AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cloran, F.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cloran, F.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, K. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.2141
AJR 2007; 188:S18-S20
© American Roentgen Ray Society

AJR Teaching File: Diffuse Osteosclerosis with Hepatosplenomegaly

Francis Cloran1 and Kevin P. Banks2

1 Department of Radiology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Lackland, TX.
2 Department of Radiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, MCHE-DR, 3851 Roger Brooke Dr., Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234.

Received December 21, 2005; accepted after revision May 8, 2006.

 
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air Force, or the Department of Defense.

Address correspondence to K. P. Banks (kevin.banks{at}amedd.army.mil).

Keywords: bone • diffuse sclerosis • musculoskeletal system • myelofibrosis


Case History
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
A 59-year-old man presents with left flank pain.


Figure 1
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —59-year-old man with left flank pain. Frontal radiograph of abdomen shows diffuse osteosclerosis and concurrent severe splenomegaly and hepatomegaly.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —59-year-old man with left flank pain. Subsequent contrast-enhanced CT scan of abdomen verifies presence of increased bone density secondary to organized trabecular thickening and deposition along endosteal cortex.

 

Radiologic Description
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
Frontal radiography of the abdomen (Fig. 1A) shows diffuse osteosclerosis and concurrent severe splenomegaly and hepatomegaly. Subsequent contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen (Fig. 1B) verifies the presence of increased bone density secondary to organized trabecular thickening and deposition along the endosteal cortex. The patient went on to MRI, and an axial T1-weighted MR image (Fig. 1C) through the abdomen shows decreased signal intensity of the normally bright fatty bone marrow. A coronal T2-weighted MR image (Fig. 1D) through the spine reveals homogeneously decreased signal intensity of the marrow.


Figure 3
View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —59-year-old man with left flank pain. Axial T1-weighted MR image through abdomen shows decreased signal intensity of normally bright fatty bone marrow.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —59-year-old man with left flank pain. Coronal T2-weighted MR image through spine reveals homogeneously decreased signal intensity of marrow.

 

Differential Diagnosis
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
The differential diagnosis for increased bone density is metabolic disorders (such as hyperthyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, renal osteodystrophy), fluorosis, myelofibrosis, mastocytosis, lymphoma, osteopetrosis, osteoblastic metastases, Paget's disease, and sickle cell anemia.

The differential diagnosis for low marrow signal intensity on MRI is fluorosis, myelofibrosis, mastocytosis, lymphoma, osteopetrosis, osteoblastic metastasis, and Paget's disease.


Diagnosis
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
The diagnosis is myelofibrosis.


Commentary
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
Myelofibrosis is considered one of the chronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMPDs), which is a group of diseases in which too many of certain types of cells are made in the bone marrow. Other entities in this class of diseases include essential thrombocytopenia and polycythemia vera; and chronic neutrophilic, eosinophilic, and myeloid leukemia. These entities are similar in that all CMPDs display a hyperplastic bone marrow, hematopoiesis independent of physiologic stimuli, a phase of increased circulating blood cell concentrations, a tendency to develop marrow fibrosis, and a tendency to terminate in acute leukemia [1]. Whereas polycythemia vera is due to an idiopathic excess of RBCs and essential thrombocytopenia is due to overproduction of platelets by an unknown cause, myelofibrosis is characterized by the abnormal maturation of RBCs and granulocytes (a type of WBC).

Myelofibrosis affects approximately one in 100,000 people; the median age at diagnosis is 60 years [2]. The biology of myelofibrosis is incompletely understood, and the transforming event is yet to be identified. The granulocytes, platelets, and RBCs are monoclonally derived, whereas the fibroblasts are polyclonally derived. There are no strong candidates for tumor suppressor genes or protooncogenes responsible for the development of this hemopathy [3]. Clinical presentations are heterogeneous; the disease may be asymptomatic in 25% of patients on presentation. Common initial signs and symptoms include fatigue, weight loss, easy bruising and bleeding, fever, night sweats, and splenomegaly. Gout and renal colic due to hyperuricemia from high cell turnover may also be observed.

Laboratory findings in myelofibrosis include anemia and variable changes in the neutrophil and platelet counts. The peripheral blood smear classically reveals nucleated blood cells, reticulocytes, and teardrop-shaped RBCs. Abnormally large platelets may also be observed. Bone marrow biopsy frequently reveals fibrosis with variable degrees of marrow hyperplasia [4].

The radiographic hallmark of myelofibrosis is osteosclerosis (increased bone density), most commonly found in the axial skeleton and the proximal aspects of the long bones (humerus and femur) [4]. Osteosclerosis involves the replacement of the normal marrow cavity with fibrous tissue with no trabecular or cortical disorganization. This process is in contrast to myelosclerosis, in which small spicules of bone obliterate the marrow space. The differential diagnosis of osteosclerosis is diverse and includes hematologic disorders (i.e., myelofibrosis, sickle cell anemia, polycythemia, multiple myeloma, leukemia, mastocytosis), osteoblastic metastases (prostate carcinoma, breast carcinoma, gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma, carcinoid tumors, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder), and metabolic disorders (renal osteodystrophy, primary hyperparathyroidism, familial hypophosphatemic osteomalacia, hypervitaminosis D, fluorosis, hypoparathyroidism, pseudohypoparathyroidism).

The lack of architectural distortion seen with the osteosclerosis of myelofibrosis—particularly the osteoblastic metastatic processes and multiple myeloma that predominantly present with irregular foci of abnormal bone density in the axial skeleton and proximal long bones—is one of the essential imaging features aiding in the differentiation of this disease from many of the other disorders in the differential diagnosis. Similarly, the increased bone density seen in sickle cell disease is due to bone infarcts, which have an irregular appearance, as do the bone changes of osteopetrosis and Paget's disease, which are in contrast to the changes characterizing myelofibrosis.

Although the metabolic disorders can show diffuse osteosclerosis on radiographic examination as well, they do not result in decreased marrow signal intensity on MRI. This is because of the marrow or cancellous bone compartment alterations found in hemopathies such as myelofibrosis, in which loss of high T1 fatty marrow signal and decreased T2 signal are associated with the marrow's abnormal hypercellularity. In contrast, metabolic bone disorders affect only the cortical and trabecular bone, leaving marrow elements unchanged and therefore having a normal MR appearance. Laboratory findings (abnormalities in serum parathyroid hormone and calcium and phosphate levels) will also aid in the diagnosis of this disorder more than roentgenographic findings will [5].

The consequences of extramedullary hematopoiesis commonly include splenomegaly and hepatomegaly and, less commonly, lymphadenopathy. The severity of these findings can be readily assessed on CT, which can also provide an assessment of osteosclerosis. The presence of splenomegaly or hepatomegaly greatly reduces the differential diagnosis because it argues against metabolic disorders with calcium disturbances and sickle cell anemia (autoinfarction of spleen), and such a finding is generally not seen in the neoplastic disorders that can lead to osteosclerosis. Mastocytosis may mimic myelofibrosis radiographically, but typically skeletal surveys will reveal osteopenia, and the peripheral blood smear will show eosinophilia [6].

Treatment options are limited in myelofibrosis. It may be cured by allogenic bone marrow transplantation [7]. Other forms of therapy are palliative and are used primarily to improve anemia (androgens with or without steroids, thalidomide, splenectomy, splenic radiation), to reduce symptoms related to organomegaly and hypermetabolism (chemotherapy), or to treat complications (allopurinol for treatment of hyperuricemia).

Causes of death are variable in myelofibrosis and include leukemic conversion in 5-20% and overwhelming infection, hemorrhage, cardiovascular events, thrombosis, renal failure, and hepatic failure.


Objective
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
The educational objective of this teaching article is to review the analytic approach to individuals presenting with diffusely increased bones on radiography or low T1 signal intensity of bone marrow on MRI.


Conclusion
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
Through careful examination for concurrent imaging findings and the use of the clinical history, a tailored differential diagnosis can be provided to maximize the diagnostic yield.


References
Top
Case History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 

  1. Dameshak W. Some speculations on the myeloproliferative syndromes. (editorial) Blood 1951;6 : 372-375[Medline]
  2. Dupriez B, Morel P, Demory JL, et al. Prognostic factors in agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a report on 195 cases with a new scoring system. Blood 1996; 88:1013 -1018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Clark DA, Williams WL. Myelofibrosis. In: Lee GR, Foerster J, Lukens J, et al., eds. Wintrobe's clinical hematology, 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Williams & Wilkins, 1999:2390 -2399
  4. Campbell SE, Bui-Mansfield LT, Fillman ER. Myelofibrosis. Mil Med 2005; 170:xv -xix[Medline]
  5. Vogler JB, Kim JH. Metabolic and endocrine diseases of the skeleton. In: Grainger RG, Allison D, Adam A, Dixon AK, eds. Diagnostic radiology: a textbook of medical imaging, 4th ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone, 2001:1960 -1961
  6. Parker RI, Metcalf DD. Basophils, mast cells and systemic mastocytosis. In: Hoffman R, Benz EJ, Shattil SJ, et al., eds. Hematology: basic principles and practice, 4th ed. New York, NY: Elsevier, 2005:913 -923
  7. Smith BD, Moliterno AR. Biology and management of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Curr Opin Oncol 2001;13 : 91-94[CrossRef][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cloran, F.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cloran, F.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, K. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS