unsinn, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freund, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unsinn, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freund, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS