<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Genitourinary Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Genitourinary Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/3/908?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/3/W127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/387?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/396?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/416?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/423?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/243?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/3/908?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Is There an Increased Prevalence of Renal Stone Disease?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/3/908?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Parathyroid adenomas cause hypercalcemia and are culprits
in the development of renal stone disease. With serum assays available, early
detection of parathyroid tumors is possible. We performed this retrospective
review to determine whether the prevalence of nephrocalcinosis and
nephrolithiasis is still increased in patients with primary
hyperparathyroidism compared with those not affected by the disorder in view
of the early detection of parathyroid adenomas.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> We retrospectively reviewed the renal
sonograms of 271 patients with surgically proven primary hyperparathyroidism.
All patients had undergone renal imaging within 6 months before parathyroid
surgery. Our control group consisted of 500 age-matched subjects who had right
upper quadrant sonograms obtained for various reasons.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Nineteen (7.0%) of the 271 patients with primary
hyperparathyroidism had renal stones, and eight (1.6%) of the 500 subjects in
the control group had stones. Pearson's chi-square analysis showed that this
difference in prevalence is significant (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Our results showed a fourfold increased prevalence of
asymptomatic renal stone disease in patients with surgically proven primary
hyperparathyroidism compared with subjects not affected by the disorder. The
National Institutes of Health consensus conference on asymptomatic primary
hyperparathyroidism recommended that patients with renal stone disease undergo
parathyroid surgery. These patients should undergo surgery even if they have
minimal or no elevation of the total serum calcium value and no other
metabolic manifestations of hyperparathyroidism. The finding of
nephrocalcinosis or nephrolithiasis is, therefore, a significant finding in
evaluating patients for parathyroid surgery. Routine imaging of the kidneys is
necessary when primary hyperparathyroidism is documented.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suh, J. M., Cronan, J. J., Monchik, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3160</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Is There an Increased Prevalence of Renal Stone Disease?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>911</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>908</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/3/W127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] In Vitro Assessment of a 3D Segmentation Algorithm Based on the Belief Functions Theory in Calculating Renal Volumes by MRI]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/3/W127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Renal volumetry is an essential part of split renal
function assessment in MR urography. The aim of this study was to assess the
accuracy and repeatability of a 3D segmentation algorithm based on the belief
functions theory for calculating renal volumes from MR images.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The true volumes of 20 animal kidneys of
various sizes were obtained by fluid displacement. Each kidney was examined
using two different MR units. Three-dimensional proton density&ndash;weighted
acquisitions with an incremental slice thickness were performed. The MR volume
was then measured with a segmentation algorithm based on the belief functions
theory. Two independent observers performed all segmentations twice. Accuracy,
intraobserver variability, and interobserver variability were evaluated by the
Bland-Altman method. The number and type of manual corrections were recorded
as well as the entire processing time.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The mean renal volume estimated by fluid displacement was
114 mL (range, 38&ndash;224 mL). With regard to the renal volumes obtained
from assessments of adjacent axial MR images, the maximal SDs of the
difference were 2.2 mL (accuracy), 0.6 mL (intraobserver variability), and 1.8
mL (interobserver variability). Segmentation of axial slices provided better
accuracy and reproducibility than coronal slices. Overlapped coronal slices
yielded poor results because of the partial volume effect. The mean processing
time including optional manual modifications was less than 75 seconds.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The belief functions theory can be considered an
accurate and reproducible mathematic method to assess renal volume from MR
adjacent images.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivier, P.-H., Dolores, M., Gardin, I., Zhang, P., Petitjean, C., Dacher, J.-N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] In Vitro Assessment of a 3D Segmentation Algorithm Based on the Belief Functions Theory in Calculating Renal Volumes by MRI]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Frequency of Serum Creatinine Changes in the Absence of Iodinated Contrast Material: Implications for Studies of Contrast Nephrotoxicity]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Most studies of contrast-induced nephropathy lack
controls to distinguish it from nephropathy from other causes. We assessed the
frequency and magnitude of serum creatinine changes in patients not receiving
iodinated contrast material to compare with creatinine changes in publications
regarding contrast nephropathy.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> From the electronic medical records of an
academic medical center, adults with creatinine determinations on five
consecutive days who had not received contrast material during the previous 10
days were identified. The first creatinine level was compared with those on
subsequent days. We calculated the frequency with which these levels exceeded
thresholds used to identify contrast nephropathy in previous publications.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Among 32,161 patients, more than half showed a change of at
least 25% and more than two fifths, a change of at least 0.4 mg/dL. Among
patients with baseline creatinine levels of 0.6&ndash;1.2 mg/dL, increases of
at least 25%, 33%, and 50% occurred in 27%, 19%, and 11% of patients,
respectively. Increases of 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/dL occurred in 13%, 7%, and 3%
of patients. Among patients with baseline creatinine levels greater than 2.0
mg/dL, increases of at least 25%, 33%, and 50% occurred in 16%, 12%, and 7%.
Increases of 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/dL occurred in 33%, 26%, and 18%. These
increases were not different from the incidences of contrast nephropathy
previously published.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The creatinine level increases in patients who are not
receiving contrast material as often as it does in published series of
patients who are receiving contrast material. The role of contrast material in
nephropathy may have been overestimated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newhouse, J. H., Kho, D., Rao, Q. A., Starren, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3280</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Frequency of Serum Creatinine Changes in the Absence of Iodinated Contrast Material: Implications for Studies of Contrast Nephrotoxicity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>382</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Contrast Material Not Required?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> This commentary deals with the study by Newhouse and
colleagues in this issue of the <I>AJR</I> discussing the implications of a
lack of a control group in previously published studies on contrast-induced
nephropathy (CIN).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Until more rigorous studies including an appropriate
control group address the issue of CIN, our understanding of the actual risk
of CIN when administering IV contrast media is limited.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baumgarten, D. A., Ellis, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.08.1310</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Contrast Material Not Required?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>386</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/387?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Testicular Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/387?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of this article is to describe recent
developments in imaging patients with testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Most patients with testicular GCTs can now be expected
to be cured, so the focus on management moves toward identifying patients who
need more aggressive treatment and avoiding long-term complications. CT
remains central in the selection of a management strategy, although the roles
of MRI and PET continue to evolve.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sohaib, S. A., Koh, D.-M., Husband, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2758</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Testicular Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>395</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>387</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/396?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/396?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to perform a meta-analysis
to evaluate the diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the diagnosis of
urolithiasis (seven studies, 1,061 patients).</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> The medical literature from 1995 to 2007 was
searched using PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases for articles on
studies that used low-dose CT (&lt; 3 mSv dose applied for the entire CT
examination) as a diagnostic test for the detection of urolithiasis.
Prospective and retrospective studies were included if they separately
reported the rate of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and
false-negative diagnoses of urolithiasis from low-dose CT compared with the
positive and negative rates of normal-dose CT or a combination of diagnostic
tests. Two readers assessed the quality of the studies.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The pooled sensitivity and specificity of low-dose CT for
the diagnosis of urolithiasis were 0.966 (95% CI, 0.950&ndash;0.978) and 0.949
(95% CI, 0.920&ndash;0.970), respectively.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The results of this meta-analysis suggest that a
low-dose CT protocol can be used as the initial imaging technique in the
workup of patients with suspected urolithiasis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niemann, T., Kollmann, T., Bongartz, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3414</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>401</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>396</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/402?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Radiologic Anatomy of the Right Adrenal Vein: Preliminary Experience with MDCT]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/402?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to determine how frequently
the right adrenal vein could be unequivocally identified on MDCT and the
spectrum of anatomic variations seen in the right adrenal vein.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Contrast-enhanced MDCT was performed in 104
patients with thoracoabdominal vascular disease using an 8-MDCT scanner. Both
axial and multiplanar images were reviewed by two radiologists. The following
points regarding the right adrenal vein were evaluated: degree of
visualization; relationship to accessory hepatic or other veins; anatomy,
including location of the orifice in relation to the surrounding structures;
direction from the inferior vena cava; and length and diameter.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The right adrenal vein was detected in 79 (76%) of 104
patients. The right adrenal vein formed a common trunk with the accessory
hepatic vein in six (8%) of the 79 patients. The orifice was craniocaudally
located between the level of vertebrae T11 and L1. Among the 73 patients, the
right adrenal vein joined the inferior vena cava in the right posterior
quadrant in 71 patients (97%) and in the left posterior quadrant in two (3%).
The transverse direction from the inferior vena cava was posterior and
rightward in 56 patients (77%) and posterior and leftward in 17 (23%); the
vertical direction from the inferior vena cava was caudal in 65 (89%) and
cranial in eight (11%) patients. The length and diameter averaged 3.8 and 1.7
mm, respectively.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> MDCT enabled the identification of the right adrenal
vein and delineation of its anatomy, including its position and relationship
to surrounding structures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matsuura, T., Takase, K., Ota, H., Yamada, T., Sato, A., Satoh, F., Takahashi, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3338</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Radiologic Anatomy of the Right Adrenal Vein: Preliminary Experience with MDCT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>408</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>402</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/409?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Frequency, Outcome, and Appropriateness of Treatment of Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Media Reactions]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/409?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to evaluate the frequency,
outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of adults with acute allergiclike
reactions related to IV-administered nonionic iodinated contrast media.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> For IV injections of nonionic iodinated
contrast media between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2005, contrast
reaction reports and medical records of patients in whom contrast reactions
occurred were reviewed. Data collected included patient sex and age, symptoms,
reaction manifestations, treatment, and long-term sequelae. The
appropriateness and efficacy of patient management were assessed.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Allergic-type reactions occurred in 545 (0.6%) of patients
injected with nonionic iodinated contrast media: 418 (77%) reactions were
mild, 116 (21%) were moderate, and 11 (2%) were severe. Two hundred twenty-one
patients (41%) received treatment. The most commonly administered medication
was diphenhydramine (145 patients or 27%). Corticosteroids were administered
to 17 patients, nebulized albuterol to 16, and epinephrine to 15. Although 99%
of the treatments did not result in any complication, three patients may have
had short-term sequelae as a result of receiving a nonrecommended
treatment.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Patients usually do well after developing acute
allergiclike reactions to nonionic iodinated contrast media. Fortunately, in
our series, this was true even in the rare cases in which the instituted
treatment was considered to be inappropriate. Reacting patients rarely develop
serious long-term sequelae.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, C. L., Cohan, R. H., Ellis, J. H., Caoili, E. M., Wang, G., Francis, I. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3421</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Frequency, Outcome, and Appropriateness of Treatment of Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Media Reactions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>415</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>409</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/416?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Transitional Cell Neoplasm of the Upper Urinary Tract: Evaluation with MDCT]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/416?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> MDCT has become a valuable tool with high sensitivity for
detecting transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> In this article, we discuss and illustrate the spectrum
of the appearances of transitional cell neoplasm of the upper urinary tract on
16- and 64-MDCT with multiplanar reformation and 3D imaging.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kawamoto, S., Horton, K. M., Fishman, E. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3649</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Transitional Cell Neoplasm of the Upper Urinary Tract: Evaluation with MDCT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>422</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>416</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/423?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: A Review of Clinical Features and Imaging Findings]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/2/423?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Retroperitoneal fibrosis is a rare collagen vascular
disorder of unclear cause. Both benign and malignant associations have been
described, rendering differentiation of these entities of paramount importance
because sinister pathology alters the diagnosis. Thus, a high level of
diligence is required in the investigation of this condition, particularly in
patients with concomitant systemic conditions.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Familiarity with the realm of imaging manifestations of
retroperitoneal fibrosis is vital to ensure correct diagnosis and optimal
treatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cronin, C. G., Lohan, D. G., Blake, M. A., Roche, C., McCarthy, P., Murphy, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3629</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: A Review of Clinical Features and Imaging Findings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>431</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>423</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Lipid-Poor Adenomas on Unenhanced CT: Does Histogram Analysis Increase Sensitivity Compared with a Mean Attenuation Threshold?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of
CT histogram analysis for further characterization of lipid-poor adenomas on
unenhanced CT.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> One hundred thirty-two adrenal nodules were
identified in 104 patients with lung cancer who underwent PET/CT. Sixty-five
nodules were classified as lipid-rich adenomas if they had an unenhanced CT
attenuation of less than or equal to 10 H. Thirty-one masses were classified
as lipid-poor adenomas if they had an unenhanced CT attenuation greater than
10 H and stability for more than 1 year. Thirty-six masses were classified as
lung cancer metastases if they showed rapid growth in 1 year (<I>n</I> = 27)
or were biopsy-proven (<I>n</I> = 9). Histogram analysis was performed for
all lesions to provide the mean attenuation value and percentage of negative
pixels.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> All lipid-rich adenomas had more than 10% negative pixels;
51.6% of lipid-poor adenomas had more than 10% negative pixels and would have
been classified as indeterminate nodules on the basis of mean attenuation
alone. None of the metastases had more than 10% negative pixels. Using an
unenhanced CT mean attenuation threshold of less than 10 H yielded a
sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of an adenoma.
Using an unenhanced CT threshold of more than 10% negative pixels yielded a
sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of an
adenoma.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> CT histogram analysis is superior to mean CT attenuation
analysis for the evaluation of adrenal nodules and may help decrease referrals
for additional imaging or biopsy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ho, L. M., Paulson, E. K., Brady, M. J., Wong, T. Z., Schindera, S. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Lipid-Poor Adenomas on Unenhanced CT: Does Histogram Analysis Increase Sensitivity Compared with a Mean Attenuation Threshold?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>238</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Renal Doppler Indices in Sickle Cell Disease: Early Radiologic Predictors of Renovascular Changes]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to detect changes in
renovascular resistance through renal Doppler indexes in young sickle cell
disease patients with normal routine urine laboratory tests.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Renal Doppler sonography resistive index and pulsatility
index values can serve as early radiologic predictors of renovascular changes
in sickle cell disease. Thereby, these findings can guide clinicians in the
use of more intensive monitoring of laboratory values and initiating adequate
treatment at an early stage.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taori, K. B., Chaudhary, R. S., Attarde, V., Dhakate, S., Sheorain, V., Nimbalkar, P., Wasnik, P. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Renal Doppler Indices in Sickle Cell Disease: Early Radiologic Predictors of Renovascular Changes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/243?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Unenhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries with Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Dixon Method]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/243?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility
of a novel technique for fat&ndash;water separation to image the renal
arteries without using a contrast agent.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Five healthy volunteers were imaged on a 3-T clinical MR
scanner using the balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) Dixon method.
We were able to image the proximal renal arteries with high conspicuity within
a 3-minute overall scanning time. The balanced-SSFP Dixon method shows
potential for unenhanced MR angiography of the proximal renal arteries.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stafford, R. B., Sabati, M., Haakstad, M. J., Mahallati, H., Frayne, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Genitourinary Imaging] Unenhanced MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries with Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Dixon Method]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>246</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Genitourinary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>