AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Natori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.04.1868
AJR 2006; 186:S357-S365
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Cardiovascular Function in Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Normal Values by Age, Sex, and Ethnicity

Shunsuke Natori1, Shenghan Lai2, J. Paul Finn3, Antoinette S. Gomes3, W. Gregory Hundley4, Michael Jerosch-Herold5, Gregory Pearson6, Shantanu Sinha3, Andrew Arai7, Joao A. C. Lima8 and David A. Bluemke8

1 Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
2 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
3 Department of Radiology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
4 Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
5 Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
6 Department of Radiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY.
7 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
8 Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287.

Received December 8, 2004; accepted after revision March 14, 2005.

 
Supported by contracts N01-HC-95159 through N01-HC-95165 and N01-HC-95168 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Address correspondence to D. A. Bluemke (dbluemke{at}jhmi.edu).


Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
OBJECTIVE. MRI provides accurate and high-resolution measurements of cardiac anatomy and function. The purpose of this study was to describe the imaging protocol and normal values of left ventricular (LV) function and mass in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eight hundred participants (400 men, 400 women) in four age strata (45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84 years) were chosen at random. Participants with the following known cardiovascular risk factors were excluded: current smoker, systolic blood pressure > 140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg, fasting glucose > 110 mg/dL, total cholesterol > 240 mg/dL, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 40 mg/dL. Cardiac MR images were analyzed using MASS software (version 4.2). Mean values, SDs, and correlation coefficients in relationship to patient age were calculated.

RESULTS. There were significant differences in LV volumes and mass between men and women. LV volumes were inversely associated with age (p < 0.05) for both sexes except for the LV end-systolic volume index. For men, LV mass was inversely associated with age (slope = -0.72 g/year, p = 0.0021), but LV mass index was not associated with age (slope = -0.179 g/m2/year, p = 0.075). For women, LV mass (slope = -0.15 g/year, p = 0.30) and LV mass index (slope = 0.0044 g/m2/year, p = 0.95) were not associated with age. LV mass was the largest in the African-American group (men, 181.6 ± 35.8 [SD] g; women, 128.8 ± 28.1 g) and was smallest in the Asian-American group (men, 129.1 ± 20.0 g; women, 89.4 ± 13.3 g).

CONCLUSION. The normal LV differs in volume and mass between sexes and among certain ethnic groups. When indexed by body surface area, LV mass was independent of age for both sexes. Studies that assess cardiovascular risk factors in relationship to cardiac function and structure need to account for these normal variations in the population.

Keywords: atherosclerosis • cardiac function • cardiac imaging • ejection fraction • heart • left ventricle • left ventricle mass • MRI


Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Assessing the mass and volumes of the left ventricle (LV) is important in determining diagnosis, management, and prognosis of patients with heart disease [112]. Fundamental to the use of parameters such as LV ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, or LV mass is a reliable definition of normal LV parameters. Transthoracic echocardiography is used most widely to measure cardiac function and volume because of its availability, anatomic and prognostic validation, and lack of ionizing radiation [1315]. Furthermore, when cardiac chambers contract in a uniform and symmetric pattern, a close correlation is found between echocardiographic and angiographic volume measurements [16, 17]. Limitations of echocardiography include difficulty in assessing the apex and right ventricle. In addition, assumptions regarding the geometry of the LV (as a prolate ellipsoid) are used to estimate ventricular volumes and mass.

MRI acquires tomographic 2D or 3D images of the entire heart. Volumetric assessment of the LV is independent of geometric assumptions, noninvasive, and free of exposure to contrast agents or ionizing radiation. MRI is considered superior to other imaging techniques because of its capability for high-resolution measurements of anatomy and function of the LV. Cardiac MRI was implemented in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of MESA was to study the characteristics of subclinical cardiovascular disease and risk factors that predict progression to clinically overt cardiovascular disease and that predict progression of subclinical disease itself in an ethnically diverse population [18]. Participants included 6,814 asymptomatic men and women who ranged in age from 45 to 84 years and were free of clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline. Approximately 40% of the cohort were white Americans, 30% African-Americans, 20% Hispanics, and 10% Asian-Americans, predominantly of Chinese descent, recruited from six United States communities [18].

The purposes of this article are to describe the protocol for cardiac MRI for MESA and provide a set of normal reference values of LV mass and volumes with respect to sex, ethnicity, and age.


Subjects and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Study Population
Cardiac MR examinations for 400 men and 400 women from the MESA cohort were randomly selected after excluding participants with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (current smokers, systolic blood pressure > 140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg, fasting blood glucose > 110 mg/dL, total cholesterol > 240 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol < 40 mg/dL). For women, 170 participants were white, 80 were African-American, 83 were Hispanic, and 67 were Asian-American. For men, 168 participants were white, 98 were African-American, 78 were Hispanic, and 56 were Asian-American.

MRI
MRI was performed at the six MESA field centers using 1.5-T magnets. The following are the MR scanners that were used at each field center: Wake Forest University, Signa CV/I (GE Healthcare); Columbia University, Signa LX (GE Healthcare); Johns Hopkins University, Signa CV/I; University of Minnesota, Vision or Sonata (Siemens Medical Solutions); Northwestern University, Sonata; and University of California at Los Angeles, Signa LX or Vision. All imaging examinations were performed with a four-element phased-array surface coil placed anteriorly and posteriorly, ECG gating, and brachial artery blood pressure monitoring.

MRI Protocol
Table 1 shows the outline of the MESA MRI protocol. Cardiac MR examinations consisted of short- and long-axis cine images, phase contrast images of the aorta, and black blood aorta images. The protocol was accomplished within 30–45 min. All images were acquired during short breath-holding (12–15 sec) at resting lung volume.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1: MRI Protocol for Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

 

First, four midline ECG-gated sagittal scout images were acquired with a fast gradient-echo sequence (series 1). These images were used to confirm correct positioning of the phased-array surface coil. Second, the same sequence was used to acquire three axial scout views (series 2); these images were acquired beginning 2 cm above the diaphragm. Next, a pseudovertical long-axis scout image (series 3) was obtained using the largest LV image from series 2. This slice extended through the middle of the mitral valve plane and the LV apex. Four-chamber long-axis cine images (series 4) were next acquired using a cine ECG-gated fast gradient-echo pulse sequence. The imaging plane for the four-chamber view was prescribed along points intersecting the middle of the mitral valve plane and the LV apex. Short-axis cine images (series 5) were acquired from the end-diastolic image of the four-chamber acquisition, by prescribing 10–12 slices perpendicular to a line from the middle of the mitral valve plane to the cardiac apex. A two-chamber vertical long-axis cine sequence (series 6) was obtained by prescribing a single slice along a line extending from the LV apex to the middle of the mitral valve plane as viewed on the four-chamber view (series 4). The image prescription was designed to minimize variation among the MR field centers. Cine images were obtained with a temporal resolution of approximately 50 msec or less.

Additional pulse sequences were acquired, and those results will be reported separately. In brief, axial cine phase contrast images (series 7) were obtained through the ascending and descending aorta at the level of the right pulmonary artery. A blood-suppressed (black blood) double inversion recovery fast spin-echo image (series 8) was obtained in the sagittal oblique plane along a line intersecting the middle of the ascending and descending aorta as viewed on series 7. Series 9 consisted of blood-suppressed double inversion recovery fast spin-echo images prescribed at the level of the top of the pulmonary artery as seen on series 8 in the axial plane, vertical plane, and at 45° between the axial and vertical planes.

Image Analysis
Cardiac MR images were transmitted using DICOM transfer protocol to the central cardiac MR review center in Baltimore, MD, at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The cardiac MR images were transferred to a workstation (UNIX, Sun Microsystems) for analysis. Image data were analyzed using MASS software ([version 4.2] Medis). Images were magnified to 250%. Image contrast was set to 60; image brightness was set to 60; window width and level were set using the Auto function in MASS, which sets the maximum and minimum pixel values in the displayed image to values of 255 and 0, respectively.

Image analysts were trained technologists who received lectures in cardiac anatomy and function. Technologists were trained on a set of 40 training cases that were reviewed by an experienced cardiac MR physician. The training period examinations were accepted if LV function parameters were within 10% of the physician-determined values. The endocardial and epicardial borders were traced semiautomatically at both end-diastole and end-systole on short-axis cine images and were then corrected manually at the base of the heart. Corrections to other images were allowed if visual inspection revealed obviously incorrect borders. The papillary muscles were included in the LV end-diastolic volume and LV end-systolic volume and excluded from the LV mass. All image contours were checked by a cardiac MR physician after contouring was finished by the technologist.

LV end-diastolic volume and LV end-systolic volume were calculated using Simpson's rule (the summation of areas on each separate slice multiplied by the sum of slice thickness and image gap). LV mass was determined by the sum of the myocardial area (the difference between endocardial and epicardial contour) times slice thickness plus image gap in the end-diastolic phase multiplied by the specific gravity of myocardium (1.05 g/mL). LV stroke volume was calculated as the difference between LV end-diastolic volume and LV end-systolic volume. LVEF was calculated as LV stroke volume divided by LV end-diastolic volume multiplied by 100. Cardiac output was calculated as LV stroke volume times heart rate. Body surface area (BSA) was calculated as follows:

Formula
where ht is height and wt is weight.

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as follows:

Formula

Indexed parameters (e.g., LV mass index) were calculated by dividing each parameter (e.g., LV mass) by BSA.

Inter- and Intraobserver Variability
Technologist interobserver variability was measured in 79 MR readings selected at random (3% of the entire cohort) by comparing the original MR volumes and mass readings with results from a second review performed between 3 and 6 months later. Intraobserver variability was assessed in 75 MR readings performed in the same manner. Reviewers were blinded to the results of the initial reading at the time of the second and third readings.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Analysis of variance was used as appropriate for statistical testing between groups. A multiple comparison procedure, Dunnett's t test (two-sided), was used to compare the differences among ethnic groups. A oneway analysis of variance with linear contrasts (test for trend) was used for LV function parameters. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient estimates, and variability was assessed using technical error of measurement percentage of the mean (TEM%).


Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Sex Differences for LV Volumes and Mass
Table 2 shows LV parameters for men and women, respectively. Significant differences between the sexes were seen for all global measures of cardiac structure and function. The mean LV end-diastolic volume was 142.2 ± 34.0 mL in men and 109.2 ± 22.5 mL in women (p < 0.0001). The mean LV mass was 163.8 ± 35.8 g in men and 113.6 ± 24.2 g in women (p < 0.0001). When normalized by BSA (Table 3) and by BMI (Table 4), these differences between men and women remained statistically significant for all parameters except LV stroke volume and cardiac output. When indexed by height (Table 5), these differences between sexes remained significant except for cardiac output. When indexed by weight (Table 6), sex differences for all LV parameters remained statistically significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2: Left Ventricular (LV) Volumes and Mass for 400 Men and 400 Women

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3: Left Ventricular (LV) Function Indexed by Body Surface Area for 400 Men and 400 Women

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4: Left Ventricular (LV) Function Indexed by Body Mass Index (BMI) for 400 Men and 400 Women

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 5: Left Ventricular (LV) Function Indexed by Height (ht) for 400 Men and 400 Women

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 6: Left Ventricular (LV) Function Indexed by Weight (wt) for 400 Men and 400 Women

 

Age-Related Differences for LV Volumes and Mass
Figures 1A, 1B, and 1C shows the relationship between LV functional parameters and age for men. LV mass showed an inverse association with age (slope = -0.72 g/year, p = 0.0021), but LV mass index (Fig. 1A) was not associated with age (slope = -0.18 g/m2/year, p = 0.075). LV end-diastolic volume (slope = -0.81 mL/year, p = 0.0003), LV end-systolic volume (slope = -0.41 mL/year, p = 0.0014), and LV volume indexes (Figs. 1B and 1C) were inversely associated with age for men.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —Scatterplot and linear regression lines show cardiac parameter compared with age for men. Scatterplot and linear regression line (slope = -0.179 g/m2/year, p = 0.075) between LVMI (left ventricular mass indexed by body surface area) and age for men.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —Scatterplot and linear regression lines show cardiac parameter compared with age for men. Scatterplot and linear regression line (slope = -0.246 mL/m2/year, p = 0.011) between LVEDVI (left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed by body surface area) and age for men.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —Scatterplot and linear regression lines show cardiac parameter compared with age for men. Scatterplot and linear regression line (slope = -0.157 mL/m2/year, p = 0.007) between LVESVI (left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed by body surface area) and age for men.

 
Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C shows the relationship between LV functional parameters and age for women. LV mass (slope = -0.15 g/year, p = 0.30) and LV mass index (slope = 0.0044 g/m2/year, p = 0.95) (Fig. 2A) were not associated with age. LV end-diastolic volume (slope = -0.54 mL/year, p ≤ 0.0001), LV end-systolic volume (slope = -0.13 mL/year, p = 0.031), and LV end-diastolic volume index (Fig. 2B) were inversely associated with age for women, but LV end-systolic index showed only a small inverse association with age (slope = -0.054 mL m2/year, p = 0.080) (Fig. 2C).


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —Scatterplot and linear regression lines show cardiac parameter compared with age for women. Scatterplot and linear regression line (slope = 0.0044 g/m2/year, p = 0.95) between LVMI (left ventricular mass indexed by body surface area) and age for women.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —Scatterplot and linear regression lines show cardiac parameter compared with age for women. Scatterplot and linear regression line (slope = -0.236 mL/m2/year, p = 0.0003) between LVEDVI (left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed by body surface area) and age for women.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —Scatterplot and linear regression lines show cardiac parameter compared with age for women. Scatterplot and linear regression line (slope = -0.054 mL/m2/year, p = 0.080) between LVESVI (left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed by body surface area) and age for women.

 
Ethnic Differences for LV Volumes and Mass
Tables 7 and 8 show differences among the ethnic groups for the participants' characteristics and global measures of cardiac volume and function.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 7: Left Ventricular (LV) Function by Ethnicity for 400 Men

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 8: Left Ventricular (LV) Function by Ethnicity for 400 Women

 

For men (Table 7), there were no significant differences for most LV parameters between white Americans, African-Americans, and Hispanics. However, LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, LV stroke volume, and LV mass were significantly different between Asians and other ethnic groups (all p < 0.05). Differences in LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, and LV mass remained significant between Asians and other ethnic groups after normalization by BSA (LV end-diastolic volume index, LV end-systolic volume index, and LV mass index).

For women (Table 8), there were no differences in most parameters between white Americans, African-Americans, and Hispanics. However, LV end-diastolic volume, LV stroke volume, and LV mass were significantly different between Asians and other ethnic groups (all p < 0.05). LV mass remained significantly different between Asians and other ethnic groups after normalization by BSA (LV mass index).

Inter- and Intraobserver Variability
Tables 9 and 10 show the results of observer variability assessment. The interobserver TEM% for LV end-diastolic mass, end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume were 6.0%, 4.4%, and 12.8%, respectively, and intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.98, 0.98 and 0.94, respectively. Intraobserver values are shown in Table 10.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 9: Interobserver Variability for Left Ventricular (LV) Mass and Volumes Measurements

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 10: Intraobserver Variability for Left Ventricular (LV) Mass and Volumes Measurements

 


Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The major findings of the current investigation are as follows: first, LV volumes and mass were significantly greater for men than for women; second, LV mass indexed by BSA did not significantly decrease with age for either sex; third, LV volumes and volume indexes tended to decrease slightly with age for both sexes; and, fourth, the Asian-American participants in general had lower values for LV mass and volumes than other ethnic groups even when adjusted for BSA.

MESA Study
The MESA study was initiated in July 2000 by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to further understanding of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases [18]. A population-based sample of 6,814 asymptomatic men and women who ranged in age from 45 to 84 years and were free of clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline were evaluated. In addition to cardiac MRI, baseline measurements included measurement of coronary calcium using CT; measurement of flow-mediated brachial artery endothelial vasodilatation, carotid intimal–medial wall thickness, and distensibility of the carotid arteries using sonography; measurement of peripheral vascular disease using ankle and brachial blood pressures; ECG; and assessments of microalbuminuria, standard cardiovascular disease risk factors, sociodemographic factors, life habits, and psychosocial factors. Blood samples have been obtained for putative biochemical risk factors. Thus, MRI is one part of a rich imaging "phenotype" that will be correlated with serologic and imaging risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

The calculation of LV mass and volumes using MRI does not require assumptions to be made concerning an analytic model of LV shape. Unlike echocardiography and cineangiocardiography, cine MRI does not rely on geometric assumptions or calculations based on incomplete sampling of the cardiac volumes [1921]. Furthermore, MRI is noninvasive and is free of exposure to contrast agents or ionizing radiation. These advantages over other imaging techniques have led to more widespread use of MRI for the assessment of cardiac function.

LV Parameters and Sex
Knowledge of the global structure and function of the normal LV underlies current assessment of patients with cardiovascular disease. In this study, normal volumes for the LV determined using MRI (Table 2) are similar to those of previous studies [20, 22, 23]. LV mass, however, in this study is smaller than in other studies. The reason for this may include exclusion of participants with cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking [24], hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipemia. In addition, this study included individuals of different ethnicity and this could account for lower LV mass values. Asian-Americans, in particular, show lower mean values for LV mass than the other ethnic groups in the MESA cohort.

In men, LV volumes and indexed volumes showed a small negative association with age (Figs. 1B and 1C). A similar pattern was seen for women (Figs. 2B and 2C), although LV end-systolic volume index showed only a trend toward negative association with age. For LV mass and LV mass index, there were also somewhat similar patterns for men and women; LV mass index showed no significant relationship to age (Figs. 1A and 2A). The absolute LV mass, however, was negatively associated with age for men and was not related to age for women.

Gerstenblith et al. [25] found age-associated LV hypertrophy using M-mode echocardiography. Shub et al. [26] reported an age-associated increase in LV mass in women, with no change in men. On autopsy findings, Olivetti et al. [27] described progressive LV myocyte loss, cellular hypertrophy, and multinucleation with decreased LV mass in men but not in women, similar to the results of this study. Also in agreement with the current study, Hees et al. [23] reported LV mass on MRI did not vary with age in women but that it decreased significantly in men. However, adjusting for body size (using BSA or LV mass index) reduced this age dependence in men in our study.

LV Parameters and Ethnicity
This study provides normal LV mass and volumes for white Americans, African-Americans, Hispanics, and Asian-Americans. There are no previous reports, to our knowledge, about LV parameters for different ethnic groups described on MRI. The most notable finding is that Asian-Americans have lower LV mass and volumes compared with other ethnic groups. LV volumes and mass in African-Americans were largest for men, whereas LV volumes and LV mass were smallest in Asian-American men. For women, African-Americans had similar LV volumes compared with white Americans and Hispanics, whereas Asian-Americans had smaller LV volumes and LV mass. These findings were significant after normalization by BSA. Zabalgoitia et al. [28] reported that LV mass indexed to BSA of patients with mild to moderate high blood pressure was similar among white Americans, African-Americans, and Hispanics using echocardiography. Asian-Americans were not included in that study.

Limitations
There are several limitations in the current investigation. Risk factor definition and cutoff values were based on prior studies that may have used different characteristics than were used for participants in MESA. The reason for LV mass and volume differences between ethnic groups may be related to factors such as socioeconomic status or selection bias that has not been evaluated. We expect to be able to analyze these factors further in subsequent analyses involving cardiovascular risk factors in the MESA study.

The results we report in this study were obtained using a fast gradient-echo MR pulse sequence. More recently, the steady-state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence became available. Early studies report slight differences in cardiac volume, mass, and EF obtained with fast gradient-echo versus SSFP images [2932].

In conclusion, this article describes the relationship between sex and age and global measures of cardiac structure and function as defined by MRI in the MESA cohort for a population without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Differences in cardiac structure and function among ethnic groups were present and need to be assessed in future studies in relationship to cardiovascular risk factors.


Acknowledgments
 
We thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at www.mesa-nhlbi.org.


References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Alonso DR, Scheidt S, Post M, Killip T. Pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock: quantification of myocardial necrosis, clinical, pathologic and electrocardiographic correlations. Circulation1973; 48:588 -596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sasayama S, Ross J Jr, Franklin D, Bloor CM, Bishop S, Dilley RB. Adaptations of the left ventricle to chronic pressure overload. Circ Res 1976; 38:172 -178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Trenouth RS, Phelps NC, Neill WA. Determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy and oxygen supply in chronic aortic valve disease. Circulation 1976;53 : 644-650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Perloff JK. Development and regression of increased ventricular mass. Am J Cardiol 1982;50 : 605-611[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Maron BJ, Kragel AH, Roberts WC. Sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with normal left ventricular mass. Br Heart J 1990; 63:308 -310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, et al. Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement: cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 24:59 -65[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Denolle T, Chatellier G, Julien J, Battaglia C, Luo P, Plouin PF. Left ventricular mass and geometry before and after etiologic treatment in renovascular hypertension, aldosterone-producing adenoma, and pheochromocytoma. Am J Hypertens 1993;6 : 907-913[Medline]
  8. Benedict CR, Francis GS, Shelton B, et al. Effect of long-term enalapril therapy on neurohormones in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. SOLVD investigators. Am J Cardiol1995; 75:1151 -1157[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Greenberg B, Quinones MA, Koilpillai C, et al. Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiac structure and function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: results of the SOLVD echocardiography substudy. Circulation 1995;91 : 2573-2581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PW, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation1987; 76:44 -51[Medline]
  11. Dunn FG, Pringle SD. Sudden cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmias and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens 1993; 11:1003 -1010[Medline]
  12. Levine TB, Levine AB, Keteyian SJ, Narins B, Lesch M. Reverse remodeling in heart failure with intensification of vasodilator therapy. Clin Cardiol 1997;20 : 697-702[Medline]
  13. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977;55 : 613-618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schiller NB, Skioldebrand CG, Schiller EJ, et al. Canine left ventricular mass estimation by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1983;68 : 210-216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wahr DW, Wang YS, Schiller NB. Left ventricular volumes determined by two-dimensional echocardiography in a normal adult population. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 1:863 -868[Abstract]
  16. Asanoi H, Kameyama T, Ishizaka S, Miyagi K, Sasayama S. Ventriculoarterial coupling during exercise in normal human subjects. Int J Cardiol 1992;36 : 177-186[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Wallerson DC, Ganau A, Roman MJ, Devereux RB. Measurement of cardiac output by M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography: application to patients with hypertension. Eur Heart J1990; 11[suppl I]:67 -78
  18. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, et al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol2002; 156:871 -881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Gould RG, Cassidy MM, Higgins CB. Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1987;163 : 697-702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, et al. Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174 : 763-768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, et al. Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle. Am Heart J 1990; 119:1367 -1373[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SS, Graham TP Jr. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999; 1:7 -21[Medline]
  23. Hees PS, Fleg JL, Lakatta EG, Shapiro EP. Left ventricular remodeling with age in normal men versus women: novel insights using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90:1231 -1236[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gidding SS, Xie X, Liu K, Manolio T, Flack JM, Gardin JM. Cardiac function in smokers and nonsmokers: the CARDIA study. The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. J Am Coll Cardiol1995; 26:211 -216[Abstract]
  25. Gerstenblith G, Frederiksen J, Yin FC, Fortuin NJ, Lakatta EG, Weisfeldt ML. Echocardiographic assessment of a normal adult aging population. Circulation 1977;56 : 273-278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Shub C, Klein AL, Zachariah PK, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Determination of left ventricular mass by echocardiography in a normal population: effect of age and sex in addition to body size. Mayo Clin Proc1994; 69:205 -211[Medline]
  27. Olivetti G, Giordano G, Corradi D, et al. Gender differences and aging: effects on the human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol1995; 26:1068 -1079[Abstract]
  28. Zabalgoitia M, Ur Rahman SN, Haley WE, et al. Impact of ethnicity on left ventricular mass and relative wall thickness in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1998;81 : 412-417[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Plein S, Bloomer TN, Ridgway JP, Jones TR, Bainbridge GJ, Sivananthan MU. Steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: comparison with segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:230 -236[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Li W, Stern JS, Mai VM, Pierchala LN, Edelman RR, Prasad PV. MR assessment of left ventricular function: quantitative comparison of fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) with fast gradient echo cine technique. J Magn Reson Imaging2002; 16:559 -564[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Myerson SG, Bellenger NG, Pennell DJ. Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hypertension 2002;39 : 750-755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ichikawa Y, Sakuma H, Kitagawa K, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using fast steady-state cine MR imaging: comparison with left ventricular angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003; 5:333 -342[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Bahrami, D. A. Bluemke, R. Kronmal, A. G. Bertoni, D. M. Lloyd-Jones, E. Shahar, M. Szklo, and J. A.C. Lima
Novel metabolic risk factors for incident heart failure and their relationship with obesity: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 6, 2008; 51(18): 1775 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Cheung, D. A. Bluemke, R. Klein, A. R. Sharrett, F.M. A. Islam, M. F. Cotch, B. E.K. Klein, M. H. Criqui, and T. Y. Wong
Retinal Arteriolar Narrowing and Left Ventricular Remodeling: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 3, 2007; 50(1): 48 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Nasir, M. Tsai, B. D. Rosen, V. Fernandes, D. A. Bluemke, A. R. Folsom, and J. A.C. Lima
Elevated Homocysteine Is Associated With Reduced Regional Left Ventricular Function: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): 180 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Heckbert, W. Post, G. D.N. Pearson, D. K. Arnett, A. S. Gomes, M. Jerosch-Herold, W. G. Hundley, J. A. Lima, and D. A. Bluemke
Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Relation to Left Ventricular Mass, Volume, and Systolic Function by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 5, 2006; 48(11): 2285 - 2292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Cardiac Imaging 2006
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S337 - S340.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Natori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bluemke, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS