<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology Hepatobiliary Imaging</title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Roentgenology RSS feed -- recent Hepatobiliary Imaging articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1546-3141</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Roentgenology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0361-803X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/215?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/W8?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1527?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1534?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W335?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Roentgenology</title>
<url>http://www.ajronline.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Nonhypervascular Hypoattenuating Nodules Depicted on Either Portal or Equilibrium Phase Multiphasic CT Images in the Cirrhotic Liver]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of this study was to investigate the
outcome and clinical implications of nonhypervascular hypoattenuating nodules
observed on portal or equilibrium phase CT images of cirrhotic livers.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> One hundred one cirrhotic patients
(male:female = 69:32) with hypoattenuating nodules observed on initial portal
or equilibrium phase CT images were retrospectively evaluated by follow-up CT
performed 6&ndash;66 months after the initial CT examination. Depending on the
background nodularity, patients were separated into macronodular (<I>n</I> =
33, 288 nodules) and micronodular (<I>n</I> = 68, 346 nodules) cirrhotic
groups. Each nodule was categorized as category I (enlarged) or category II
(stable). Nodule categories were correlated with the initial lesion size and
the pattern of background cirrhosis.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> The frequency of category I nodules was higher in patients
with micronodular cirrhosis (40%) than in those with macronodular cirrhosis
(27%) (<I>p</I> = 0.001). Category I nodules were significantly larger than
category II nodules in patients with micronodular cirrhosis (<I>p</I> &lt;
0.001). The doubling times of category I nodules had no statistical difference
between patients with micronodular or macronodular cirrhosis (<I>p</I> =
0.954). Of the category I nodules in patients with micronodular cirrhosis,
8.6% showed malignant changes.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> More careful attention should be paid to large nodules
in patients with micronodular cirrhosis because of the potentially greater
risk of malignancy, and small hypoattenuating nodules should be more often
followed up in shorter intervals than large nodules.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chung, J.-J., Yu, J. S., Kim, J. H., Kim, M.-J., Kim, K. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3409</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Nonhypervascular Hypoattenuating Nodules Depicted on Either Portal or Equilibrium Phase Multiphasic CT Images in the Cirrhotic Liver]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>214</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/215?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Growth Rate of New Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluation with Multiphase CT]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/215?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate with serial
follow-up CT examinations the growth rate of new hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) developing after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and to determine
an appropriate follow-up interval for imaging.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Sixty-two new HCCs appearing after
percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in 59 patients who underwent follow-up
multiphase CT were retrospectively identified. The volume of the new HCCs at
follow-up CT was measured on a PACS monitor with an area measuring tool and
summation-of-areas technique. We calculated tumor volume doubling time and
tumor diameter doubling time. The growth rate was represented by tumor volume
doubling time. We also used stepwise multiple linear regression analysis to
evaluate the relation between clinical variables and tumor volume doubling
time.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Mean baseline and follow-up tumor volumes were 580
mm<sup>3</sup> (range, 85&ndash;13,861 mm<sup>3</sup>) and 2,072
mm<sup>3</sup> (range, 535&ndash;35,937 mm<sup>3</sup>). Mean baseline and
follow-up tumor diameters were 9.9 mm (range, 5.5&ndash;29.8 mm) and 15.0 mm
(range, 10.1&ndash;40.9 mm). Mean tumor volume and tumor diameter doubling
times were 75 days (range, 21&ndash;209 days) and 219 days (range,
57&ndash;897 days). Volume doubling times of baseline tumors with a diameter
of 1 cm or less were significantly shorter than those of the larger baseline
tumors (mean, 55 vs 88 days; <I>p</I> = 0.024).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The growth rate of new HCCs after percutaneous
radiofrequency ablation was higher than that reported in natural outcome
studies of untreated HCCs. The results of our study suggest that a shorter
follow-up interval for imaging, 2.5 months (75 days), is appropriate.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, Y., Choi, D., Lim, H. K., Rhim, H., Kim, Y.-s., Kim, S. H., Lee, W. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3297</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Growth Rate of New Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluation with Multiphase CT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>220</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>215</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/221?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MR Cholangiopancreatography Features of the Biliary Tree After Liver Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/221?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Our objective was to show the usefulness of MR
cholangiopancreatography in assessing biliary complications after liver
transplantation.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> MR cholangiopancreatography is the best noninvasive tool
for the diagnosis and assessment of biliary complications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Novellas, S., Caramella, T., Fournol, M., Gugenheim, J., Chevallier, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2938</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MR Cholangiopancreatography Features of the Biliary Tree After Liver Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>221</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic MRI and MRCP Findings in Patients with HIV Infection]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this article is to describe the spectrum
of MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) findings of hepatic, pancreatic,
and biliary manifestations in patients with HIV infection.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The spectrum of MRI and MRCP findings in HIV-infected
patients includes acute or chronic hepatitis (or both), pancreatitis,
cholangitis, acalculous cholecystitis, and biliary strictures that may
resemble primary sclerosing cholangitis. The presence of segmental
extrahepatic biliary strictures is characteristic of AIDS cholangiopathy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bilgin, M., Balci, N. C., Erdogan, A., Momtahen, A. J., Alkaade, S., Rau, W. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic MRI and MRCP Findings in Patients with HIV Infection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/W8?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Changes of Portosystemic Collaterals and Splenic Volume on CT After Liver Transplantation and Factors Influencing Those Changes]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/1/W8?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to investigate the changes
of portosystemic collaterals and splenic volume after liver transplantation
and to determine the factors influencing those changes.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Ninety-nine patients underwent liver CT
before; immediately after (&lt; 2 weeks); and 2, 6, and 12 months after liver
transplantation. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the CT images to
determine the grade of the portosystemic collaterals and the volume of the
spleen. Portosystemic collaterals were categorized as esophageal,
paraesophageal, gastric submucosal, gastric adventitial, splenic, mesenteric,
or retroperitoneal varices. First, the largest diameter of each varix was
determined. Each varix was graded using a 5-point scale according to the
number of dilated vessels and the largest diameter. Splenic volume was
calculated using a previously reported formula. To determine how varices and
splenomegaly develop over time, the grade of varices on each postoperative CT
scan was compared with those on the preoperative and immediately prior CT
scans. The degree of change of the portosystemic collaterals and change in the
splenic volume on CT were correlated with the type of transplantation
(deceased-donor-related liver transplantation [DDLT] vs living-donor-related
liver transplantation [LDLT]), the transplanted liver weight, and the presence
of postoperative adverse events such as rejection and portal or hepatic vein
stenosis.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> All varices except splenic and retroperitoneal varices and
splenic volume were significantly decreased on CT performed within 2 weeks
after liver transplantation (<I>p</I> &lt; 0.05). Approximately 2 months
after liver transplantation, all varices except the esophageal varices and
splenic volume became stable. The type of transplantation and the presence of
postoperative adverse events did not affect the degree of change of varices or
change in splenic volume. However, the rate of volume reduction of the spleen
in LDLT was weakly but significantly correlated with the weight of the
transplanted liver (Pearson's correlation coefficient, <I>r</I> = 0.401;
<I>p</I> &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Most varices and splenomegaly significantly decrease
during the early postoperative period (&lt; 2 months) after liver
transplantation. Patients with large liver transplants undergo a greater
decrease in spleen volume than patients with small liver transplants.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, S. H., Lee, J. M., Choi, J. Y., Suh, K.-S., Yi, N.-J., Han, J. K., Choi, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2990</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Changes of Portosystemic Collaterals and Splenic Volume on CT After Liver Transplantation and Factors Influencing Those Changes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>191</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W16</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1527?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MR Cholangiopancreatography with T2-Weighted Prospective Acquisition Correction Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence of the Biliary Anatomy of Potential Living Liver Transplant Donors]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1527?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The objective of our study was to evaluate the ability of
a respiratory navigator-triggered T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence
with a prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique for MR
cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to depict the biliary anatomy of living donor
liver transplantation (LDLT) donors.</p>
<p><b>SUBJECTS AND METHODS.</b> Forty potential LDLT donors who ranged in age
from 19 to 54 years were prospectively evaluated with preoperative MRCP. MRCP
was performed with a 1.5-T magnetic field using T2-weighted PACE TSE sequence.
MRCP source data sets were processed with maximum-intensity-projection (MIP)
and shaded surface display (SSD) algorithms. Findings were compared with
intraoperative cholangiography. Biliary anatomy was classified according to
the classification proposed by Huang and colleagues. The sensitivity,
specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value
(NPV) of MRCP for the detection of aberrant biliary anatomy were
calculated.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Intraoperative cholangiography and biliary exploration
revealed that 27 donor candidates (67.5%) had conventional and 13 (32.5%) had
aberrant biliary anatomy. Two donors (5%) had type B biliary anatomy; eight
donors (20%), type C; two donors (5%), type D; and one donor (2.5%),
unclassified. The sensitivity of MRCP source data sets in differentiating
aberrant biliary anatomies from nonaberrant ones was 100%, the specificity was
88.9%, and the accuracy was 92.5%. PPV and NPV were 81.3% and 100%,
respectively. The sensitivity of MIP images in differentiating aberrant
biliary anatomies was 100%, the specificity was 88.9%, and the accuracy was
92.5%. PPV and NPV were 81.3% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity,
specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of the SSD images in detecting aberrant
biliary anatomies were 100%, 77.8%, 85%, 68.4%, and 100%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Preoperative MRCP using a respiratory
navigator-triggered T2-weighted TSE sequence with a PACE technique accurately
depicts the biliary anatomy in LDLT donors and may guide intraoperative
management of the biliary tract.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Basaran, C., Agildere, A. M., Donmez, F. Y., Sevmis, S., Budakoglu, I., Karakayali, H., Haberal, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MR Cholangiopancreatography with T2-Weighted Prospective Acquisition Correction Turbo Spin-Echo Sequence of the Biliary Anatomy of Potential Living Liver Transplant Donors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1533</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1527</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1534?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MR Elastography of Liver Tumors: Preliminary Results]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/1534?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential
value of MR elastography (MRE) in the characterization of solid liver
tumors.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Forty-four liver tumors (14 metastatic
lesions, 12 hepatocellular carcinomas, nine hemangiomas, five
cholangiocarcinomas, three cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, and one hepatic
adenoma) were evaluated with MRE. MRE was performed with a 1.5-T system with a
modified phase-contrast gradient-echo sequence to collect axial wave images
sensitized along the through-plane motion direction. The tumors were
identified on T2- and T1-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images,
and the MRE images were obtained through the tumor. A stiffness map
(elastogram) was generated in an automated process consisting of an inversion
algorithm. The mean shear stiffness of the tumor was calculated with a
manually specified region of interest over the tumor in the stiffness map. The
stiffness value of tumor-free hepatic parenchyma was calculated. Statistical
analysis was performed on the stiffness values for differentiation of normal
liver, fibrotic liver, benign tumors, and malignant tumors.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Malignant liver tumors had significantly greater mean shear
stiffness than benign tumors (10.1 kPa vs 2.7 kPa, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.001),
fibrotic liver (10.1 kPa vs 5.9 kPa, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.001), and normal liver
(10.1 kPa vs 2.3 kPa, <I>p</I> &lt; 0.001). Fibrotic livers had stiffness
values overlapping both the benign and the malignant tumors. A cutoff value of
5 kPa accurately differentiated malignant tumors from benign tumors and normal
liver parenchyma in this preliminary investigation.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> MR elastography is a promising noninvasive technique for
assessing solid liver tumors. Use of MRE may lead to new quantitative tissue
characterization parameters for differentiating benign and malignant liver
tumors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venkatesh, S. K., Yin, M., Glockner, J. F., Takahashi, N., Araoz, P. A., Talwalkar, J. A., Ehman, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3123</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] MR Elastography of Liver Tumors: Preliminary Results]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1540</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1534</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W323?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Comparison Between One-Route and Two-Route Injection for Liver and Aortic Enhancement Using MDCT]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W323?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether
simultaneous injection into cubital veins bilaterally at one half of the
standard injection rate achieves similar hepatic and aortic enhancement on
MDCT as the conventional injection rate into a single cubital vein.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Thirty-two patients underwent multiphase MDCT
because they were suspected of having a hepatic tumor. Patients were assigned
to one of the following two groups: group A, 100 mL of 370 mg I/mL of contrast
medium injected into a unilateral cubital vein (one-route) via a 20-gauge
cannula at a rate of 4 mL/s; or group B, 50 mL of contrast medium injected
into the cubital veins bilaterally (two-route) via 24-gauge cannulas at 2
mL/s. Peak contrast enhancement of the liver and abdominal aorta for groups A
and B was measured using regions of interest and compared; arrival time of the
contrast media was also compared using a bolus-tracking system. Analysis was
performed using Wilcoxon's signed rank test.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Peak aortic enhancement of groups A and B was 367 &plusmn;
67 H and 361 &plusmn; 113 H (<I>p</I> = 0.61, not significant),
respectively, and peak hepatic enhancement of groups A and B was 56 &plusmn;
11 H and 56 &plusmn; 16 H (<I>p</I> = 0.88, not significant), respectively.
Mean arrival time to the aorta of group B (19.4 &plusmn; 3.4 seconds) was
significantly later compared with that of group A (15.5 &plusmn; 3.5 seconds)
(<I>p</I> = 0.005).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> The slower two-route injection produced the same aortic
and hepatic enhancement as the faster one-route method with faster injection,
but the arrival time of the contrast medium was later using the two-route
method.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Okada, M., Murakami, T., Kumano, S., Imaoka, I., Shimono, T., Ashikaga, R., Hosono, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Comparison Between One-Route and Two-Route Injection for Liver and Aortic Enhancement Using MDCT]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W326</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W323</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] 2D Thick-Slab MR Cholangiopancreatography: Does Parallel Imaging with Sensitivity Encoding Improve Image Quality and Duct Visualization?]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Our objective was to determine whether the theoretic
advantages of parallel imaging are realized when applied to 2D thick-slab
single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with
respect to image quality and duct conspicuity.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> Thirty-nine patients (18 men and 21 women;
mean age, 51.8 years) were referred for MRCP. Multiangled thick-slab
breath-hold SSFSE imaging was performed without and with integrated parallel
imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Images were retrospectively
reviewed. A 4-point rating scale was used to grade overall image quality and
visibility of 10 ductal segments. A Wilcoxon's signed rank test compared the
two techniques. Analysis of signal intensities and relative contrast of
fluid-filled structures to background tissue on the basis of region of
interest was calculated. Differences between the techniques were compared
using a Student's <I>t</I> test.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> Two-dimensional thick-slab SSFSE with integrated parallel
imaging showed a mild but statistically significant increase in the relative
contrast (<I>p</I> = 0.01) of ductal segments. Image quality deteriorated
slightly with parallel imaging, but the results were not statistically
significant (<I>p</I> = 0.06). Parallel imaging improved duct conspicuity of
the medial and lateral segments of the left lobe and the posterior segment of
the right lobe. However, statistical improvement was achieved only for the
medial segment of the left lobe (<I>p</I> = 0.03). The mean scores of the
remaining ducts were either unchanged or worse with parallel imaging, but the
differences were not significant.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Although there was improvement in the relative contrast
of bile to background tissue, improvement in overall image quality was not
observed with parallel imaging. However, application of parallel imaging to
thick-slab SSFSE may improve depiction of the smallest-caliber ducts.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hosseinzadeh, K., Furlan, A., Almusa, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.2854</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] 2D Thick-Slab MR Cholangiopancreatography: Does Parallel Imaging with Sensitivity Encoding Improve Image Quality and Duct Visualization?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W334</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W335?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Virtual CT Sonography with Magnetic Navigation]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/190/6/W335?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>OBJECTIVE.</b> Virtual CT sonography with magnetic navigation yields
cross-sectional images of CT volume data that correspond to the angle of the
transducer in the magnetic field in real time. The purpose of this study was
to evaluate the efficiency and feasibility of virtual CT sonography for
radiofrequency ablation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma poorly
defined on B-mode sonography.</p>
<p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS.</b> One hundred one patients enrolled in the
study were separated into two groups. Fifty-one patients with 65
hepatocellular carcinomas underwent prospective virtual CT sonography as
guidance for radiofrequency ablation. Fifty patients with 63 hepatocellular
carcinomas managed with B-mode sonographic guidance were retrospectively
selected under the same conditions as the virtual CT sonography group to act
as a historical control group.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS.</b> In the virtual CT sonography group, technically successful
ablation was achieved in a single session in 92% (47/51) of the patients and
in two sessions in 8% (4/51). In the B-mode sonography group, technical
success was achieved in a single session in 72% (36/50) of the patients, in
two sessions in 24% (12/50), and in three sessions in 4% (2/50). Treatment
analysis showed that the technical success rate after a single treatment
session was significantly (<I>p</I> = 0.017) higher for the virtual CT
sonography group. The number of treatment sessions was significantly
(<I>p</I> = 0.021) lower for the virtual CT sonography group (mean, 1.1
&plusmn; 0.1 vs 1.3 &plusmn; 0.3 sessions).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION.</b> Virtual CT sonographically assisted radiofrequency
ablation is an efficient treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
that is poorly defined on B-mode sonography.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minami, Y., Chung, H., Kudo, M., Kitai, S., Takahashi, S., Inoue, T., Ueshima, K., Shiozaki, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.2214/AJR.07.3092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hepatobiliary Imaging] Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Virtual CT Sonography with Magnetic Navigation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Roentgen Ray Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>190</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>W341</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>W335</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hepatobiliary Imaging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>