AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazziotti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blandino, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazziotti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blandino, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2005; 185:432-435
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Case Report

MR Cholangiopancreatography Diagnosis of Juxtapapillary Duodenal Diverticulum Simulating a Cystic Lesion of the Pancreas: Usefulness of an Oral Negative Contrast Agent

Silvio Mazziotti1, Chiara Costa2, Giorgio Ascenti1, Michele Gaeta1, Alessia Pandolfo1 and Alfredo Blandino1

1 Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Messina, via Consolare Valeria, Gazzi, Messina, Italy 98100.
2 Department of Social Medicine, Occupational Medicine Section, University of Messina, Gazzi, Messina, Italy.

Received June 7, 2004; accepted after revision September 22, 2004.

 
Address correspondence to S. Mazziotti (smazziotti{at}unime.it).


Introduction
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 
Duodenal diverticulum is a herniation of the mucosa and muscularis mucosae through the intestinal wall. In 90% of cases it is asymptomatic and is detected incidentally during radiologic or endoscopic investigation of the upper gastrointestinal tract for unrelated diseases [13]. However, in about 10% of cases, patients with duodenal diverticula undergo cross-sectional imaging techniques such as CT or MRI, owing to the onset of biliopancreatic disease symptoms [4].

Duodenal diverticula are usually easily recognized on CT or MRI when completely filled with gas or a combination of fluid and gas [2, 4, 5]. However, it has been recently reported that if its content is purely fluid, the radiologist interpreting CT or MR images can potentially misinterpret a duodenal diverticulum as a cystic tumor of the pancreas [6].

We present two patients with initial MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings suggestive of cystic pancreatic lesion. The prompt oral administration of a superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent allowed in all cases the correct diagnosis of duodenal diverticulum in subsequent MRCP images.


Case Reports
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 
Case 1
A 58-year-old woman working as a farmer for more than 3 decades underwent routine clinical examination and blood analyses for periodic medical surveillance at the Occupational Medicine ward of our institution. She complained of frequent dyspepsia associated with elevated liver-function tests.

Gray-scale sonography of the abdomen revealed a mild dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) and extrinsic compression of its distal tract by a round hypoanechoic lesion localized in the cephalic region of the pancreas, suggestive of cystic neoplasm of the pancreatic head. This suspicion was enhanced by the chronic, long-term occupational exposure of the subject to organochlorine pesticides [7]. The patient was thus transferred to a surgical ward to complete the diagnostic course and proceed to appropriate treatment.

To better define these findings, the patient underwent MRCP. MRI was executed on a 1.5-T superconducting system (Magnetom Vision, Siemens) with a phased-array body coil. Two standard MR cholangiographic techniques were applied, the single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences. The following imaging parameters were used for the thick-slab RARE sequence: TR/effective TE, infinite/1,100; flip angle, 150°; echo spacing, 10.2 msec; echo-train length, 240; slab thickness, 50 mm; acquisition time, 7 sec. The following parameters were used for the multislice HASTE sequence: TR (considered as time between two excitations)/effective TE 8.20/66; flip angle, 140–180°; echo-train length, 128; slab thickness, 4 mm; number of slices, 13; acquisition time, 13 sec. Fat suppression was used only with thick-slab RARE sequences to reduce fat signal during acquisition.

With the RARE sequence, we performed six scans focused on the CBD, rotated by 30° with respect to each other and beginning from the coronal plane. A HASTE sequence was applied twice in the axial and coronal planes with the use of a gap-and-fill technique. Images were obtained in an interleaved fashion to reduce "cross-talk" artifacts. All images were obtained during one breath-hold.

MRCP confirmed dilatation of the CBD and revealed extrinsic compression of its distal portion by a 15-mm cystic process adjacent to the uncinate process and the second portion of the duodenum, hyperintense on both thick-slab RARE and HASTE sequences (Figs. 1A and 1B). To allow differential diagnosis between cystic pancreatic neoplasm and duodenal diverticulum, 400 mL of a superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent (ferumoxsil, Lumirem; Guerbet) was promptly administered orally to the patient. MRCP images performed immediately after oral contrast administration suppressed the fluid signal in the duodenum and showed signal voiding of the lesion due to filling of the diverticulum with a negative contrast agent, thus allowing exclusion of the cystic tumor of the pancreatic head (Figs. 1C and 1D).



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A 58-year-old woman with CBD dilatation and cystic process in region of pancreatic head detected on abdominal sonography. Precontrast axial (A) HASTE MR image and oblique coronal RARE (B) MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) show 20-mm cystic process (asterisk) in region of uncinate process, causing common bile duct dilatation (c).

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B 58-year-old woman with CBD dilatation and cystic process in region of pancreatic head detected on abdominal sonography. Precontrast axial (A) HASTE MR image and oblique coronal RARE (B) MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) show 20-mm cystic process (asterisk) in region of uncinate process, causing common bile duct dilatation (c).

 


View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C 58-year-old woman with CBD dilatation and cystic process in region of pancreatic head detected on abdominal sonography. Postcontrast axial (C) HASTE MR image and RARE (D) MRCP show filling of lesion with negative contrast agent (arrows), suggesting diagnosis of duodenal diverticulum.

 


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D 58-year-old woman with CBD dilatation and cystic process in region of pancreatic head detected on abdominal sonography. Postcontrast axial (C) HASTE MR image and RARE (D) MRCP show filling of lesion with negative contrast agent (arrows), suggesting diagnosis of duodenal diverticulum.

 



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E 58-year-old woman with CBD dilatation and cystic process in region of pancreatic head detected on abdominal sonography. Spot radiograph from upper gastrointestinal barium series confirms presence of juxtapapillary diverticulum (asterisk).

 



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A 57-year-old man scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Precontrast coronal MR cholangiogram (A) shows choledocolitiasis with mild dilatation of common bile duct (CBD); 15-mm cystic process is also visible at level of pancreatic head (asterisk). On both RARE (B) and HASTE (C) postcontrast images, filling of diverticulum with oral contrast agent is clearly detectable. Filling of diverticulum (asterisk) determines mild compression and dislocation of adjacent CBD and Wirsung (arrows).

 



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B 57-year-old man scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Precontrast coronal MR cholangiogram (A) shows choledocolitiasis with mild dilatation of common bile duct (CBD); 15-mm cystic process is also visible at level of pancreatic head (asterisk). On both RARE (B) and HASTE (C) postcontrast images, filling of diverticulum with oral contrast agent is clearly detectable. Filling of diverticulum (asterisk) determines mild compression and dislocation of adjacent CBD and Wirsung (arrows).

 



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C 57-year-old man scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Precontrast coronal MR cholangiogram (A) shows choledocolitiasis with mild dilatation of common bile duct (CBD); 15-mm cystic process is also visible at level of pancreatic head (asterisk). On both RARE (B) and HASTE (C) postcontrast images, filling of diverticulum with oral contrast agent is clearly detectable. Filling of diverticulum (asterisk) determines mild compression and dislocation of adjacent CBD and Wirsung (arrows).

 
Thereafter, the upper gastrointestinal barium examination definitively confirmed the presence of a juxtapapillary diverticulum located at the medial wall of the second portion of the duodenum (Fig. 1E).

Case 2
A 57-year-old man scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent MRCP with the same equipment and procedure described for the previous case. Precontrast images showed choledocolitiasis and consequent mild dilatation of the CBD. At the level of the pancreatic head, strictly adjacent to the main pancreatic duct and CBD, a 15-mm cystic process was visible (Fig. 2A).

MRCP images acquired immediately after oral administration of the negative contrast agent showed the elimination of the bright signal intensity of the lesion, allowing exclusion of a cystic neoplasm of the pancreatic head (Figs. 2B and 2C).


Discussion
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 
Duodenal diverticula are acquired outpouchings of the mucosa and muscularis mucosae; 90% of them are on the medial aspect of the duodenum, where penetrating vessels cause potential weak spots in the bowel wall. The incidence of duodenal diverticula increases with age, and they are slightly more common in women than in men [3].

Although duodenal diverticula are a very common anomaly (incidentally discovered in 14.5% of barium examinations of the upper gastrointestinal tract), serious complications resulting from their presence are rare. The clinical presentation is typically characterized by nonspecific abdominal symptoms [13, 5].

The majority of duodenal diverticula are discovered incidentally on upper gastrointestinal studies or on endoscopic examination and are not recognized on cross-sectional imaging because of their small size [3, 5, 8]. Juxtapapillary diverticula arise within a radius of 2–3 cm from the papilla of Vater. Patients with a juxtapapillary diverticulum commonly undergo cross-sectional imaging techniques (CT or MRI) if they have biliopancreatic disease symptoms [4].

The diverticulum is usually well depicted on CT or MRI if it is filled with fluid and air and located in the characteristic periampullary region [2, 4, 5]. However, the radiologist may find it difficult to distinguish duodenal diverticula on CT or MR if their content is purely fluid, as recently described by Macari et al. [6] in a report of seven patients with duodenal diverticula in whom initial CT or MRI findings were suggestive of a cystic pancreatic mass. In fact, differential diagnosis of a cystic lesion in the region of the head of the pancreas includes cystic pancreatic neoplasm, pseudocyst, and duodenal diverticula; in these cases, careful scrutiny of images for evidence of small amounts of gas or air–fluid levels should be made, especially on MRI. The authors conclude that if diagnosis is in doubt, follow-up imaging or an upper gastrointestinal barium examination should be considered to confirm the presence of a duodenal diverticulum [6].

In our cases, MRCP performed before oral contrast administration showed a hyperintense cystic lesion in the region of the pancreatic head. In one patient, the lesion caused extrinsic compression of the lower portion of the CBD with consequent upstream mild extra-hepatic biliary dilatation. The prompt oral administration of a negative contrast agent directly allowed us to clearly show in all subjects the presence of a juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum; the diagnosis was further confirmed in the first patient by the subsequently performed barium study, considered the technique of choice for the imaging of diverticula.

MRCP is a noninvasive imaging technique that has proved accurate in the diagnosis of biliary obstruction. Single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences allow quick and high-quality imaging of the biliary system.

In the presence of duodenal diverticulum completely filled with fluid, the oral administration of a superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent allows an immediate diagnosis, without the need for follow-up imaging or upper gastrointestinal barium examination to exclude the presence of a pancreatic cystic process.

A limitation of our approach is that in many centers, routine MRCP is not monitored by a radiologist. Consequently, our technique of administering a negative oral contrast agent could require the patient to return for an additional examination. However, as reported in the literature [911], oral administration of a negative contrast agent can improve the overall quality of all abdominal MR hydrographic techniques by suppressing interference from intestinal fluid.

In our opinion, the prompt oral administration of a superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agent could be routinely performed in the same session by the technician when MRCP precontrast images show superimposition of hyperintense bowel-loop fluids.


References
Top
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
References
 

  1. Whitcomb JG. Duodenal diverticulum: a clinical evaluation. Arch Surg 1964;88 : 275–278
  2. Jaryaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Movson JS, Dupuy DE, Wallach MT. CT of the duodenum: an overlooked segment gets its due. RadioGraphics 2001;21 : 147–160
  3. Leivonen MK, Halttunen JAA, Kivilaakso EO. Duodenal diverticulum at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, analysis of 123 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 1996;43 : 961–966[Medline]
  4. Cem Balci N, Akinci A, Akun E, Urlich Klor H. Juxtapapillary diverticulum. Findings on CT and MRI. Clin Imag2003; 27:82 –88[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Stone EE, Brant WE, Smith GB. Computed tomography of the duodenal diverticula. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989;13 : 61–63[Medline]
  6. Macari M, Lazarus D, Israel G, Megibow A. Duodenal diverticula mimicking cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: CT and MR imaging findings in seven patients. AJR 2003;180 : 195–199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Clary T, Ritz B. Pancreatic cancer mortality and organochlorine pesticide exposure in California, 1989–1996. Am J Ind Med 2003; 43:306 –313[Medline]
  8. De Rai P, Castoldi L, Tiberio G. Intraluminal duodenal diverticulum causing acute pancreatitis: CT scan and review of the literature. Dig Surg 2000; 17:288 –292[Medline]
  9. Lecesne R, Drouillard J, Cisse R, Schiratti M. Contribution of Abdoscan in MRI cholangio-pancreatography and MRI urography. J Radiol 1998; 79:573 –575[Medline]
  10. Blandino A, Gaeta M, Mazziotti S, Settineri N, Pandolfo I. Use of oral superparamagnetic contrast media in cholangiopancreatography with TSE single-shot magnetic resonance. Radiol Med1998; 96:87 –91
  11. Petersein J, Reisinger W, Mutze S, Hamm B. Value of negative oral contrast media in MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Rofo 2000; 172:55 –60[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazziotti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blandino, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazziotti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Blandino, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS