<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Gastrointestinal Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Gastrointestinal Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/158?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/175?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/182?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1495?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1505?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1512?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1517?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1521?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/158?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Image Quality and Patient Acceptance of Four Regimens with Different Amounts of Mild Laxatives for CT Colonography]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/158?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to prospectively evaluate
image quality and patient acceptance of CT colonography (CTC) with fecal
tagging using different levels of catharsis.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Forty consecutive increased-risk patients were
randomized. Group 1 received orally 20 mg of bisacodyl, group 2 received 30 mg
of bisacodyl, group 3 received 20 mg of bisacodyl and 8.2 g of magnesium
citrate, and group 4 received 30 mg of bisacodyl and 16.4 g of magnesium
citrate. All patients used a 2-day low-fiber diet and received diatrizoate
meglumine and barium for fecal tagging. One reviewer blindly scored subjective
image quality (fecal tagging, amount of residual feces [liquid or solid],
luminal distention, and image readability) on a 5- to 6-point scale using a 2D
review technique. The mean and SD of attenuation of tagging were measured as
well as the relative SD as a measure of homogeneity. Furthermore, patient
acceptance (burden related to diarrhea, abdominal pain, flatulence, and
overall burden) was evaluated. Ordinal regression, generalized estimating
equations, and parametric and nonparametric tests were used for analysis.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Image readability was evaluated as good or excellent in all
examinations except one in group 2 (nondiagnostic) and two in group 3
(moderate). Group 2 contained more feces than group 4 (<I>p</I> = 0.04).
With regard to mean attenuation and homogeneity of tagging, no significant
differences were observed between groups. Group 4 experienced more severe
diarrhea than groups 1 and 2 and higher overall burden than groups 1 and 3
(<I>p</I> &lt; 0.042).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The mildest preparation with 20 mg of bisacodyl provided
good image quality of CTC images. Increasing the amount of laxatives did not
improve image quality or tagging characteristics but was associated with a
lower patient acceptance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jensch, S., de Vries, A. H., Pot, D., Peringa, J., Bipat, S., Florie, J., van Gelder, R. E., Stoker, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3128</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Image Quality and Patient Acceptance of Four Regimens with Different Amounts of Mild Laxatives for CT Colonography]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>167</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>158</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/168?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Performance of a Previously Validated CT Colonography Computer-Aided Detection System in a New Patient Population]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/168?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> A computer-aided detection (CAD) system with high
sensitivity in the detection of adenomatous polyps in varied CT colonography
(CTC) data sets increases the utility of CAD in the clinical setting. The
purpose of this study was to evaluate the standalone performance of an
existing CAD system with a new set of CTC data from screening patients at an
institution and geographic location different from those at which the CAD
system was trained.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> CTC data were collected from the records of
104 patients undergoing screening for colorectal neoplasia. Most of the
patients were at average risk, had CTC findings suggestive of polyps, and
underwent colonoscopy. Patients underwent cathartic bowel preparation, were
given an oral contrast agent, and underwent imaging in the prone and supine
positions. The patients had 86 adenomas confirmed at same-day optical
colonoscopy; 47 of these tumors were 10 mm in diameter or larger, and 39
measured 6&ndash;9 mm. The CTC data were analyzed with an existing CAD system
for colonography that was trained with previously acquired data. In a previous
non-polyp-enriched screening cohort, the standalone performance of the CAD
system was 93.3% (28/30) sensitivity for adenomatous polyps 10 mm or larger,
51.1% (47/92) sensitivity for adenomas 6&ndash;9 mm, and a mean false-positive
rate of 8.6 per patient. Sensitivity comparisons were made with findings in
the previous study.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The CAD system had per-polyp sensitivities of 91.5% (43/47;
95% CI, 78.7&ndash;97.2%; <I>p</I> = 1.0) for adenomas 10 mm or larger and
82.1% (32/39; 65.9&ndash;91.9%; <I>p</I> = 0.0009) for adenomas 6&ndash;9
mm. The per-patient sensitivities were 97.6% (40/41; 85.6&ndash;99.9%;
<I>p</I> = 0.6) for patients with adenomas 10 mm or larger and 82.4% (28/34;
64.8&ndash;92.6%; <I>p</I> = 0.047) for patients with adenomas 6&ndash;9 mm.
The mean and median false-positive rates were 9.6 &plusmn; 9.6 and 7.0 per
patient, respectively. Common reasons for CAD misses (false-negative findings)
were the presence of adherent contrast medium, flat adenomas, and adenomas
located on or adjacent to normal colonic folds. In a random sample, 72.5%
(29/40) of false-positive findings were attributable to folds or residual
feces.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The CAD system evaluated has a high level of performance
in the detection of adenomatous polyps with CTC data from a polyp-enriched
cohort different from that used to train the system.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Summers, R. M., Handwerker, L. R., Pickhardt, P. J., Van Uitert, R. L., Deshpande, K. K., Yeshwant, S., Yao, J., Franaszek, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3354</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Performance of a Previously Validated CT Colonography Computer-Aided Detection System in a New Patient Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/175?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Is Small-Bowel Radiography Necessary Before Double-Balloon Endoscopy?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/175?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Small-bowel radiography may be replaced by enteroscopy in
the diagnosis of small-intestine lesions. We retrospectively elucidated the
diagnostic yield of small-bowel radiography performed before double-balloon
endoscopy.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> One hundred twenty-four patients who
underwent double-balloon endoscopy during the period 2004&ndash;2006 were
classified into those with abnormal radiographic findings (<I>n</I> = 45),
normal radiographic findings (<I>n</I> = 31), and no small-bowl radiographs
(<I>n</I> = 48). The classification was based on the use of small-bowel
radiography and the diagnosis before double-balloon endoscopy. The indications
for, approaches to, and diagnostic yields of double-balloon endoscopy were
compared for the three groups. The diagnostic yield of small-bowel radiography
was considered positive when any sign of pathologic change in the small bowel
was identified. The diagnostic yield of double-balloon endoscopy was
considered positive when endoscopic or biopsy findings explained the clinical
manifestations.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The group with abnormal findings on small-bowel radiography
was younger (15&ndash;86 years) and less frequently had obscure bleeding
(8.9%) than the group with normal findings on small-bowel radiography (age,
17&ndash;84 years; frequency of obscure bleeding, 45.2%) (<I>p</I> = 0.01)
or the group without small-bowel radiographs (age, 15&ndash;91 years;
frequency of obscure bleeding, 64.6%) (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001). The positive
diagnostic yield of double-balloon endoscopy was highest in the group with
abnormal findings on small-bowel radiography (71.1%), followed by the group
with no small-bowel radiographs (45.8%) and the group with normal findings on
small-bowel radiography (35.5%) (<I>p</I> = 0.0002). Among patients who did
undergo small-bowl radiography, the accuracy of the technique was 68.4%, the
positive predictive value was 71.1%, and the negative predictive value was
64.5%. The positive diagnostic yields of small-bowel radiography and
double-balloon endoscopy were not statistically different (59.2% for
small-bowel radiography, 56.6% for double-balloon endoscopy; <I>p</I> &gt;
0.1).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The diagnostic accuracy of double-balloon endoscopy
seems to improve if the procedure is preceded by small-bowel radiography.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matsumoto, T., Esaki, M., Yada, S., Jo, Y., Moriyama, T., Iida, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Is Small-Bowel Radiography Necessary Before Double-Balloon Endoscopy?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>181</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>175</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/182?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] More than Meets the Eye: Subtle but Important CT Findings in Bouveret's Syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/182?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Gallstones are a rare cause of duodenal or gastric outlet
obstruction and therefore are not commonly suspected. Rigler's radiographic
triad of pneumobilia, bowel obstruction, and an ectopic gallstone is seen in
few of these patients. The symptoms are insidious and nonspecific, and the
diagnosis is usually made radiologically. Although CT scans are far more
sensitive, 25% of cases are still missed, often because the size of the
offending gallstone is underestimated.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Better assessment of stone size, and therefore higher
accuracy of diagnosis, could be achieved if attention is paid to more subtle
but nonetheless important signs. These include compressed air in dependent
areas of the duodenal lumen, an area of soft-tissue rather than fluid density
surrounding the calcified rim of the stone, and a faint radiolucency in or
beyond this soft-tissue area that could represent laminations of fat or air in
the stone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gan, S., Roy-Choudhury, S., Agrawal, S., Kumar, H., Pallan, A., Super, P., Richardson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3418</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] More than Meets the Eye: Subtle but Important CT Findings in Bouveret's Syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>182</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Sonography Transmission Gel as Endorectal Contrast Agent for Tumor Visualization in Rectal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study is to show the usefulness and
safety of sonography transmission gel as an endorectal contrast agent in
preoperative rectal MRI for tumor visualization in rectal cancer.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Sonography transmission gel is an effective and safe
endorectal contrast agent for rectal MRI.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, S. H., Lee, J. M., Lee, M. W., Kim, G. H., Han, J. K., Choi, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Sonography Transmission Gel as Endorectal Contrast Agent for Tumor Visualization in Rectal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>189</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1495?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Perspective on the Role of Transrectal and Transvaginal Sonography of Tumors of the Rectum and Anal Canal]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1495?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Intestinal sonography is characterized by excellent
resolution of the multiple layers of the intestinal wall and sensitive
depiction of the degree of invasion of rectal tumors. Traditional transrectal
sonography has been enhanced by the addition of transvaginal scanning for
women and by advances in transducer technology. Our purpose is to describe the
current status of sonography in the evaluation of rectal and anal tumors and
in the staging of rectal cancer.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Endorectal and transanal sonography are fast, minimally
invasive techniques that can be performed with portable equipment and yield
rapidly interpreted images. They are considered the reference standard for the
preoperative staging of rectal and anal cancers and have relatively high
accuracy in categorization of tumors and nodes in TNM staging.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berton, F., Gola, G., Wilson, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3188</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Perspective on the Role of Transrectal and Transvaginal Sonography of Tumors of the Rectum and Anal Canal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1504</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1495</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1505?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] MDCT for Differentiation of Category T1 and T2 Malignant Lesions from Benign Gastric Ulcers]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1505?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate MDCT parameters
for differentiating malignant (category T1 and T2) from benign gastric ulcers
and to evaluate the performance characteristics of these predictors with
optimal cutoff points determined in receiver operator characteristic
analysis.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> The subjects were 26 patients with gastric
cancer (11 with T1 lesions, 15 with T2 lesions) and 26 patients with benign
gastric ulcer. MDCT and virtual gastroscopic findings were analyzed according
to four qualitative criteria: ulcer shape, base, and margin and changes in
adjacent folds. The quantitative criteria ulcer size, thickness of the gastric
wall around an ulcer, thickness of the enhanced ulcer base, and enhancement
around an ulcer were measured on multiplanar reconstruction images. We
calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each quantitative criterion.
Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to identify cutoff points
yielding optimal sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gastric
cancer.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> On virtual gastroscopy, ulcer shape and margin and gastric
fold changes had sensitivities of 80.8%, 84.6%, and 90.9% and specificities of
76.9%, 73.1%, and 77.8%, respectively, in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. On
multiplanar reconstruction images, thickness of the enhanced ulcer base and
enhancement around the ulcer had sensitivities of 80.8% and 73.1% and
specificities of 100% and 100%.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> MDCT combined with virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar
reconstruction enhances the morphologic details of gastric ulcers and is a
useful way to differentiate malignant (T1 and T2) and benign gastric
ulcers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, C.-Y., Wu, D.-C., Kuo, Y.-T., Lee, C.-H., Jaw, T.-S., Kang, W.-Y., Hsu, J.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2940</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] MDCT for Differentiation of Category T1 and T2 Malignant Lesions from Benign Gastric Ulcers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1511</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1505</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1512?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Using CT Enterography to Monitor Crohn's Disease Activity: A Preliminary Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1512?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to determine whether imaging
changes of Crohn's disease at sequential CT enterography examinations
correlate with disease progression or regression.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Forty CT enterography examinations in 20
patients (12 women, eight men; mean age, 55.5 years) with known Crohn's
disease were retrospectively evaluated by a radiologist who was blinded to the
clinical history. One radiologist determined whether imaging findings of
Crohn's disease were present and, if so, whether the findings progressed,
regressed, or remained stable between examinations. CT enterography findings
were then compared with disease progression or regression based on symptoms
and clinical follow-up. Direct comparison of CT enterography and endoscopy was
also performed when available.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Disease progression or regression by CT enterography
correlated with symptoms in 16 of 20 (80%) patients. Specifically, CT
enterography and symptoms agreed in 12 patients with clinical disease
progression, two patients with clinical regression, and two with clinically
stable disease. In four of 20 (20%) patients, symptoms progressed although CT
enterography findings were negative (<I>n</I> = 2) or improved (<I>n</I> =
2). No treatment change was initiated; and at follow-up, three of four
patients were improved and the remaining patient was stable symptomatically.
Sixteen ileoscopies were attempted in 12 patients; however, four examinations
did not reach the ileum. In the remaining examinations, endoscopy correlated
with CT enterography in all cases (12/12, 100%) and with symptoms in nine of
12 (75%) cases. The weighted kappa statistic, which measures the
chance-adjusted agreement between CT enterography and symptoms, was 0.57 (95%
CI, 0.20-0.94).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> This preliminary study indicates that imaging changes
between CT enterography examinations have excellent potential for reliably
monitoring Crohn's disease progression or regression.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hara, A. K., Alam, S., Heigh, R. I., Gurudu, S. R., Hentz, J. G., Leighton, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2877</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Using CT Enterography to Monitor Crohn's Disease Activity: A Preliminary Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1516</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1512</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1517?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Hyperirritable Stomach as a Cause of Nausea and Vomiting: Clinical and Radiographic Findings]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1517?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to characterize the clinical
and radiographic features of the hyperirritable stomach and to determine if it
is associated with extraintestinal causes of nausea and vomiting in the
absence of gastric outlet obstruction, gastroparesis, or intestinal
obstruction or ileus.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The hyperirritable stomach was characterized on barium
studies in 15 patients by rapid emesis of ingested barium, a collapsed stomach
with little or no retained debris or fluid, and normal emptying of residual
barium into nondilated duodenum and proximal jejunum. Fourteen (93%) of these
15 patients had extraintestinal causes of nausea and vomiting, and 13 (93%) of
14 with clinical follow-up had marked improvement or resolution of symptoms
after treatment. Radiologists therefore should evaluate the stomach and
duodenum even after rapid emesis of ingested barium in patients with nausea
and vomiting to differentiate a hyperirritable stomach from mechanical or
functional gastrointestinal obstruction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naeger, D. M., Levine, M. S., Renjen, P., Rubesin, S. E., Laufer, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3317</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Hyperirritable Stomach as a Cause of Nausea and Vomiting: Clinical and Radiographic Findings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1520</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1517</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Colonic Pseudoobstruction: CT Findings]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this review was to define the imaging
features of colonic pseudoobstruction and to describe the pathologic
findings.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Colonic pseudoobstruction can be diagnosed on the basis
of CT findings that show extensive colonic dilatation without an obstructive
lesion at the intermediate transitional zone or adjacent to the splenic
flexure. Pathologic examination reveals that intramural ganglion damage has a
high tendency to occur in cases of chronic colonic pseudoobstruction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, J. S., Lim, J. S., Kim, H., Choi, J.-Y., Kim, M.-J., Kim, N. K., Kim, K. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3159</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Gastrointestinal Imaging] Colonic Pseudoobstruction: CT Findings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1526</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Gastrointestinal Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>