AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muhm, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muhm, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.0738
AJR 2007; 188:S5-S6
© American Roentgen Ray Society

AJR Teaching File: Solitary Pulmonary Nodule with Enhancing Rim Sign

John R. Muhm1 and Catherine C. Roberts

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 13400 E Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ 85259.

Received April 30, 2005; revised August 18, 2005;

 
Address correspondence to C. C. Roberts (roberts.catherine{at}mayo.edu).

Keywords: chest • CT • lung • solitary pulmonary nodules


Clinical History
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
An 84-year-old man presents with a recent cough but does not have fever or chills. On chest radiography, a solitary pulmonary nodule is identified. Because previous chest radiographs are not available for comparison, the lesion is studied with CT.


Radiologic Description
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
An axial CT image through a solitary pulmonary nodule acquired before the administration of IV contrast material (Fig. 1A) shows homogeneous soft-tissue density. After administration of IV contrast material (Fig. 1B), the nodule rim enhances more intensely than the central portion. The center of the nodule enhanced 17 H.


Figure 1
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —84-year-old man with recent cough. (Reprinted with permission from Muhm JR, McCullough AE. The enhancing rim: a new sign of a benign pulmonary nodule. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78:1092-1096 [5]) Unenhanced CT scan through solitary pulmonary nodule shows homogeneous rounded soft-tissue mass.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —84-year-old man with recent cough. (Reprinted with permission from Muhm JR, McCullough AE. The enhancing rim: a new sign of a benign pulmonary nodule. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78:1092-1096 [5]) After administration of IV contrast material, nodule rim enhances more intensely than lower density central portion. Center of nodule (region of interest marked) enhanced 17 H.

 

Differential Diagnosis
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
The differential diagnosis includes granuloma, metastasis, bronchogenic carcinoma, and round atelectasis.


Diagnosis
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
The diagnosis in this patient is benign granuloma.


Commentary
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
Solitary pulmonary nodules are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Distinguishing benign from malignant processes with imaging can be a challenge. Contrast-enhanced CT can help characterize solitary pulmonary nodules [1-3]. After the IV administration of iodinated contrast material, enhancement of 15 H or less is a strong predictor of benignancy [4]. In a study of 111 nodules that enhanced 15 H or less, 107 (96%) were benign. Of the 245 nodules that enhanced more than 15 H, 167 (68%) were malignant [4].

Using the technique described by Swensen et al. [1], a new finding has been observed in some benign solitary pulmonary nodules. This has been termed the "enhancing rim sign" because it refers to a rim of enhancing soft tissue at the periphery of a solitary pulmonary nodule that surrounds a homogeneous lower density central portion of the nodule [5]. This sign has been seen in 16 cases of benign nodules and in no cases of malignant nodules. Some of the benign nodules that exhibited this sign had central portions that enhanced more than 15 H. Pathologically, the enhancing rim sign corresponds to an enhancing rim of fibrotic inflammatory tissue surrounding a necrotic center, which in this case was caused by a necrotizing infection.

With respect to the other items in the differential diagnosis, bronchogenic carcinoma and metastases that measure 3 cm or less in diameter usually show homogeneous enhancement. Malignancies larger than 3 cm may have inhomogeneous enhancement because of necrosis. The key differentiating factor is that the necrotic central area will not be homogeneous. The enhancing rim sign has not been seen in malignant pulmonary nodules. Round atelectasis will show prominent homogeneous enhancement of the atelectatic lung. Round atelectasis would not be expected to have a low-density center.

When an enhancing rim is seen surrounding a homogeneous lower density center on contrast-enhanced CT, a benign process should be considered, even if the central enhancement is greater than 15 H. Other features favoring a benign process include a round to oval shape and a smooth margin. Necrotizing granulomas can produce false-positive results on 18F-FDG PET [6], complicating nodule evaluation in regions endemic for granulomatous disease. If a nodule shows the enhancing rim sign but also has another indeterminant sign, such as enhancement greater than 15 H or spiculated borders, then CT should be repeated in 3-4 months instead of sending the patient immediately to PET, biopsy, or surgical resection.


Objective
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
The educational objective of this article is to review features differentiating benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on CT.


Conclusion
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 
An enhancing rim sign can be helpful in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules. CT follow-up remains necessary. This sign can be especially helpful in regions endemic for granulomatous disease because necrotizing granulomas can produce false-positive results on PET.


References
Top
Clinical History
Radiologic Description
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Commentary
Objective
Conclusion
References
 

  1. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, et al. Pulmonary nodules: CT evaluation of enhancement with iodinated contrast material. Radiology 1995;194 : 393-398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Yamashita K, Matsunobe S, Tsuda T, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodule: preliminary study of evaluation with incremental dynamic CT. Radiology 1995;194 : 399-405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: prospective findings. Radiology 1996;201 : 447-455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology 2000;214 : 73-80[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Muhm JR, McCullough AE. The enhancing rim: a new sign of a benign pulmonary nodule. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78 : 1092-1096[Medline]
  6. Knight SB, Delbeke D, Stewart JR, Sandler MP. Evaluation of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET: comparison of findings in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy. Chest1996; 109:982 -988

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Thiessen, J. M. Seely, F. R. K. Matzinger, P. Agarwal, K. L. Burns, C. J. Dennie, and R. Peterson
Necrotizing Granuloma of the Lung: Imaging Characteristics and Imaging-Guided Diagnosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1397 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. P. Ko, C. C. Roberts, W. G. Berger, and F. S. Chew
Imaging Evaluation of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: Self-Assessment Module
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3_Supplement): S1 - S4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muhm, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muhm, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS